Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: The sum of the positive integers from 1 to 27 is equivalent [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Aug 2013, 05:55

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

Stiv wrote:

The sum of the positive integers from 1 to 27 is equivalent to the sum of the integers from A -27 to 54 B 0 to 28 C 15 to 45 D 38 to 46 E 48 to 54

I give kudos to anybody who post quick and efficient way for solving the problem (< 1 min.)

Summation : 27/2 . {2 . 1 + 26 . 1} = 27 . 14

we can eliminate A because there were 27 numbers on the question and the last was 27. After this 27 numbers every number is far more than these 27 numbers. So addition of same number of numbers after 27 must not be equal . B eliminated by sight. C contains 31 numbers , each is bigger than 1 to 27 serially. so eliminated.

only last two worth calculation.

Now D, So 9/2 {2 . 38 + (9-1) . 1} = 9 . 42 = 9 . 3 . 14 = 27 . 14 . it equals the summation of 1 to 27 Answer (D)
_________________

Re: The sum of the positive integers from 1 to 27 is equivalent [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Aug 2013, 14:39

2

This post received KUDOS

Stiv wrote:

The sum of the positive integers from 1 to 27 is equivalent to the sum of the integers from A -27 to 54 B 0 to 28 C 15 to 45 D 38 to 46 E 48 to 54

I give kudos to anybody who post quick and efficient way for solving the problem (< 1 min.)

Sum of the integers from 1 to 27 is the average of first and last terms multiplied by # of terms. Applying that to the question stem gives you (28/2) * (27) -(14) * (27) -(3 * 3 * 3 * 2 * 7).

Choice A is basically the sum of 27 - 54 which will be too big Choice B is tempting but after applying the formula you will get (14) * (28) Choice C will be too big as well, there are 30 terms and each term is bigger than it's corresponding term in the original sequence

Choice D looks like it could work, so apply the formula.

Re: The sum of the positive integers from 1 to 27 is equivalent [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Aug 2014, 23:57

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Re: The sum of the positive integers from 1 to 27 is equivalent [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Aug 2015, 20:42

sum of consecutive positve integers =n(n+1)/2 =27*28/2 =27*14 =378. so now we see options in option A -27 to 54. if we substitute -27 to 27 sum equal to 0. thereafter 28to54 is greater than 378. so option B is 0t0 28. sum equal 1to 28 it is greater than 1to 27.

option C sum 15 to 45, total number is 31. medain number is 30. sum of consecutive no equal to median *total no of terms. =30*31=910.

option D 38 to 46 total 9 numbers are there. median no 42*9=378. option E 48 to 54 total numbers 7 . median no 51*7=357. It is less than sum. so option D is correct.

I'm going to give you a hint so that you can try this question again....

This question can be solved by 'bunching' (and a bit of pattern matching). To start, we have to figure out the sum of the integers from 1 to 27, inclusive. You are correct that you can start by 'bunching' the terms...

1+27 = 28 2+26 = 28 3+25 = 28 Etc.

Since there are 27 terms, there will be 13 'pairs' and a 'middle' term that does not get paired; the final sum will be 13(28) + 14. At this point, you can do the arithmetic in a couple of different ways.

Re: The sum of the positive integers from 1 to 27 is equivalent [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Sep 2015, 15:01

EMPOWERgmatRichC wrote:

Hi gmatser1,

I'm going to give you a hint so that you can try this question again....

This question can be solved by 'bunching' (and a bit of pattern matching). To start, we have to figure out the sum of the integers from 1 to 27, inclusive. You are correct that you can start by 'bunching' the terms...

1+27 = 28 2+26 = 28 3+25 = 28 Etc.

Since there are 27 terms, there will be 13 'pairs' and a 'middle' term that does not get paired; the final sum will be 13(28) + 14. At this point, you can do the arithmetic in a couple of different ways.

You mentioned in your last post how "mapping out" all of the pairs would have taken too long. I agree, but you don't really have to map them all out to see the pattern and the total. Here's how:

You know that the first few 'pairs' are....

1+27 = 28 2+26 = 28

So the 'smaller number' + the 'bigger number' will total 28. Using that logic:

1) What would be the 'bigger number' when the 'smaller number' was 13? 2) Using all of the 'smaller numbers' for reference, how many total 'pairs' would there be? 3) Once you know what 'pairs up' with 13, how hard is it to find any 'leftover' numbers?

As you continue to study, you're going to find that most GMAT questions can be answered in a variety of ways. If you find that "your way" of approaching the prompt takes too long, then it might be that you're approaching the prompt in "the long way."

The sum of the positive integers from 1 to 27 is equivalent to the sum of the integers from

A. -27 to 54 B. 0 to 28 C. 15 to 45 D. 38 to 46 E. 48 to 54

Sum of Numbers = Average * Number of numbers If numbers are from 1 to 27, average will be the middle number 14. Sum of numbers = 14 * 27

We need to find the option where the sum is the same.

A. -27 to 54 -27 to -1 will cancel out numbers from 1 to 27. So the sum would be the sum of numbers from 28 to 54. These will be 27 numbers but with a much higher average. So ignore this option.

B. 0 to 28 Here the sum will be 28 more than our desired sum. Ignore this option.

C. 15 to 45 Here we have 31 numbers with an average much more than 14. So the sum will be much more than the desired sum. Ignore.

D. 38 to 46 Here we have 9 numbers with an average of 42 (the middle number). Sum = 42 * 9 = 14 * 27 (matches) This is the answer.

E. 48 to 54 Just to complete the calculations, let me show you how you can compare this option too. Here we have 7 numbers with an average of 51. Sum = 7 * 51 = 14 * 51/2 = 14 * 25.5. This is less than the desired sum.

Re: The sum of the positive integers from 1 to 27 is equivalent [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 May 2016, 08:41

Stiv wrote:

The sum of the positive integers from 1 to 27 is equivalent to the sum of the integers from

A. -27 to 54 B. 0 to 28 C. 15 to 45 D. 38 to 46 E. 48 to 54

Sum of integers from 1 to 27= 27*28/2= 27*14 (Units digit will be 8)

A. -27 to 54 Effectively it will be sum of integers from 28 to 54 (It will definitely be greater than the sum of integers from 1 to 27)

B. 0 to 28 Integer 28 will be added more to the sum of integers from 1 to 27

C. 15 to 45 There are total 31 integers, and by looking closely at the numbers, we realize that most of the numbers are greater than 27 and hence the sum will also be greater

D. 38 to 46

By adding units digit of given numbers (8+9+0+1+2+3+4+5+6), we get 8 as the unit digit of resulting number. This is the answer.

E. 48 to 54 We do not get 8 as unit digit in this case as we got in option D _________________

I welcome critical analysis of my post!! That will help me reach 700+

The sum of the positive integers from 1 to 27 is equivalent to the sum of the integers from

A. -27 to 54 B. 0 to 28 C. 15 to 45 D. 38 to 46 E. 48 to 54

Hi,

the property which I will use is that SUM of consecutive integers is Number of imtegers * average or center number.. sum of the positive integers from 1 to 27 = 27 * \frac{1+27}{2} = 27*14... so the sum has to be EVEN and multiple of 7 and 27..

lets see the choices-

A. -27 to 54 ---------number of integers = 27+54+1 = 82.. this means the SUM will be multiple of PRIME 41... NO

B. 0 to 28-----------number of integers = 28+1 = 29.. this means the SUM will be multiple of PRIME 29... NO

C. 15 to 45-----------number of integers = 45-15+1 = 31.. this means the SUM will be multiple of PRIME 31... NO

D. 38 to 46-----------number of integers = 46-38+1 = 9..so we see the average now =\(\frac{46+38}{2}= 42\)..this means the SUM will be =9*42 = 9*6*7 = 27*14...YES

E. 48 to 54-----------number of integers = 54-48+1 = 7.... so we see the average now =\(\frac{48+54}{2}= 51\)..this means the SUM will be =51*7 OR an ODD number and also not a multiple of 27...NO

The sum of the positive integers from 1 to 27 is equivalent [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Oct 2016, 18:52

Stiv wrote:

The sum of the positive integers from 1 to 27 is equivalent to the sum of the integers from

A. -27 to 54 B. 0 to 28 C. 15 to 45 D. 38 to 46 E. 48 to 54

i did the direct way...and it took more than 2 minutes... A -> from 1 to 27 is 27*28/2 = 378. since we have -27, it's -378. -27 is inclusive, so subtract from -378-27, and get -351. sum from 0 to 54 = 54*55/2 = 27*55 -> last digit is 5...since we would add with -351, the last digit would be 4...so not good. B -> 0 to 28 -> 28*29/2 = 14*29 -> way too big. C -> sum from 0 to 14 = 14*15/2 = 7*15 = XX5. 0 to 45 is 45*46 = 23*45 -> last digit is 5. since we would subtract XX5, the last digit would be 0 and not 8. out. D -> from 0 to 37 = 37*38/2 = 37*19 = smth smth last digit =3. 46*47/2 = 23*47 -> last digit =1. hm...if XX1 - XX3 -> we'll get last digit 8..this might be the answer... E -> from 0 to 47 = 47*48/2 = 47*29 -> last digit is 3 (smth XX3). 0 to 54 = 54*55/2 = 27*55 = XX5..last digit 5...from 5 subtract 3 and get 2..we need 8 looks like only D works!

Re: The sum of the positive integers from 1 to 27 is equivalent [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Aug 2017, 00:36

The sum of consecutive integers is given by n(n+1)/2...so how to calculate as per this?

acc to me,a option says -27 to 54,in which -26 to 26 will eventually cancel and remaining sum for 27 to 53 inclusive with 27 terms comes out to be 27*28/2...27*14 which is what coming previously(in the question)

Re: The sum of the positive integers from 1 to 27 is equivalent [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Aug 2017, 00:43

chetan2u wrote:

Stiv wrote:

The sum of the positive integers from 1 to 27 is equivalent to the sum of the integers from

A. -27 to 54 B. 0 to 28 C. 15 to 45 D. 38 to 46 E. 48 to 54

Hi,

the property which I will use is that SUM of consecutive integers is Number of imtegers * average or center number.. sum of the positive integers from 1 to 27 = 27 * \frac{1+27}{2} = 27*14... so the sum has to be EVEN and multiple of 7 and 27..

lets see the choices-

A. -27 to 54 ---------number of integers = 27+54+1 = 82.. this means the SUM will be multiple of PRIME 41... NO

B. 0 to 28-----------number of integers = 28+1 = 29.. this means the SUM will be multiple of PRIME 29... NO

C. 15 to 45-----------number of integers = 45-15+1 = 31.. this means the SUM will be multiple of PRIME 31... NO

D. 38 to 46-----------number of integers = 46-38+1 = 9..so we see the average now =\(\frac{46+38}{2}= 42\)..this means the SUM will be =9*42 = 9*6*7 = 27*14...YES

E. 48 to 54-----------number of integers = 54-48+1 = 7.... so we see the average now =\(\frac{48+54}{2}= 51\)..this means the SUM will be =51*7 OR an ODD number and also not a multiple of 27...NO

D

should we always consider the range as inclusive,even when not specified?

Version 8.1 of the WordPress for Android app is now available, with some great enhancements to publishing: background media uploading. Adding images to a post or page? Now...

Post today is short and sweet for my MBA batchmates! We survived Foundations term, and tomorrow's the start of our Term 1! I'm sharing my pre-MBA notes...

“Keep your head down, and work hard. Don’t attract any attention. You should be grateful to be here.” Why do we keep quiet? Being an immigrant is a constant...