Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 10:08 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 10:08

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Retired Moderator
Joined: 28 Nov 2019
Posts: 223
Own Kudos [?]: 124 [1]
Given Kudos: 90
Location: India
Schools: ISB '24 Imperial
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Jul 2023
Posts: 128
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 281
Location: India
GPA: 3.46
Send PM
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13960
Own Kudos [?]: 32911 [0]
Given Kudos: 5778
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Jul 2023
Posts: 128
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 281
Location: India
GPA: 3.46
Send PM
Re: The table gives various specifications of five sport utility vehicles [#permalink]
Sajjad1994 wrote:
Its_me_aka_ak wrote:
Please explain how statement 2 is true as it seems like there is a negligibly positive relation b/w the parameters


138-7

120-8 (Power decreases seating capacity increased. Relation: Negative)

169-7 (Power Increases seating capacity Decreased. Relation: Negative)

187-5 (Power increases seating capacity deccreased. Relation: Negative)

188-5 (Power slightly increases seating capacity same. Relation: undefined)

Hence Overall, a negative correlation exists.

OOPS, i accidentally considered Width as the comparable parameter and got confused.
i am realizing how these minor mistakes can cost me a lot in the exam.
Thanks Sajjad
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Apr 2022
Posts: 11
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 79
Send PM
Re: The table gives various specifications of five sport utility vehicles [#permalink]
how is the first question false when we can see that as the size increases the mileage decreases Sajjad1994?
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13960
Own Kudos [?]: 32911 [0]
Given Kudos: 5778
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: The table gives various specifications of five sport utility vehicles [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Sandesh013 wrote:
how is the first question false when we can see that as the size increases the mileage decreases Sajjad1994?


No! we can't see that. The OVERALL relationship is positive. Do not go too detailed.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 Mar 2022
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [1]
Given Kudos: 52
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V28
Send PM
Re: The table gives various specifications of five sport utility vehicles [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Hi Sajjad,

Correct me if I'm wrong for statement 1.
The overall size of the car is (LxBxW) , which i found max for Escado & min for Armageddon.
The mileage for these cars is 13.7 & 9.9.
So, the mileage seems to be decreasing. It seems to be negative correlation.

Thanks
Nitin
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The table gives various specifications of five sport utility vehicles [#permalink]
Moderators:
Math Expert
92914 posts
DI Forum Moderator
1031 posts
RC & DI Moderator
11178 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne