OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONProject SC Butler: Day 183: Sentence Correction (SC1)
•
equal and
equivalent do not mean the same thing.
• track very carefully on what is being compared in each option
• think about the logical meaning of the words
• very generally, use
equal to talk about quantitative things, but use
equivalent to talk about qualitative things
The word
equivalent typically means that two things are similar in function or quality.
Quality can include size or capacity.
This rule is not set in stone. It's a guideline.
We use
equal to talk about numeric relationships.
• a number, numerical quantity, or quantifiable measurement is
equal (not "equivalent") to another number, numerical quantity, or measurement
-- one quadrillion equals 1,000 trillion
• this sentence is
not trying to compare the number of gallons of water used up from a reservoir to the number of gallons of water contained in Lake Huron.
-- no option offers a quantity word such as "the number of" or "as many as are" in Lake Huron.
-- there is no quantity to compare
a quadrillion gallons to. Don't use
equal. Use equivalent.
• both the absence of a phrase such as "number of" [gallons of water in Lake Huron] and the word "equivalent" indicate that
1) we are talking about enormous volume (capacity)
2) we are being given a real-world example in order to imagine that enormous capacity.
That is, the sentence means that a quadrillion gallons of water is the equivalent of the capacity of Lake Huron.
The farmers and ranchers essentially drained the equivalent of Lake Huron.
Here is a similar sentence from the
New York Times in which area in square feet is "the equivalent of":
. . . a local copper mill, . . . a facility encompassing more than one million square feet — roughly the equivalent of 17 football fields. (
July, 2018, here A quadrillion is unthinkably huge. Lake Huron is conceivably huge—not perfectly conceivable, but a lot better than "a quadrillion gallons."
THE PROMPTQuote:
Since the 1940's the farms and ranches of the Great Plains have been supplied with water from the Ogallala aquifer; this underground reservoir contained an estimated quadrillion gallons of water, which equal Lake Huron, but now reserves are becoming depleted.
THE OPTIONSQuote:
A) Since the 1940's the farms and ranches of the Great Plains have been supplied with water from the Ogallala aquifer; this underground reservoir contained an estimated quadrillion gallons of water, which equal Lake Huron, but now reserves are becoming depleted.
•
gallons of water equal a
lake. Gallons of water are identical to a lake?
No.
A quadrillion gallons is a number. Lake Huron is a body of water.
Wrong. • the situation is just as faulty if we say that "1 quadrillion gallons
of water," which equal Lake Huron.
Wrong. A quadrillion is a number.
• We might be able to correct this option
if we said
. . . an estimated quadrillion gallons of water, which are about equal to the number that are in Lake Huron
(We can imply "gallons of water.")
That not-available sentence is clunky, but it is logical.
Eliminate A
Quote:
B) Since the 1940's the farms and ranches of the Great Plains have been supplied with water from the Ogallala aquifer; this underground reservoir contained an estimated quadrillion gallons of water, which equal Lake Huron's [gallons of water], but now reserves are becoming depleted.
•
incorrect identity. -- "which" means "gallons of water." (More on this issue below.)
-- The verb following
which is
equal, plural. The word "gallons" is plural. "Water" is not.
•
One quadrillion gallons of water from a reservoir is a number that is not identical to, or the same as, Lake Huron's [gallons of water].
• a reference to a quantity is missing
-- The bracketed words [gallons of water] are permissible ellipsis (omission of words).
-- But we need a reference to quantity of gallons of water in Lake Huron. None exists.
Eliminate B
(alternatively, if you feel uncertain, KEEP B and compare to another answer)
Quote:
C) Since the 1940's the farms and ranches of the Great Plains have been supplied with water from the Ogallala aquifer; this underground reservoir contained an estimated quadrillion gallons of water, equal to Lake Huron's, but now reserves are becoming depleted.
• This option is the same as Option (B), but the words "which are" have been removed
• The sentence still says that a quadrillion gallons of water from an underground reservoir are identical to Lake Huron's [gallons of water].
The quadrillion gallons of water in the aquifer that the farmers and ranchers used up is not identical to [the gallons of] water in Lake Huron.
• we still need a reference of some kind to a quantity: . . . an estimated quadrillion gallons, a number equal to the number in Lake Huron . . .
Eliminate C
Quote:
D) Since the 1940's the farms and ranches of the Great Plains have been supplied with water from the Ogallala aquifer; this underground reservoir contained an estimated quadrillion gallons of water, the equivalent of Lake Huron's [gallons of water], but now reserves are becoming depleted.
• Now we have a doubly bad situation.
•
equivalent to Lake
Huron's [gallons of water]?
No. Gallons of water are measurable. A measurable quantity takes equal.
The possessive word "Huron's" implies "gallons of water," and ruins this answer. We should say that one quantity is equal to or the same as another
quantity -- "equivalent" in this context is used to indicate similar qualities.
-- A quadrillion gallons of water from the reservoir and Lake Huron's gallons of water are not equivalent in quality.
Eliminate (D)
Quote:
E) Since the 1940's the farms and ranches of the Great Plains have been supplied with water from the Ogallala aquifer; this underground reservoir contained an estimated quadrillion gallons of water, the equivalent of Lake Huron, but now reserves are becoming depleted.
• bingo. The capacity of the almost-empty reservoir is about a quadrillion gallons of water, [a capacity that is] the equivalent of [the capacity of ] Lake Huron
• the point of the sentence comes through. Farmers and ranchers have drained the equivalent of Lake Huron.
Suppose that you held back B or C.
Neither B nor C contains a comparison between a number (a quadrillion) and another number (of gallons of water in Lake Huron).
Neither B nor C says ". . . a quadrillion gallons of water, about as many as are contained in Lake Huron. . . ."
In this split, stay with the guideline.
-- Compare a number or quantity to another number or quantity, and use "equal."
-- Compare degrees of similarity -- similar uncountable capacities or volumes -- by using
equivalent.
Options B and C make incorrect identities.
The answer is EQuick recap of WHICH. The word "which" does NOT have to refer to the immediately preceding noun. Which can "reach back" over a prepositional phrase to reach the MAIN NOUN in a prepositional phrase.
This usage is very common on the GMAT.
--
which is a nonessential modifier. British English speakers, you will have to be a little careful because B.E. does not treat "which" as nonessential.
Remember: comma + which = nonessential
-- the prepositional phrase "of water" is essential (gallons of what? Oil? Vodka? NO. Gallons of water)
-- we have two modifiers that refer to the same noun. Only one can go right next to the noun.
-- so the essential modifier trumps the nonessential modifier, but both can still refer to their noun.
-- the nonessential modifier WHICH can still refer to its noun: it is allowed to reach back over an essential modifier to get to its noun.
This topic thread, here, contains a lot of useful information, as well as a post by me about the use of which, which can be found
here..
That post discusses how "which" is an exception to the noun modifier "Touch Rule" and list a couple of official questions as examples.
I also discuss how to figure out the noun that is being modified by the which-clause. (Check the verb that follows
which.)
COMMENTScyclops12321 and
sathik63 , welcome to SC Butler.
This question requires you to think really hard about logic or to have read every day.
Google the names of prominent U.S. newspapers and (in quotation marks) "the equivalent of."
You will get pages' of hits.
This question riffs on an official question that made aspirants a little frustrated.
That question emphasized numbers. This one emphasizes capacity.
The official question is
here.
A quadrillion gallons of water is an enormous volume of water: one thousand trillion gallons.
The question emphasizes this enormous volume (of water used up by farmers and ranchers) and the enormous capacity of the Ogallala aquifer by invoking a famous lake—also of enormous volume.
Anyone who posted was brave. Smiley faces to all, and kudos for the correct answer.