Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 00:51 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 00:51
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2   3   4   
655-705 Level|   Comparisons|         
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [1]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [1]
Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel 08 Aug 2020, 19:29
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sislam04
Well you wouldn’t say:
“I am smarter than you”

You would say:
“I am smarter than you are”

The comparison should be the the features of each and not the feature of one person to a person.

Hence why I have trouble with C. It’s conspiring the small car fuel efficiency to the another car. Whereas it should be small car fuel efficient to small car fuel efficeny at any other time.

Hope that makes sense and thank you for your time.
Show more
Hi sislam04,

You may want to change your approach to than, especially when you're looking at an adjective around the than (in this case, taller).

1. I am taller than Jane. ← This is fine.
2. I am taller than Jane is. ← This is also fine.
3. I am taller than Jane is tall. ← This is also fine.
User avatar
sislam04
User avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2016
Last visit: 10 Nov 2022
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
13
 [1]
Given Kudos: 15
Posts: 37
Kudos: 13
 [1]
Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel 08 Aug 2020, 19:35
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AjiteshArun
sislam04
Well you wouldn’t say:
“I am smarter than you”

You would say:
“I am smarter than you are”

The comparison should be the the features of each and not the feature of one person to a person.

Hence why I have trouble with C. It’s conspiring the small car fuel efficiency to the another car. Whereas it should be small car fuel efficient to small car fuel efficeny at any other time.

Hope that makes sense and thank you for your time.
Hi sislam04,

You may want to change your approach to than, especially when you're looking at an adjective around the than (in this case, taller).

1. I am taller than Jane. ← This is fine.
2. I am taller than Jane is. ← This is also fine.
3. I am taller than Jane is tall. ← This is also fine.
Show more

Thank you for your response :)

Perhaps my example wasn’t the best.

I would just like to point out this article:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/e-gmat.com ... r-not/amp/

Jack is less afraid of the dark than his wife.

If we add ‘is’ to the end of this sentence, we have a totally different meaning.

One is compares his fear of the dark to the fear of his wife and the other compares his fear to his wife’s fear.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel 09 Aug 2020, 01:38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sislam04
Thank you for your response :)

Perhaps my example wasn’t the best.

I would just like to point out this article:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/e-gmat.com ... r-not/amp/

Jack is less afraid of the dark than his wife.

If we add ‘is’ to the end of this sentence, we have a totally different meaning.

One is compares his fear of the dark to the fear of his wife and the other compares his fear to his wife’s fear.
Show more
I'm happy to help. :)

I don't agree with the stand taken in that article. I don't think that dropping the is leads to an incorrect sentence, and I'd urge you to look at it the same way: (a) there is some scope for ambiguity in that sentence, but not in the "taller than" sentence and (b) ambiguity is not an absolute error. Here is an example of what I mean.
User avatar
junii
User avatar
Joined: 15 Sep 2018
Last visit: 20 May 2022
Posts: 164
Own Kudos:
126
Given Kudos: 897
Location: Australia
Schools: Alberta University Sauder DeGroote Schulich Jan'22 Intake
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V28
Schools: Alberta University Sauder DeGroote Schulich Jan'22 Intake
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V28
Posts: 164
Kudos: 126
Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel 27 Mar 2021, 06:54
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja please can u help on this question i was unable to eliminate choice a
User avatar
mSKR
User avatar
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Last visit: 10 Mar 2024
Posts: 1,290
Own Kudos:
938
 [1]
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
Schools: IE (A) IIML-IPMX '22 (A) HKUST '22
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
Schools: IE (A) IIML-IPMX '22 (A) HKUST '22
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Posts: 1,290
Kudos: 938
 [1]
Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel 27 Mar 2021, 07:33
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
junii
GMATNinja please can u help on this question i was unable to eliminate choice a
Show more

Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel-efficient now than at any time in their production history.

Meaning: Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel-efficient now than (previous technology allowED manufacturers to make small cars) at any time in their production history.
Key point : small cars are different, fuel efficiency is compared.

If In general, Junni is more efficient now than before.
here, you are same entity . with time you have become more efficient .....(1)same subject
Current Example: Junni is more efficient now than Sunni more efficient before
Ellipsis: more efficient
Concise : Junni is more efficient now than Sunni before --> (2)different subjects

Quote:
(A) small cars more fuel-efficient now than at any time in their
Show more
A is wrong because it treats the same small cars have become more efficient now than these cars were not efficient
This is not intended meaning.
Now you know why? Am i right?

With the same reasoning, you can know more easily the correct answer.

I hope it helps.
User avatar
Hoozan
User avatar
Joined: 28 Sep 2018
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 685
Own Kudos:
701
Given Kudos: 248
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33 (Online)
GMAT 2: 700 Q49 V37
Products:
My Reviews
GMAT 2: 700 Q49 V37
Posts: 685
Kudos: 701
Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel 01 Jun 2021, 00:41
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EducationAisle could you comment on (D)

Quote:
(D) more fuel-efficient small cars than those at any other time in their
Show more

Users have mentioned that the placement of "more" and the usage of "their" is incorrect. Please could you elaborate
User avatar
EducationAisle
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [1]
Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel 01 Jun 2021, 01:40
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hoozan
EducationAisle could you comment on (D)

Quote:
(D) more fuel-efficient small cars than those at any other time in their

Users have mentioned that the placement of "more" and the usage of "their" is incorrect. Please could you elaborate
Show more
Hi Hoozan, the ambiguity associated by the usage of more, is the easiest way to eliminate D.

more fuel-efficient small cars, as used in D could mean either of the following:

i) more (number of) fuel-efficient small cars Or
ii) small cars whose fuel efficiency is more
User avatar
jabhatta2
User avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 1,294
Own Kudos:
317
Given Kudos: 188
Posts: 1,294
Kudos: 317
Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel Updated on: 16 Nov 2022, 14:28
Originally posted by jabhatta2 on 13 Jul 2021, 16:52.
Last edited by jabhatta2 on 16 Nov 2022, 14:28, edited 1 time in total.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EducationAisle - how do you eliminate A ?

I thought "their" in A was referring to manufacturers (how can cars have production history? ). Cars can have maintenance history of themselves, but cars cant have production history ?
User avatar
EducationAisle
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel 13 Jul 2021, 21:37
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jabhatta2
EducationAisle - how do you eliminate A ?
Show more
A says:

Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel-efficient...

This seems to (incorrectly) suggest that whichever small cars currently exist, manufacturers are improvising them to make them more fuel efficient.

It's like this:

I want to make my car less noisy.

Again, this seems to suggest (in this case correctly) that I want to make my "existing" car less noisy.
User avatar
jabhatta2
User avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 1,294
Own Kudos:
317
Given Kudos: 188
Posts: 1,294
Kudos: 317
Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel Updated on: 16 Nov 2022, 14:27
Originally posted by jabhatta2 on 14 Jul 2021, 14:09.
Last edited by jabhatta2 on 16 Nov 2022, 14:27, edited 1 time in total.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EducationAisle
jabhatta2
EducationAisle - how do you eliminate A ?
A says:

Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel-efficient...

This seems to (incorrectly) suggest that whichever small cars currently exist, manufacturers are improvising them to make them more fuel efficient.

It's like this:

I want to make my car less noisy.

Again, this seems to suggest (in this case incorrectly) that I want to make my "existing" car less noisy.
Show more

Hi EducationAisle EducationAisle AjiteshArun RonTargetTestPrep - what in sentence A specifically indicates that sentence A is talking about the "Existing" car (or the old car) being worked on ?

Is the only indication that sentence A is talking about the "old car" because of the usage of "their" or is any other word or phrase in sentence A indicating Sentence A is talking about the "old car" ?

Thank you
User avatar
jabhatta2
User avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 1,294
Own Kudos:
317
Given Kudos: 188
Posts: 1,294
Kudos: 317
Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel 14 Jul 2021, 15:11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi avigutman - I was curious on option A

Why can't their in option A be referring to Manufacturers instead of Cars ? Manufacturers can also have production history.

If the antecedent of their is Manufacturers instead of Cars. Option A say's something completely different now :

Today's technology allows Manufacturers to make small cars more fuel-efficient now than at any time in the Manufacturers' production history

This Option A is comparing two time periods [Now vs manufacturers history] [i.e. this manufacture can presently produce cars that are much more fuel effecient than the manufacturer could in the past]

Thoughts on this interpretation of option A (why maybe wrong) ?
User avatar
avigutman
User avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2019
Last visit: 30 Sep 2025
Posts: 1,293
Own Kudos:
1,930
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Canada
Schools: NYU Stern (WA)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: NYU Stern (WA)
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Posts: 1,293
Kudos: 1,930
Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel 14 Jul 2021, 16:21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jabhatta2
Hi avigutman - I was curious on option A

Why can't their in option A be referring to Manufacturers instead of Cars ? Manufacturers can also have production history.

If the antecedent of their is Manufacturers instead of Cars. Option A say's something completely different now :

Today's technology allows Manufacturers to make small cars more fuel-efficient now than at any time in the Manufacturers' production history

This Option A is comparing two time periods [Now vs manufacturers history] [i.e. this manufacture can presently produce cars that are much more fuel effecient than the manufacturer could in the past]

Thoughts on this interpretation of option A (why maybe wrong) ?
Show more

jabhatta2 I'm with you.
I'd eliminate A for the presence of the word "now" (redundant in the context of "today's tech allows") and the absence of the word "other".
User avatar
ashmit99
User avatar
Joined: 20 Feb 2019
Last visit: 09 Apr 2025
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
38
Given Kudos: 192
Location: India
Schools: Oxford Said'25 (II) LBS '26 (A)
GPA: 3.2
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: Oxford Said'25 (II) LBS '26 (A)
Posts: 91
Kudos: 38
Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel 19 Jul 2021, 00:21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EducationAisle
Hoozan
EducationAisle could you comment on (D)

Quote:
(D) more fuel-efficient small cars than those at any other time in their

Users have mentioned that the placement of "more" and the usage of "their" is incorrect. Please could you elaborate
Hi Hoozan, the ambiguity associated by the usage of more, is the easiest way to eliminate D.

more fuel-efficient small cars, as used in D could mean either of the following:

i) more (number of) fuel-efficient small cars Or
ii) small cars whose fuel efficiency is more
Show more



EducationAisle VeritasKarishma

Don't you think D is not ambiguous. If I consider (i) then it would mean - make more number of fuel-efficient small cars than those(cars) at any other time. So (i) essentially means more number of cars than cars at any other time. I think (i) would make no sense because - more cars than cars - makes no sense. So we are left with (ii), making the option unambiguous.

Thanks in advance!
User avatar
jabhatta2
User avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 1,294
Own Kudos:
317
Given Kudos: 188
Posts: 1,294
Kudos: 317
Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel 21 Jul 2021, 08:28
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi - if I were to fix the two issues mentioned by you in option A in this analogous statement per image beow

Would the comparison be okay ? I think the comparison would be flawed because
-- You are comparing a clause to a prepositional phrase (at any other time )

I dont think the time period (other time) can be compared to Today given Today is an adjective but maybe I am wrong

Thoughts
Attachments

Image.JPG
Image.JPG [ 36.49 KiB | Viewed 3911 times ]

User avatar
jabhatta2
User avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 1,294
Own Kudos:
317
Given Kudos: 188
Posts: 1,294
Kudos: 317
Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel 21 Jul 2021, 09:10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi GMATGuruNY - in another forum per image below, you mentioned the OA shows the following implied comparison

Quote:
Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars [TODAY] that are more fuel-efficient than cars at any other time in production history.
Show more

Is [TODAY] implied in option C because of the expression "Today's technology" ?

Has the expression been instead "Today' Yesterday's technology", option C would be instead

Quote:
Today's Yesterday's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars [TODAY YESTERDAY] that are more fuel-efficient than cars at any other time in production history.
Show more

Please let me know your thoughts
Attachments

image 2.JPG
image 2.JPG [ 83.12 KiB | Viewed 3936 times ]

User avatar
GMATGuruNY
User avatar
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,344
Own Kudos:
3,796
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,344
Kudos: 3,796
 [1]
Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel 22 Jul 2021, 02:44
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jabhatta2
Has the expression been instead "Today' Yesterday's technology", option C would be instead

Quote:
Today's Yesterday's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars [TODAY YESTERDAY] that are more fuel-efficient than cars at any other time in production history.

Please let me know your thoughts
Show more

Yesterday's technology allow manufacturers to make cars that are fuel-efficient.
Here, the blue portion refers to cars being produced IN THE PRESENT.
Since the cars are being produced in the present, the technology used to make these cars cannot be yesterday's technology but must be TODAY'S technology.
As a result, the conveyed meaning is nonsensical.
User avatar
jabhatta2
User avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 1,294
Own Kudos:
317
Given Kudos: 188
Posts: 1,294
Kudos: 317
Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel 14 Oct 2021, 10:11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avigutman
jabhatta2
Hi avigutman - I was curious on option A

Why can't their in option A be referring to Manufacturers instead of Cars ? Manufacturers can also have production history.

If the antecedent of their is Manufacturers instead of Cars. Option A say's something completely different now :

Today's technology allows Manufacturers to make small cars more fuel-efficient now than at any time in the Manufacturers' production history

This Option A is comparing two time periods [Now vs manufacturers history] [i.e. this manufacture can presently produce cars that are much more fuel effecient than the manufacturer could in the past]

Thoughts on this interpretation of option A (why maybe wrong) ?

jabhatta2 I'm with you.
I'd eliminate A for the presence of the word "now" (redundant in the context of "today's tech allows") and the absence of the word "other".
Show more

Hi avigutman – I agree on the red font . QQ on the green font however

Even though I see the word Today in Today’s technology,

I don’t see why its Redudant to compare two time periods (Even in the presence of Today’s technology)

In my analogy, as long as the author compared “today” to "some day in past” – I don’t see why that Now would be redundant per se even in the presence of today’s technology.

I tried getting rid of "NOW" but that would be wrong as seen in my revision below. The comparison then becomes between a clause vs a time marker.
Attachments

1.28 pm.JPG
1.28 pm.JPG [ 38.81 KiB | Viewed 3431 times ]

User avatar
avigutman
User avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2019
Last visit: 30 Sep 2025
Posts: 1,293
Own Kudos:
1,930
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Canada
Schools: NYU Stern (WA)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: NYU Stern (WA)
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Posts: 1,293
Kudos: 1,930
Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel 14 Oct 2021, 11:30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jabhatta2


Even though I see the word Today in Today’s technology,

I don’t see why its Redudant to compare two time periods (Even in the presence of Today’s technology)

In my analogy, as long as the author compared “today” to "some day in past” – I don’t see why that Now would be redundant per se even in the presence of today’s technology.

I tried getting rid of "NOW" but that would be wrong as seen in my revision below. The comparison then becomes between a clause vs a time marker.
Show more

jabhatta2 What do you think about these two options:
1. Today's technology allows me to respond faster now than at any other time in history.
2. Today's technology allows me to respond faster than at any other time in history.
User avatar
jabhatta2
User avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 1,294
Own Kudos:
317
Given Kudos: 188
Posts: 1,294
Kudos: 317
Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel Updated on: 16 Nov 2022, 13:51
Originally posted by jabhatta2 on 14 Oct 2021, 11:48.
Last edited by jabhatta2 on 16 Nov 2022, 13:51, edited 2 times in total.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avigutman
jabhatta2


Even though I see the word Today in Today’s technology,

I don’t see why its Redudant to compare two time periods (Even in the presence of Today’s technology)

In my analogy, as long as the author compared “today” to "some day in past” – I don’t see why that Now would be redundant per se even in the presence of today’s technology.

I tried getting rid of "NOW" but that would be wrong as seen in my revision below. The comparison then becomes between a clause vs a time marker.

jabhatta2 What do you think about these two options:
1. Today's technology allows me to respond faster now than at any other time in history.
2. Today's technology allows me to respond faster now than at any other time in history.
Show more

Hi avigutman -- WAS GOING THROUGH THIS PROBLEM AGAIN AND DIDNT RESPOND.Could you give me your thoughts -

Yes - it doesnt look like i need the "now"

# 2 sounds good to my native ear.

But i dont think # 2 would pass either because of the grammar rules of parallelism

2. Today's technology allows me to respond faster now than at any other time in history.

The Right Hand side (in pink font) is a time marker whereas the Left hand side is now a clause

I think we are FORCED to have "now" vs "any other time" if the comparison has to be apples to apples.
avatar
Naptiste
avatar
Joined: 19 Aug 2020
Last visit: 01 May 2023
Posts: 47
Own Kudos:
3
Given Kudos: 77
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 47
Kudos: 3
Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel 08 Nov 2021, 08:52
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I had another way of approaching this question:

In my opinion there is another way to eliminate both A) and E), as the use of "now" is clearly redundant. Indeed, "Today's technology allows manufacturers to make" does not require a "now" as it is already indicated by "today".

That eliminates A and E, so we are left with B, C, and D.

The other answers are all about parallelism and meaning:

D "those" refer to "small fuel-efficient cars", which does not make sense as we are comparing today's small cars to the past's small cars.

B is very subtile, but B compares the same small cars that changed over time apparently; it does not make sense, "those" is needed to create distance.

What do you guys think ?

I think this is a very hard and interesting question, and the argument for "now", which should not be followed by "any time" as "now" is included in "any time" right also in my opinion.

karthikb
Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel-efficient now than at any time in their production history.

(A) small cars more fuel-efficient now than at any time in their

(B) small cars that are more fuel-efficient than they were at any time in their

(C) small cars that are more fuel-efficient than those at any other time in

(D) more fuel-efficient small cars than those at any other time in their

(E) more fuel-efficient small cars now than at any time in
Show more
   1   2   3   4   
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
miag
188 posts