GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 18 Oct 2019, 02:59

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The recent construction of the chemical plant on the shores

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Retired Moderator
avatar
V
Joined: 22 Jun 2014
Posts: 1093
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 540 Q45 V20
GPA: 2.49
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User
The recent construction of the chemical plant on the shores  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Mar 2017, 08:35
4
7
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

87% (01:21) correct 13% (01:56) wrong based on 588 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The recent construction of the chemical plant on the shores of Lake Blue has introduced a new pollutant into the water: toxidil. Toxidil first works its way into the ecosystem through the underwater plant life. These plants absorb the pollutant, which is then transmitted to the local fish population when the vegetation is ingested. Fish so tainted appear healthy, but their meat, when consumed by humans, leads to serious health problems. The population living in the vicinity of Lake Blue will undoubtedly suffer a decline in health due to the new chemical plant.

Which of the following is an assumption necessary for the author's conclusion?

(A) Other pollutants are not also detrimental to human health.

(B) The fish in Lake Blue are consumed by the people who reside nearby.

(C) The first reported incidences of fish tainted with toxidil occurred in Lake Blue, and not elsewhere within Canada or the United States.

(D) Currently, the only source of toxidil in the world is the chemical plant at Lake Blue.

(E) Banning chemical processes that produce toxidil will merely cause the owners of the chemical plant to continue these same processes in secret at Lake Blue.

_________________
Board of Directors
User avatar
D
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 4773
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE: Business Development (Commercial Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The recent construction of the chemical plant on the shores  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Mar 2017, 09:11
HKD1710 wrote:
The recent construction of the chemical plant on the shores of Lake Blue has introduced a new pollutant into the water: toxidil. Toxidil first works its way into the ecosystem through the underwater plant life. These plants absorb the pollutant, which is then transmitted to the local fish population when the vegetation is ingested. Fish so tainted appear healthy, but their meat, when consumed by humans, leads to serious health problems. The population living in the vicinity of Lake Blue will undoubtedly suffer a decline in health due to the new chemical plant.

Which of the following is an assumption necessary for the author's conclusion?

(A) Other pollutants are not also detrimental to human health.

(B) The fish in Lake Blue are consumed by the people who reside nearby.

(C) The first reported incidences of fish tainted with toxidil occurred in Lake Blue, and not elsewhere within Canada or the United States.

(D) Currently, the only source of toxidil in the world is the chemical plant at Lake Blue.

(E) Banning chemical processes that produce toxidil will merely cause the owners of the chemical plant to continue these same processes in secret at Lake Blue.


Answer will clearly be (B) from the highlighted part quoted above, negating the above will result in braking the conclusion
_________________
Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 29
Location: United Kingdom
WE: Corporate Finance (Energy and Utilities)
Re: The recent construction of the chemical plant on the shores  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Mar 2017, 09:15
B clearly destroys the link when negated.

Author is assuming that settlement living near Lake blue will consume the tainted fish .
Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 04 Apr 2015
Posts: 104
Re: The recent construction of the chemical plant on the shores  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Mar 2017, 22:07
Why not D

If there are other sources of pollutants then health decline will not be because of new plant.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 09 Feb 2015
Posts: 329
Location: India
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 2.8
Reviews Badge
Re: The recent construction of the chemical plant on the shores  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Mar 2017, 02:13
varundixitmro2512 wrote:
Why not D

If there are other sources of pollutants then health decline will not be because of new plant.


The recent construction of the chemical plant on the shores of Lake Blue has introduced a new pollutant into the water: toxidil. Toxidil first works its way into the ecosystem through the underwater plant life. These plants absorb the pollutant, which is then transmitted to the local fish population when the vegetation is ingested. Fish so tainted appear healthy, but their meat, when consumed by humans, leads to serious health problems. The population living in the vicinity of Lake Blue will undoubtedly suffer a decline in health due to the new chemical plant.

Which of the following is an assumption necessary for the author's conclusion?

(A) Other pollutants are not also detrimental to human health.

(B) The fish in Lake Blue are consumed by the people who reside nearby.

(C) The first reported incidences of fish tainted with toxidil occurred in Lake Blue, and not elsewhere within Canada or the United States.

(D) Currently, the only source of toxidil in the world is the chemical plant at Lake Blue.

(E) Banning chemical processes that produce toxidil will merely cause the owners of the chemical plant to continue these same processes in secret at Lake Blue.

The question stem is asking for an assumption.

Conclusion is :
The population living in the vicinity of Lake Blue will undoubtedly suffer a decline in health due to the new chemical plant.

This is based on the assumption that people living nearby eat the fish from that lake.
If people don't eat fish from the lake they wont get the toxin into their bodies. Negating this will shatter the conclusion.

As to why d is wrong, Pay attention to the argument structure.
We dont care of there are any other sources. If there are other sources how does that affect the conclusion.
It doesn't shatter it if there are other sources of the Toxin.

Hard and fast rule to find the correct assumption.
Negate it. if negating the assumption shatters the conclusion then its the right one.

Hope i made it clear.
IIMA, IIMC School Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 1366
Location: India
WE: Engineering (Other)
CAT Tests
The recent construction of the chemical plant on the shores  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Apr 2018, 05:09
GMATNinja VeritasPrepKarishma

Please help with my PoE:

Conclusion: The population living in the vicinity of Lake Blue will undoubtedly suffer a decline in health due to the new chemical plant.

How does author arrive here?
A recent construction of a chemical plant introduces a pollutant T in water.
T transfers to fish wide vegetation they consume. When humans consume sick fish, they
too become sick.

So people living nearby the Lake Blue will be sick due to new chemical plant.

Quote:
(B) The fish in Lake Blue are consumed by the people who reside nearby.

Negating this -> The fish in Lake Blue are NOT consumed by the people who reside nearby. Shatters the conclusion

Quote:
(D) Currently, the only source of toxidil in the world is the chemical plant at Lake Blue.

Negate this ->Currently, there are other sources toxidil in the world than the chemical plant at Lake Blue.
Then also this WEAKENS my conclusion.Since now I can not attribute sickness of people to new chemical plant.
_________________
It's the journey that brings us happiness not the destination.

Feeling stressed, you are not alone!!
Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 20 Apr 2018
Posts: 42
The recent construction of the chemical plant on the shores of Lake Bl  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 06 May 2018, 12:44
The recent construction of the chemical plant on the shores of Lake Blue has introduced a new pollutant into the water: toxidil. Toxidil first works its way into the ecosystem through the underwater plant life. These plants absorb the pollutant, which is then transmitted to the local fish population when the vegetation is ingested. Fish so tainted appear healthy, but their meat, when consumed by humans, leads to serious health problems. The population living in the vicinity of Lake Blue will undoubtedly suffer a decline in health due to the new chemical plant.

Which of the following is an assumption necessary for the author's conclusion?

(A) Other pollutants are not also detrimental to human health.

(B) The fish in Lake Blue are consumed by the people who reside nearby.

(C) The first reported incidences of fish tainted with toxidil occurred in Lake Blue, and not elsewhere within Canada or the United States.

(D) Currently, the only source of toxidil in the world is the chemical plant at Lake Blue.

(E) Banning chemical processes that produce toxidil will merely cause the owners of the chemical plant to continue these same processes in secret at Lake Blue.
_________________
Please press +1 Kudos if you find my post/reply helpful

Originally posted by Gmat800Champ on 03 May 2018, 21:13.
Last edited by pushpitkc on 06 May 2018, 12:44, edited 1 time in total.
Edited question, added OA!
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Status: EAT SLEEP GMAT REPEAT!
Joined: 28 Sep 2016
Posts: 142
Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: The recent construction of the chemical plant on the shores of Lake Bl  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 May 2018, 21:47
2
Hi Gmat800Champ,

IMO the Answer is B. As Negating B shatters the conclusion.Remaining all options are irrelevant or Out of scope.
And please post in the correct category by mentioning the relevant source.

Thanks

+1 if this helps!

Gmat800Champ wrote:
The recent construction of the chemical plant on the shores of Lake Blue has introduced a new pollutant into the water: toxidil. Toxidil first works its way into the ecosystem through the underwater plant life. These plants absorb the pollutant, which is then transmitted to the local fish population when the vegetation is ingested. Fish so tainted appear healthy, but their meat, when consumed by humans, leads to serious health problems. The population living in the vicinity of Lake Blue will undoubtedly suffer a decline in health due to the new chemical plant.

Which of the following is an assumption necessary for the author's conclusion?

(A) Other pollutants are not also detrimental to human health.

(B) The fish in Lake Blue are consumed by the people who reside nearby.

(C) The first reported incidences of fish tainted with toxidil occurred in Lake Blue, and not elsewhere within Canada or the United States.

(D) Currently, the only source of toxidil in the world is the chemical plant at Lake Blue.

(E) Banning chemical processes that produce toxidil will merely cause the owners of the chemical plant to continue these same processes in secret at Lake Blue.


PPhoenix77 and Adi93

_________________
Regards,
Adi
CR & LSAT Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Studying for the LSAT -- Corruptus in Extremis
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 776
Location: United States (MA)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Reviews Badge
Re: The recent construction of the chemical plant on the shores  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jun 2018, 12:03
1
Gmat800Champ,

Merged topics. Please look before posting!

Mod Nightblade
_________________
D-Day: November 18th, 2017

My CR Guide: Here

My RC Guide: Here

Need an expert to grade your AWA? Go: Here

Want to be a moderator? We may want you to be one! See how: Here
Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 20 Apr 2018
Posts: 42
Re: The recent construction of the chemical plant on the shores  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jun 2018, 20:43
Yes, got your point, Haven't posted for a while.

nightblade354 wrote:
Gmat800Champ,

Merged topics. Please look before posting!

Mod Nightblade

_________________
Please press +1 Kudos if you find my post/reply helpful
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 24 Feb 2018
Posts: 31
GRE 1: Q168 V156
Re: The recent construction of the chemical plant on the shores  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jun 2018, 03:25
The general rule for such questions should be:
1. Eliminate all out of scope options.
2. Negate the available options and check if the conclusion still holds.
Director
Director
User avatar
D
Joined: 08 Jun 2013
Posts: 543
Location: France
Schools: INSEAD Jan '19
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
GPA: 3.82
WE: Consulting (Other)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The recent construction of the chemical plant on the shores  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Oct 2018, 01:27
We know that we are hunting for an assumption from the question stem. The issue?: the unfortunate case of water pollution in Lake Blue. The evidence we are given describes the process by which the fish are tainted, and lets us know the detrimental effects of eating these fish. The author concludes that the chemical plant will lead to health problems among the general populace of the Lake Blue area. For the conclusion to make sense, there must be a connection between it and the evidence. We know that eating tainted fish is unhealthy, so for the people to become unhealthy, they must actually eat these fish. Now that we have a good pre-phrase, its time to scan for a match, and answer choice (B) nicely sums up what we predicted the assumption must be.

(A) introduces some out-of-scope "other pollutants", which may or may not be present in Lake Blue. Even if they were, toxidil could still further reduce the health of the people. (C) and (D) introduce irrelevant information. Meanwhile, what should or could be done about the pollution is outside the scope of the passage: the author only discusses the effects of pollution, not solutions for it, so (E) is incorrect.
_________________
Everything will fall into place…

There is perfect timing for
everything and everyone.
Never doubt, But Work on
improving yourself,
Keep the faith and
Stay ready. When it’s
finally your turn,
It will all make sense.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The recent construction of the chemical plant on the shores   [#permalink] 13 Oct 2018, 01:27
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The recent construction of the chemical plant on the shores

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne