stonecold wrote:
Taking an Online course at-least gives us the assurance that the verbal content would be fabulous
Hi
stonecold, not sure how much of this is true. An Online course (specifically an
on-demand course) would just ensure that the content would be
uniform. Whether the content is
fabulous, ultimately depends on the
creator of the content (and not on the
medium of instruction).
An online
live session obviously would not even ensure
uniformity.
Quote:
and the teachers would care.
This I am pretty sure is
not true. In fact, even a cursory reading of experiences on this very forum would suggest a deep discontent with the support (the lack of it) provided by many online courses.
Quote:
Plus the cost and the time factor ?
This one is quite
debatable. When one goes to a coaching class, the
setup would
mandate full focus and optimum time-utilization of 3-4 hours of students' time and a strict schedule would be followed. Same might
not happen in an
on-demand course, where the student would have the
luxury to pace the course at his/her own will.
Of course, for a
dedicated and
disciplined student, none of these differences would matter. In any case, all formats of instruction require self-discipline.
p.s. Incidentally, it's interesting that most online companies advertise how an online course is
proven to be more effective than reading (what they call)
monotonous text books. However, I haven't really seen any credible comparisons between
online classes vis-a-vis live
physical classes.