Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 61470

Three coworkers P, Q, and R met for a dinner. P bought 5 sandwiches, Q
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Nov 2019, 03:45
Question Stats:
50% (02:40) correct 50% (02:27) wrong based on 241 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Three coworkers P, Q, and R met for a dinner. P bought 5 sandwiches, Q bought 3 sandwiches and R bought none. Both P and Q shared their sandwiches with R such that each got the same amount. If R paid a total of $8 to P and Q, how much of $8 should P get? Assume both sandwiches and Dollars can be split. (A) $3 (B) $4 (C) $5 (D) $5.5 (E) $7 Are You Up For the Challenge: 700 Level Questions: 700 Level Questions
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________



GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Posts: 5911
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GPA: 4
WE: Marketing (Energy and Utilities)

Three coworkers P, Q, and R met for a dinner. P bought 5 sandwiches, Q
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 01 Nov 2019, 06:36
Bunuel wrote: Three coworkers P, Q, and R met for a dinner. P bought 5 sandwiches, Q bought 3 sandwiches and R bought none. Both P and Q shared their sandwiches with R such that each got the same amount. If R paid a total of $8 to P and Q, how much of $8 should P get? Assume both sandwiches and Dollars can be split.
(A) $3 (B) $4 (C) $5 (D) $5.5 (E) $7 total sandwiches ; 8 when shared equally each must have had 8/3 each R paid ; 8/8/3 ; 3$ for sandwich sandwiches which P ate ; 8/3 so he should get money of 58/3 ; 7/3 7/3*3 = 7$ IMO E
Originally posted by Archit3110 on 01 Nov 2019, 04:05.
Last edited by Archit3110 on 01 Nov 2019, 06:36, edited 1 time in total.



Manager
Joined: 31 Oct 2015
Posts: 95

Three coworkers P, Q, and R met for a dinner. P bought 5 sandwiches, Q
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Nov 2019, 06:28
The answer is E.
Each of them ate \(\frac{8}{3}\) sandwiches.
Since R paid $8 for \frac{8}{3} sandwiches , price of 1 sandwich is \(8*\frac{3}{8}= 3$\)
P should get back from R what P did not eat i.e \(5\frac{8}{3} = \frac{7}{3} of sandwich\)
Therefore Money P should get back is \(\frac{7}{3}*3 = 7$\)



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 8254

Re: Three coworkers P, Q, and R met for a dinner. P bought 5 sandwiches, Q
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Nov 2019, 07:43
Bunuel wrote: Three coworkers P, Q, and R met for a dinner. P bought 5 sandwiches, Q bought 3 sandwiches and R bought none. Both P and Q shared their sandwiches with R such that each got the same amount. If R paid a total of $8 to P and Q, how much of $8 should P get? Assume both sandwiches and Dollars can be split. (A) $3 (B) $4 (C) $5 (D) $5.5 (E) $7 Are You Up For the Challenge: 700 Level Questions: 700 Level Questions P, Q and R can equally share 8 sandwiches by getting \(\frac{8}{3}\) Cost of \(\frac{8}{3}\) is 8$, so cost of 1 sandwich = \(8*\frac{3}{8}=3\)$ P gives 5\(\frac{8}{3} =\frac{7}{3}\) to R, and price of \(\frac{7}{3}=3*\frac{7}{3}=7\)$ E
_________________



VP
Joined: 20 Jul 2017
Posts: 1331
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Marketing
WE: Education (Education)

Re: Three coworkers P, Q, and R met for a dinner. P bought 5 sandwiches, Q
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Nov 2019, 23:31
Bunuel wrote: Three coworkers P, Q, and R met for a dinner. P bought 5 sandwiches, Q bought 3 sandwiches and R bought none. Both P and Q shared their sandwiches with R such that each got the same amount. If R paid a total of $8 to P and Q, how much of $8 should P get? Assume both sandwiches and Dollars can be split. (A) $3 (B) $4 (C) $5 (D) $5.5 (E) $7 Are You Up For the Challenge: 700 Level Questions: 700 Level QuestionsTotal sandwiches = 8 Each got same number = 8/3 R paid $8 for 8/3 sandwiches —> Ratio of share of P:Q = (58/3) : (38/3) = 7/3 : 1/3 = 7 : 1 —> Share of P in $ = 7/(7+1)*8 = $7 IMO Option E Posted from my mobile device



SVP
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Posts: 2019
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
WE: Engineering (Transportation)

Re: Three coworkers P, Q, and R met for a dinner. P bought 5 sandwiches, Q
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Nov 2019, 08:38
Bunuel wrote: Three coworkers P, Q, and R met for a dinner. P bought 5 sandwiches, Q bought 3 sandwiches and R bought none. Both P and Q shared their sandwiches with R such that each got the same amount. If R paid a total of $8 to P and Q, how much of $8 should P get? Assume both sandwiches and Dollars can be split. (A) $3 (B) $4 (C) $5 (D) $5.5 (E) $7 Are You Up For the Challenge: 700 Level Questions: 700 Level QuestionsTotal sandwiches = 5+ 3 = 8 Sandwich for each P, Q & R = 8/3 P bought extra sandwich = 5  8/3 = 7/3 Q bought extra sandwich = 3  8/3 = 1/3 Total money paid to P & Q = $8 Ratio of money to P : money to Q = 7/3 : 1/3 = 7:1 Money that P should get = $7 IMO E



Intern
Joined: 07 Apr 2019
Posts: 31

Three coworkers P, Q, and R met for a dinner. P bought 5 sandwiches, Q
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Nov 2019, 20:06
Hi experts, I came across a strange concept (tied with a question below) written somewhere not official. Wanted to check with you if that is a correct way to calculating. We have ratios of History:geography scores for 5 students: GMATNinja (0.8) , nightblade354 (0.35) , VeritasKarishma (0.9) chetan2u (1.25) and Bunuel (0.9). By what percentage did Bunuel score more than @Nightblae354 in History? Solution: Assuming Nightblade's score as 35:100 and Bunuel's as 90:100 [based on ratios], Bunuel scored : 55/35 * 100 = 57.14% more. This solution comes from an unofficial GMAT tutor. However, I wanted to see its validity, coz it was quite fascinating to me. Is this a correct way to compute?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 8254

Re: Three coworkers P, Q, and R met for a dinner. P bought 5 sandwiches, Q
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Nov 2019, 20:30
deeeuce wrote: Hi experts, I came across a strange concept (tied with a question below) written somewhere not official. Wanted to check with you if that is a correct way to calculating. We have ratios of History:geography scores for 5 students: GMATNinja (0.8) , nightblade354 (0.35) , VeritasKarishma (0.9) chetan2u (1.25) and Bunuel (0.9). By what percentage did Bunuel score more than @Nightblae354 in History? Solution: Assuming Nightblade's score as 35:100 and Bunuel's as 90:100 [based on ratios], Bunuel scored : 55/35 * 100 = 57.14% more. This solution comes from an unofficial GMAT tutor. However, I wanted to see its validity, coz it was quite fascinating to me. Is this a correct way to compute? No, this would not be correct. Yes if they have got same score in geography then ok. B got 81 and 90 in geography, while N got 31.5 and 90 in geography. So % more =(8131.5)/31.5*100=5000/31.5=157%. But say B got 9 in history and 10 in geography, while N got 35 and 100 respectively. Here B has got lesser marks than N in history.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 07 Apr 2019
Posts: 31

Three coworkers P, Q, and R met for a dinner. P bought 5 sandwiches, Q
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Nov 2019, 21:09
chetan2u wrote: deeeuce wrote: Hi experts, I came across a strange concept (tied with a question below) written somewhere not official. Wanted to check with you if that is a correct way to calculating. We have ratios of History:geography scores for 5 students: GMATNinja (0.8) , nightblade354 (0.35) , VeritasKarishma (0.9) chetan2u (1.25) and Bunuel (0.9). By what percentage did Bunuel score more than @Nightblae354 in History? Solution: Assuming Nightblade's score as 35:100 and Bunuel's as 90:100 [based on ratios], Bunuel scored : 55/35 * 100 = 57.14% more. This solution comes from an unofficial GMAT tutor. However, I wanted to see its validity, coz it was quite fascinating to me. Is this a correct way to compute? No, this would not be correct. Yes if they have got same score in geography then ok. B got 81 and 90 in geography, while N got 31.5 and 90 in geography. So % more =(8131.5)/31.5*100=5000/31.5=157%. But say B got 9 in history and 10 in geography, while N got 35 and 100 respectively. Here B has got lesser marks than N in history. Hi chetan2u : thanks for the prompt response. Got your point. So can we generalize that if only ratio is provided there is no way to calculate percentage increase or the absolute value it self just by the ratio? Thanks.



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 10113
Location: Pune, India

Re: Three coworkers P, Q, and R met for a dinner. P bought 5 sandwiches, Q
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Nov 2019, 21:16
deeeuce wrote: Hi experts, I came across a strange concept (tied with a question below) written somewhere not official. Wanted to check with you if that is a correct way to calculating. We have ratios of History:geography scores for 5 students: GMATNinja (0.8) , nightblade354 (0.35) , VeritasKarishma (0.9) chetan2u (1.25) and Bunuel (0.9). By what percentage did Bunuel score more than @Nightblae354 in History? Solution: Assuming Nightblade's score as 35:100 and Bunuel's as 90:100 [based on ratios], Bunuel scored : 55/35 * 100 = 57.14% more. This solution comes from an unofficial GMAT tutor. However, I wanted to see its validity, coz it was quite fascinating to me. Is this a correct way to compute? Remember that different ratios have different multipliers. Whenever in doubt, assign multipliers to the ratios and check. N's ratio = .35 = 35:100 So N's History marks = 35a N's Geography marks = 100a B's ratio = 0.9 = 90:100 So B's History marks = 90b B's Geography marks = 100b By what % did B score more than N in History? = (90b  35a)/35a * 100 Now, since you cannot get rid of the variables, you cannot get a unique value for this.
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >



CrackVerbal Quant Expert
Joined: 12 Apr 2019
Posts: 391

Re: Three coworkers P, Q, and R met for a dinner. P bought 5 sandwiches, Q
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Nov 2019, 06:04
Although this question is one on Word problems, it also has strong undercurrents of Ratio concepts based on which you need to solve this question. Instead of solving it the usual way of dividing the total of 8 sandwiches among 3 people and dealing with fractions, I’d like to take an approach where I can use integer values and the concept of money because both these concepts can be easily understood and it will make you more confident with such questions. The total number of sandwiches is 8; we need to divide this among 3 persons. It’s very clear that this involves uneven division by 3. So, to make it simple, let us take the cost of one sandwich to be $3. This means that the total value of the 8 sandwiches is $24, of which $15 was contributed by P and $9 was contributed by Q. R did not contribute anything but still ended up getting an equal share. What does this mean? It means that he got an equal share of the total value $24 which comes to $8. This also means that the other two persons P and Q saw their respective shares being reduced to $8 since they were magnanimous enough to share their sandwiches with R. Q’s share was 9 and it went down to 8. This means, he should have given $1 to R (or in other words, \(\frac{1}{3}\)rd of a sandwich to R). P’s share was 15 and it went down to 8. This means, he should have given $7 to R (or in other words, \(\frac{7}{3}\)rd of a sandwich to R). See how the sum of 7/3 and 1/3 gives you 8/3 which is the value you would have obtained even if you took the traditional approach of dividing 8 by 3. Since R paid $8 to P and Q and the money needs to be split in the ratio of the sandwiches they shared with R, it only means that P got $7 and Q got $1. The correct answer option is E. A point to note is that it’s wrong to assume that the money given by R to P and Q was divided uniformly among them. Do not make this mistake, or option B is waiting for you. Hope that helps!
_________________



VP
Joined: 18 Dec 2017
Posts: 1122
Location: United States (KS)
GMAT 1: 600 Q46 V27

Re: Three coworkers P, Q, and R met for a dinner. P bought 5 sandwiches, Q
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Dec 2019, 06:47
Quote: P, Q and R can equally share 8 sandwiches by getting \(\frac{8}{3}\)
Cost of \(\frac{8}{3}\) is 8$, so cost of 1 sandwich = \(8*\frac{3}{8}=3\)$
P gives 5\(\frac{8}{3} =\frac{7}{3}\) to R, and price of \(\frac{7}{3}=3*\frac{7}{3}=7\)$
E chetan2uI still have a doubt. "Both P and Q shared their sandwiches with R such that each got the same amount" From this we deduce R gets 8/3. That's fine. P gives (58/3) and Q gives (38/3) but then at the end all 3 don't have the same amount.
_________________
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long Learn from the Legend himself: All GMAT Ninja LIVE YouTube videos by topicYou are missing on great learning if you don't know what this is: Project SC Butler



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 8254

Re: Three coworkers P, Q, and R met for a dinner. P bought 5 sandwiches, Q
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Dec 2019, 08:11
TheNightKing wrote: Quote: P, Q and R can equally share 8 sandwiches by getting \(\frac{8}{3}\)
Cost of \(\frac{8}{3}\) is 8$, so cost of 1 sandwich = \(8*\frac{3}{8}=3\)$
P gives 5\(\frac{8}{3} =\frac{7}{3}\) to R, and price of \(\frac{7}{3}=3*\frac{7}{3}=7\)$
E chetan2uI still have a doubt. "Both P and Q shared their sandwiches with R such that each got the same amount" From this we deduce R gets 8/3. That's fine. P gives (58/3) and Q gives (38/3) but then at the end all 3 don't have the same amount. P gives R 58/3 or 7/3 and he has 8/3 after giving 7/3 Q gives R 38/3 or 1/3 and he has 8/3 after giving 1/3 R now has 7/3+1/3=8/3 So all three get 8/3
_________________




Re: Three coworkers P, Q, and R met for a dinner. P bought 5 sandwiches, Q
[#permalink]
01 Dec 2019, 08:11






