To protect certain fledgling industries, the government of country Z b

Question

To protect certain fledgling industries, the government of country Z banned imports of the types of products those industries were starting to make. As a direct result, the cost of those products to the buyers, several export-dependent industries in Z, went up, sharply limiting the ability of those industries to compete effectively in their export markets.

Which of the following can be most properly inferred from the passage about the products whose importation was banned?

(A) Those products had been cheaper to import than they were to make within country Z's fledgling industries.

(B) Those products were ones that country Z was hoping to export in its turn, once the fledgling industries matured.

(C) Those products used to be imported from just those countries to which country Z's exports went.

(D) Those products had become more and more expensive to import, which resulted in a foreign trade deficit just before the ban.

(E) Those products used to be imported in very small quantities, but they were essential to country Z's economy.

Source : GMATPREP Default Exam Pack
Another question based on the same passage: https://gmatclub.com/forum/to-protect-c ... 12491.html

Show Answer

Official Answer

A

jallenmorris · Accepted Answer

A. See explanation next to each answer...

devbond · Answer

So this question basically talks about two types of industries.

1)Local Fledgling Industries
2)Export Dependent Industries,who are being forced to buy products from local industries now.

Government puts a ban on importing products which are being made by the local fledgling industries -->Cost of the those products increases as the competition decreases.Hence the (2)Export dependent industries have a problem competing as now they have to buy the same product at an inflated cost, which makes them less profitable.

Ans is A

bblast · Answer

I know this has been discussed a million times. Even I got this correct. But M just a little skeptical that are we not being asked to infer too much here. Are we not required to limit our answer selection in inference question only to the information in the premises presented in the passage ?

amit2k9 · Answer

choice A gives the reason / hidden assumption behind the cost going up due to the ban posed on the import of such products.

A it is.

Warlock007 · Answer

answer to the question 1

I would go for A.

the question tells that in order to protect the domestic industries . the govt banned imports. which implies that import products were cheaper than domestic products, otherwise why will be the goverment try to protect the fledgling industries. . thus once these imports are stopped naturally the cost to the buyer/expoters will be high in the doemstic market.

A clearly brings this out.

now Question no 2 from the same passage
Which of the following conclusions about country Z’s adversely affected export-dependent industries is best supported by the passage?

(A) Profit margins in those industries were not high enough to absorb the rise in costs mentioned above.

(B) Those industries had to contend with the fact that other countries banned imports from country Z.

(C) Those industries succeeded in expanding the domestic market for their products.

(D) Steps to offset rising materials costs by decreasing labor costs were taken in those industries.

(E) Those industries started to move into export markets that they had previously judged unprofitable.

please post your replies........

jabgars · Answer

For the 2nd line, shouldn't the 2nd coma be "and" ?
Which industries is referred to by "those"?

"As a direct result, the cost of those products to the buyers ,  several export-dependent industries in Z, went up, sharply limiting the ability of  those  industries to compete effectively in their export markets."

Shiv2016 · Answer

To protect certain fledgling industries, the government of country Z banned imports of the types of products  those   (FLEDGLING INDUSTRIES)  industries were starting to make. As a direct result, the cost of those products to the buyers, several export-dependent industries in Z, went up, sharply limiting the ability of  those   (export-dependent industries in Z)  industries to compete effectively in their export markets.

CAUSE 
Purpose of government of country Z: To protect certain fledgling industries
Action taken by the government to achieve their purpose: the government of country Z banned imports of the types of products  those   (FLEDGLING INDUSTRIES)  industries were starting to make.

EFFECT

Result: the cost of those products to the buyers, several export-dependent industries in Z, went up, sharply limiting the ability of  those   (export-dependent industries in Z)  industries to compete effectively in their export markets.

uchihaitachi · Answer

Suppose you are building a product that costs 10$ and you import the same product that costs 7$ Now, if imports are not stopped, then your product becomes hard to sell. 
But what has happened now that the customers are forced to buy the 10$ product. Now this product has to be exported and since the cost has gone up, the duty added in the buyer country will even hurt the buyer more.And they will not prefer the more costly product. So, in a way the argument says that if the imported products were allowed that would have been better rather than making the product in Z's fledgling industries.

Option A becomes the answer.

(A) Those products had been cheaper to import than they were to make within country Z's fledgling industries.

This is a far fetched inference. Eliminated

We do not get any idea from the argument of such exchange. Eliminated

Trade deficit is bringing in outside knowledge. Do you know which country are they talking about? NO. Eliminated

Again, how do we know that they were essential to Z's economy. Eliminated

emcheeks · Answer

To protect certain fledgling industries, the government of country Z banned imports of the types of products those industries were starting to make. As a direct result, the cost of those products to the buyers, several export-dependent industries in Z, went up, sharply limiting the ability of those industries to compete effectively in their export markets.

Which of the following can be most properly inferred from the passage about the products whose importation was banned?

(A) Those products had been cheaper to import than they were to make within country Z's fledgling industries.

Since it is banned to import these products, buyers in export-dependent industries have to buy these products within the country Z. We know from the passage that these buyers are paying more for the products. Therefore, we can infer that the products made in country Z is more expensive than the imports which buyers used to purchase for a lower price. 
 
(B) Those products were ones that country Z was hoping to export in its turn, once the fledgling industries matured.

We know Z has been relied on imports on these products before. But we do not know whether country Z is going to export these products or not in the future.
 
(C) Those products used to be imported from just those countries to which country Z's exports went.

This is a minor detail of the export : where the export came from or went. This is the detail we do not know, or in other words, cannot be inferred from the passage.

(D) Those products had become more and more expensive to import, which resulted in a foreign trade deficit just before the ban.

We do not know whether these products will become more expensive, nor it can be inferred. In addition, we can infer that the import should be cheap, but D is saying that it is expensive.

(E) Those products used to be imported in very small quantities, but they were essential to country Z's economy.

We do not know if it was essential to the economy nor inferred this from the passage.

Ilhomjon98 · Answer

Hi  IanStewart

Could you please help with this question?

We are only told that "several export-dependent industries" are paying higher prices for products made in country Z than those for imported ones.

Let's say that fledgling industries spend $50 to make some product and sell it for $100, whereas an imported product costs $80.
Export-dependent industries are paying higher prices for the products made in country Z. If my reasoning is correct, then A cannot be correct.

So, How can we conclude (A) ?

I think (A) should say that 
  Those products had been cheaper to import than they were to  buy from  country Z's fledgling industries.

Could you please explain Why (A) is correct?

Thank you very much beforehand!

IanStewart · Answer

Yes, you make a good point -- all we can infer is that the cost to buy these products became higher within country Z after their import was banned. So the sales price of those products is higher when the products are made domestically than when they are imported. Answer A bizarrely seems to compare the sales price of an imported product with the cost to manufacture the product domestically, but that manufacturing cost isn't what matters here -- what matters is how much the product sells for.

So answer A really should be better-worded. I'd still choose it, since answers B through E are clearly not valid inferences, and A could perhaps be valid if you interpret "to make within" in a very liberal way. Still, this is a very old question, written by the previous test developer, and I find the newer questions are generally higher-quality (both in Quant and in Verbal), so you hopefully won't see any current questions with similarly problematic "correct" answers.

yalembagrad · Answer

“Starting to make” threw me off because it could mean they don’t have enough capacity yet to mean demand and haven’t fully started

Posted from my mobile device

egmat · Answer

An inference question about Country Z's trade policies- a classic GMAT pattern where protectionist policies create unintended consequences - let's break it down together.

Understanding the Situation

Think of it this way: Country Z's government wanted to help its new industries (let's say, domestic steel producers). So they banned steel imports. But here's the problem - the export industries (like car manufacturers) who were buying cheaper imported steel now  must  buy more expensive domestic steel. This directly increased their production costs.

The Core Logic Chain

Let's trace what happened step by step:

Step 1:  Import ban enacted → Eliminates cheaper foreign alternatives
 Step 2:  Export industries forced to buy domestic → Costs go up
 Step 3:  Higher costs → "Sharply limited" ability to compete in export markets

Notice how the passage uses "sharply limited" - that's strong language. If these companies could have just absorbed the higher costs through their profit margins, would their competitiveness have been  sharply  limited? Probably not.

Evaluating the Answer Choices

(A)  Says profit margins weren't high enough to absorb the cost increases. 
This makes perfect sense! If they  could  absorb the costs, they wouldn't be struggling to compete. The fact that their export competitiveness was "sharply limited" tells us they couldn't internally handle these cost increases.  This is our answer.

(B)  Introduces other countries banning Z's imports - the passage says nothing about this. The problem came from Z's own policies, not foreign restrictions.

(C)  Claims they expanded domestically - but we're told they're "export-dependent" and the passage focuses on their export market struggles.

(D)  Mentions labor cost reductions - the passage doesn't discuss any cost-offsetting measures they took.

(E)  Says they moved to previously unprofitable markets - again, no evidence for this in the passage.

The key insight here is recognizing that "sharply limited competitiveness" implies an inability to absorb costs - if they could have maintained their prices despite higher inputs, they would have remained competitive.

---

Want to master the complete framework for handling inference questions like this? You can check out the  step-by-step solution on Neuron by e-GMAT  where you'll discover visualization techniques and the systematic approach to avoid common traps in CR inference questions. You can also explore other GMAT official questions with detailed solutions on Neuron for structured practice  here .

Hope this helps clarify the reasoning! Let me know if you have any questions about this approach.

To protect certain fledgling industries, the government of country Z b

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) Questions

To protect certain fledgling industries, the government of country Z b

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards