Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 14:21 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 14:21
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
gmatnub
Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Last visit: 23 Dec 2008
Posts: 393
Own Kudos:
1,657
 [61]
Posts: 393
Kudos: 1,657
 [61]
10
Kudos
Add Kudos
50
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
JusTLucK04
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 17 Sep 2013
Last visit: 27 Jul 2017
Posts: 272
Own Kudos:
1,351
 [17]
Given Kudos: 139
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V38
WE:Analyst (Consulting)
Products:
12
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KyleWiddison
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 30 Apr 2012
Last visit: 06 Jul 2016
Posts: 781
Own Kudos:
2,684
 [11]
Given Kudos: 5
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 781
Kudos: 2,684
 [11]
10
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,360
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatnub
The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant, returned to the sea some 50 million years ago. These thousand-pound herbivores inhabit the warm coastal waters where Americans like to play. Despite conservation efforts, criminal penalties for harming these creatures, and an overabundance of SAVE THE MANATEE! bumper stickers, none of these animals can be considered safe.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument above?

(A) Last year, several manatees were mysteriously killed by an unidentified toxin.

(B) All manatees swim at depths that make them vulnerable to the blades of motorboat engines.

(C) Most tourists are unaware of the ongoing efforts to save the manatee.

(D) The population of manatees in the wild has dwindled to fewer than 2,500 animals.

(E) Although dozens of manatee deaths are documented each year, many more deaths go unreported.

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION



The argument concludes that, despite numerous protections, none of the manatees can be considered safe. The correct answer choice must support the assertion that all manatees are threatened.

(A) The deaths of several manatees from a specific toxin in no way indicates that all manatees are unsafe.

(B) CORRECT. This choice explicitly states that all manatees put themselves in harm’s way by swimming at depths that make them vulnerable to the blades of motorboat engines.

(C) The awareness of programs to save the manatee is irrelevant to the argument.

(D) The simple fact that a limited number of manatees remains in the wild in no way suggests that every one of the 2,500 remaining manatees is threatened.

(E) The deaths each year of a number of manatees, whether documented or undocumented, do not indicate that all living manatees are threatened.
General Discussion
User avatar
alpha_plus_gamma
Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Last visit: 17 Jun 2010
Posts: 298
Own Kudos:
631
 [3]
Concentration: MC, PE, VC
Posts: 298
Kudos: 631
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatnub
The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant, returned to the sea some 50 million years ago. These thousand-pound herbivores inhabit the warm coastal waters where Americans like to play. Despite conservation efforts, criminal penalties for harming these creatures, and an overabundance of SAVE THE MANATEE! bumper stickers, none of these animals can be considered safe.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument above?


a) Last year, several manatees were mysteriously killed by an unidentified toxin.
(this talks only about last year)

b) All manatees swim at depths that make them vulnerable to the blades of motorboat engines.
(possible, passage doesn't state anything being done for motorboats)

c) Most tourists are unaware of the ongoing efforts to save the manatee.
(if thers "an overabundance of SAVE THE MANATEE! bumper stickers" then this doesn't seem right)

d) The population of manatees in the wild has dwindled to fewer than 2,500 animals.
(we don't know what was the original population)

E) Although dozens of manatee deaths are documented each year, many more deaths go unreported.
(though this is relevant , it does not help to fill in the gap between "efforts being done" & "still considered unsafe" )

B for me
User avatar
vc019
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Last visit: 19 Oct 2010
Posts: 262
Own Kudos:
35
 [1]
Posts: 262
Kudos: 35
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My line of thought -

Conclusion - Despite conservation efforts, criminal penalties for harming these creatures, and an overabundance of SAVE THE MANATEE! bumper stickers, none of these animals can be considered safe

Premise - These thousand-pound herbivores inhabit the warm coastal waters where Americans like to play.


Lets look at the options.

a) Last year, several manatees were mysteriously killed by an unidentified toxin.
Does not support the premise or conclusion.
b) All manatees swim at depths that make them vulnerable to the blades of motorboat engines.
Supports the premise.
c) Most tourists are unaware of the ongoing efforts to save the manatee.
Does not support the conclusion.As the argument mentions that there are lot bumper stickers.
d) The population of manatees in the wild has dwindled to fewer than 2,500 animals.
Out of context.
E) Although dozens of manatee deaths are documented each year, many more deaths go unreported.
Does not support the conclusion.


Hence B is the answer.
User avatar
bhatiagp
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Last visit: 06 Jan 2021
Posts: 371
Own Kudos:
116
 [1]
Concentration: General Management , Strategy
Products:
Posts: 371
Kudos: 116
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My answer to this would be B.

A) is out of context,
C) contradicts the premise
d) out of context
e) out of context
User avatar
ronr34
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Last visit: 10 Oct 2014
Posts: 248
Own Kudos:
250
 [2]
Given Kudos: 58
Posts: 248
Kudos: 250
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
JusTLucK04
The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant, returned to the sea some 50 million years ago. These thousand-pound herbivores inhabit the warm coastal waters where Americans like to play. Despite conservation efforts, criminal penalties for harming these creatures, and an overabundance of SAVE THE MANATEE! bumper stickers, none of these animals can be considered safe.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument above?

A) Last year, several manatees were mysteriously killed by an unidentified toxin.
B) All manatees swim at depths that make them vulnerable to the blades of motorboat engines.
C) Most tourists are unaware of the ongoing efforts to save the manatee.
D) The population of manatees in the wild has dwindled to fewer than 2,500 animals.
E) Although dozens of manatee deaths are documented each year, many more deaths go unreported.

B it is

Criminal Penalties,Conservation efforts,SAVE them stickers...Although Enough is being done through awareness, the animals are still not safe.So something not to do with lack of awareness etc.

A- Just because of a separate incidence you cannot conclude that they are unsafe.We cannot say that this will occur again & hence the Manatees are unsafe...Rejected
B- Lives Near Coastal Water where US ppl play--> Swim at boat level--> Although people aware they harm them unconsciously--> Can be a probable answer
C- Tourists are unaware.But how does it matter.Nothing about them hurting the manatees or about tourists frequently visiting the coasts is mentioned in the argument...Rejected
D- Number- Irrelevant-What if there are 100000000 manatees..Rejected
E- Deaths go unreported- We don't know the cause of the death- Is it natural or man made- Rejected
B for me too although it's really more that there was nothing better....
No one said that there are even boats in that area....
So, if not, this argument would be irrelevant.
User avatar
Cadaver
Joined: 03 Oct 2014
Last visit: 09 Oct 2018
Posts: 114
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 89
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Technology
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V40
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V40
Posts: 114
Kudos: 101
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How could something so irrelevant to the argument serve as a strengthener.

"Despite conservation efforts, criminal penalties for harming these creatures" rules out the probability that motorboats can harm Manatees as extra care will be taken to protect them.

But option A gives a fair enough reason to strengthen argument
avatar
Charlesalex
Joined: 18 Jan 2015
Last visit: 08 Aug 2015
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
2
 [2]
Posts: 3
Kudos: 2
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Satyarath
How could something so irrelevant to the argument serve as a strengthener.

"Despite conservation efforts, criminal penalties for harming these creatures" rules out the probability that motorboats can harm Manatees as extra care will be taken to protect them.

But option A gives a fair enough reason to strengthen argument

Satyarath, I answered "A" as well. I think you and I made the assumption that because there is more campaigns around their safety, that boaters will undoubtedly have had to taken measures to be safer, so we can in effect rule out "B".

I think it more has something to do with the fact that the question states that "none" of these animals can be considered safe in the conclusion. If a few get a rare disease, that doesn't mean that none are safe. Those few/several could have been a unique subset in a secluded environment. But if all mantetees swim at boat level near propellers, then none can be considered safe due to risk of injury from boat propellers.
User avatar
souvik101990
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Last visit: 11 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,321
Own Kudos:
53,093
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2,326
Location: United States (WA)
Concentration: Leadership, General Management
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V42 (Online)
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42 (Online)
GPA: 3.8
WE:Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42 (Online)
Posts: 4,321
Kudos: 53,093
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer choice A says that some manatees died from the toxin. I cannot logically conclude from that that ALL manatees are at risk. I just don't know that. It may be that only some are susceptible to the toxin.

On the other hand, if every single manatee is at risk of getting run over by a boat, then ALL manatees are at risk.
avatar
devikeerthan
Joined: 21 Jun 2015
Last visit: 26 Sep 2017
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
30
 [2]
Given Kudos: 28
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V30
GPA: 3.32
WE:Programming (Computer Software)
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V30
Posts: 27
Kudos: 30
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Charlesalex
Satyarath
How could something so irrelevant to the argument serve as a strengthener.

"Despite conservation efforts, criminal penalties for harming these creatures" rules out the probability that motorboats can harm Manatees as extra care will be taken to protect them.

But option A gives a fair enough reason to strengthen argument

Satyarath, I answered "A" as well. I think you and I made the assumption that because there is more campaigns around their safety, that boaters will undoubtedly have had to taken measures to be safer, so we can in effect rule out "B".

I think it more has something to do with the fact that the question states that "none" of these animals can be considered safe in the conclusion. If a few get a rare disease, that doesn't mean that none are safe. Those few/several could have been a unique subset in a secluded environment. But if all mantetees swim at boat level near propellers, then none can be considered safe due to risk of injury from boat propellers.


A does not talk about all the manatees here. Several are killed because of chemicals. how many? Example: There were 1000 manatees. 100 were killed because of chemicals. 200 manatees were born. after 1 year number is 1100. The number has increased! A is wrong. B is the answer
User avatar
MishalSen1
Joined: 01 Mar 2022
Last visit: 27 Aug 2024
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 21
Location: India
Posts: 12
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­For me it was between A and B. 

A talks about a toxin - we know that Americans like to play in these waters. so if Americans play here it should be considered to be safe overall and this incident might be an isolated one. 

B is the winner
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,829
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,829
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts