Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 09:44 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 09:44
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
555-605 Level|   Word Problems|                        
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,389
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,389
Kudos: 778,288
 [123]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
118
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 11,238
Own Kudos:
43,703
 [40]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,238
Kudos: 43,703
 [40]
25
Kudos
Add Kudos
15
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
EgmatQuantExpert
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Last visit: 02 Apr 2024
Posts: 3,663
Own Kudos:
20,165
 [25]
Given Kudos: 165
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,663
Kudos: 20,165
 [25]
15
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 6,739
Own Kudos:
35,344
 [5]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,739
Kudos: 35,344
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is the sum of the prices of the 3 books that Shana bought less than $48 ?


(1) The price of the most expensive of the 3 books that Shana bought is less than $17.
(2) The price of the least expensive of the 3 books that Shana bought is exactly $3 less than the price of the second most expensive book.


Target question: Is the sum of the prices of the 3 books less than $48 ?

Let A = price of the LEAST expensive book (in dollars)
Let B = price of the mid-priced expensive book (in dollars)
Let C = price of the MOST expensive book (in dollars)


So, A < B < C

Statement 1: The price of the most expensive of the 3 books that Shana bought is less than $17.
So, C < 17
Let's TEST some values.
There are several cases that satisfy statement 1. Here are two:
Case a: A = $1, B = $2 and C = $3, in which case A + B + C = 1 + 2 + 3 = 6. In this case, the answer to the target question is YES, the sum of the prices IS less than $48
Case b: A = $16.25, B = $16.50 and C = $16.75, in which case A + B + C = 16.25 + 16.50 + 16.75 = 49.50. In this case, the answer to the target question is NO, the sum of the prices is NOT less than $48
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: The price of the least expensive of the 3 books that Shana bought is exactly $3 less than the price of the second most expensive book.
In other words, A = B - 3
Let's TEST some values again.
There are several cases that satisfy statement 1. Here are two:
Case a: A = $1, B = $4 and C = $10, in which case A + B + C = 1 + 4 + 10 = 15. In this case, the answer to the target question is YES, the sum of the prices IS less than $48
Case b: A = $1, B = $4 and C = $100, in which case A + B + C = 1 + 4 + 100 = 105. In this case, the answer to the target question is NO, the sum of the prices is NOT less than $48
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
Statement 1 tells us that C < 17
Statement 2 tells us that A = B - 3
Let's MAXIMIZE ALL of the values
If C < $17, then the greatest possible value of C = $16.99
Since B must be less than C, the greatest possible value of B = $16.98
Since A is $3 less than B, greatest possible value of A = $12.98
So, when we MAXIMIZE all 3 values, A + B + C = $16.99 + $16.98 + $12.98 = $46.95, which is less than $48
If if the GREATEST values of A, B and C have a sum that's less than $48, we can conclude that is must be the case that A + B + C < 48
In other words, the answer to the target question is YES, the sum of the prices IS less than $48
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT

Answer: C

Cheers,
Brent
User avatar
ZoltanBP
Joined: 14 Apr 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 79
Own Kudos:
982
 [3]
Given Kudos: 567
Location: Hungary
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
WE:Education (Education)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
Posts: 79
Kudos: 982
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is the sum of the prices of the 3 books that Shana bought less than $48 ?

(1) The price of the most expensive of the 3 books that Shana bought is less than $17.
(2) The price of the least expensive of the 3 books that Shana bought is exactly $3 less than the price of the second most expensive book.

Let \(x_1, x_2, x_3\) be the prices in increasing order and let \(S\) be the sum of the prices. The original question: Is \(S<$48\) ?

1) Using that \(x_3<17\), we can determine an upper bound for \(S\).

\(S\leq 3x_3<51\)
\(S<$51\)

We can't get a definite answer to the original question. \(\implies\) Insufficient

2) We know that \(x_1=x_2-3\), but no information is given about \(x_3\). Thus, we can't get a definite answer to the original question. \(\implies\) Insufficient

1&2) Using all statement information, we can determine an upper bound for \(S\).

\(S\leq x_3-3+x_3+x_3\)
\(S\leq 3x_3-3<48\)
\(S<$48\)

Thus, the answer to the original question is a definite Yes. \(\implies\) Sufficient

Answer: C
User avatar
MHIKER
Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Last visit: 24 May 2021
Posts: 942
Own Kudos:
5,645
 [1]
Given Kudos: 690
Status:No dream is too large, no dreamer is too small
Concentration: Accounting
Posts: 942
Kudos: 5,645
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is the sum of the prices of the 3 books that Shana bought less than $48 ?


(1) The price of the most expensive of the 3 books that Shana bought is less than $17.
(2) The price of the least expensive of the 3 books that Shana bought is exactly $3 less than the price of the second most expensive book.



NEW question from GMAT® Official Guide 2019


(DS13949)




1) The most expensive is B<17 so the total could 48 or less than 48; Insufficient.

2) The most expensive could be any value so insufficient.

Both:
If the most expensive can be maximum 16, the second-highest price can be 15 then the third on will 12; The maximum price will be 43. Even in case of extreme values such as 16.9, 15.9 and 12.9 the less than \(48\). Sufficient.

Ans C.
User avatar
avigutman
Joined: 17 Jul 2019
Last visit: 30 Sep 2025
Posts: 1,293
Own Kudos:
1,931
 [5]
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Posts: 1,293
Kudos: 1,931
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Video solution from Quant Reasoning:
Subscribe for more: https://www.youtube.com/QuantReasoning? ... irmation=1
User avatar
ScottTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 21,716
Own Kudos:
26,996
 [2]
Given Kudos: 300
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Location: United States (CA)
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 21,716
Kudos: 26,996
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is the sum of the prices of the 3 books that Shana bought less than $48 ?


(1) The price of the most expensive of the 3 books that Shana bought is less than $17.
(2) The price of the least expensive of the 3 books that Shana bought is exactly $3 less than the price of the second most expensive book.



NEW question from GMAT® Official Guide 2019


(DS13949)
Solution:

Question Stem Analysis:


We need to determine whether the total amount spent on the 3 books is less than $48.

Statement One Alone:

Since the most expensive of the 3 books Shana bought is less than $17, the total she has spent is less than 17 x 3 = $51. Since it’s less than $51, it could be less than $48 (e.g., $47), or it could be more than $48 (e.g., $50). Statement one alone is not sufficient.

Statement Two Alone:

Since we don’t know the actual amount spent on any of the 3 books, statement two alone does not allow us to determine whether the total amount spent is less than $48 or not.

Statements One and Two Alone:

With the two statements, let’s assume that the most expensive book is $17 (even though we know it’s less than $17). Let’s also assume the second most expensive book is also $17 and hence the least expensive book is $14. If this is the case, the total amount spent on the 3 books would be exactly 17 + 17 + 14 = $48. However, since we know the prices of the 3 books must be actually less than $17, $17, and $14, respectively, then the total spent is indeed less than $48.

Answer: C
User avatar
GMATinsight
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 6,839
Own Kudos:
16,353
 [1]
Given Kudos: 128
Status:GMAT/GRE Tutor l Admission Consultant l On-Demand Course creator
Location: India
GMAT: QUANT+DI EXPERT
Schools: IIM (A) ISB '24
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V41
WE:Education (Education)
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: IIM (A) ISB '24
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V41
Posts: 6,839
Kudos: 16,353
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is the sum of the prices of the 3 books that Shana bought less than $48 ?


(1) The price of the most expensive of the 3 books that Shana bought is less than $17.
(2) The price of the least expensive of the 3 books that Shana bought is exactly $3 less than the price of the second most expensive book.


Answer: Option C

Video solution by GMATinsight

avatar
ZaidAliShaikh
Joined: 01 Jun 2021
Last visit: 21 Sep 2022
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u
Is the sum of the prices of the 3 books that Shana bought less than $48 ?


(1) The price of the most expensive of the 3 books that Shana bought is less than $17.
The price could be 16.99$, then the price of three books could be between 59 and 51..so NO not <48
If the price is 15$ each, total =45, so yes <48
Insufficient

(2) The price of the least expensive of the 3 books that Shana bought is exactly $3 less than the price of the second most expensive book.
Nothing about the actual cost..
Insufficient..

Combined
Let's see the max possible cost..
Least expensive ~17-13 =~14, slightly less than 14
Let the other two be same so ~17..
So total can be just less than 17+17+14=48..
So just less than 48..
Thus always <48
Sufficient

C


NEW question from GMAT® Official Guide 2019


(DS13949)

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
ag153
Joined: 16 Feb 2017
Last visit: 15 May 2022
Posts: 88
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.69
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How do you know B<C? we just know most expensive book costs a certain amount. WHy can't second most expensive book be same price as most expensive? ScottTargetTestPrep BrentGMATPrepNow KarishmaB


BrentGMATPrepNow
Bunuel
Is the sum of the prices of the 3 books that Shana bought less than $48 ?


(1) The price of the most expensive of the 3 books that Shana bought is less than $17.
(2) The price of the least expensive of the 3 books that Shana bought is exactly $3 less than the price of the second most expensive book.


Target question: Is the sum of the prices of the 3 books less than $48 ?

Let A = price of the LEAST expensive book (in dollars)
Let B = price of the mid-priced expensive book (in dollars)
Let C = price of the MOST expensive book (in dollars)


So, A < B < C

Statement 1: The price of the most expensive of the 3 books that Shana bought is less than $17.
So, C < 17
Let's TEST some values.
There are several cases that satisfy statement 1. Here are two:
Case a: A = $1, B = $2 and C = $3, in which case A + B + C = 1 + 2 + 3 = 6. In this case, the answer to the target question is YES, the sum of the prices IS less than $48
Case b: A = $16.25, B = $16.50 and C = $16.75, in which case A + B + C = 16.25 + 16.50 + 16.75 = 49.50. In this case, the answer to the target question is NO, the sum of the prices is NOT less than $48
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: The price of the least expensive of the 3 books that Shana bought is exactly $3 less than the price of the second most expensive book.
In other words, A = B - 3
Let's TEST some values again.
There are several cases that satisfy statement 1. Here are two:
Case a: A = $1, B = $4 and C = $10, in which case A + B + C = 1 + 4 + 10 = 15. In this case, the answer to the target question is YES, the sum of the prices IS less than $48
Case b: A = $1, B = $4 and C = $100, in which case A + B + C = 1 + 4 + 100 = 105. In this case, the answer to the target question is NO, the sum of the prices is NOT less than $48
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
Statement 1 tells us that C < 17
Statement 2 tells us that A = B - 3
Let's MAXIMIZE ALL of the values
If C < $17, then the greatest possible value of C = $16.99
Since B must be less than C, the greatest possible value of B = $16.98
Since A is $3 less than B, greatest possible value of A = $12.98
So, when we MAXIMIZE all 3 values, A + B + C = $16.99 + $16.98 + $12.98 = $46.95, which is less than $48
If if the GREATEST values of A, B and C have a sum that's less than $48, we can conclude that is must be the case that A + B + C < 48
In other words, the answer to the target question is YES, the sum of the prices IS less than $48
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT

Answer: C

Cheers,
Brent
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 6,739
Own Kudos:
35,344
 [1]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,739
Kudos: 35,344
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ag153
How do you know B<C? we just know most expensive book costs a certain amount. WHy can't second most expensive book be same price as most expensive? ScottTargetTestPrep BrentGMATPrepNow KarishmaB

If the prices of books A, B and C were something like $4, $7, and $7 respectively, I suppose we could still say book C is the most expensive book.
Fortunately, the issue doesn't really come into play for this question.
That is, even if we allow for A ≤ B ≤ C, the correct answer is still C.
avatar
ag153
Joined: 16 Feb 2017
Last visit: 15 May 2022
Posts: 88
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.69
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I know it will not affect but I am trying to understand what would it be if it were testing us on this concept let's say. Why do we assume that they are necessarily lesser than each other? How does gmat treat the case to be?

BrentGMATPrepNow
ag153
How do you know B<C? we just know most expensive book costs a certain amount. WHy can't second most expensive book be same price as most expensive? ScottTargetTestPrep BrentGMATPrepNow KarishmaB

If the prices of books A, B and C were something like $4, $7, and $7 respectively, I suppose we could still say book C is the most expensive book.
Fortunately, the issue doesn't really come into play for this question.
That is, even if we allow for A ≤ B ≤ C, the correct answer is still C.
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 6,739
Own Kudos:
35,344
 [1]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,739
Kudos: 35,344
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ag153
I know it will not affect but I am trying to understand what would it be if it were testing us on this concept let's say. Why do we assume that they are necessarily lesser than each other? How does gmat treat the case to be?

I checked the official solution, and the test makers begin by writing: \(B_1 ≤ B_2 ≤ B_3\).
Later in their solution, when combining both statements, they write the following:


So, it looks like they're allowing for the possibility that \(B_2 = B_3\)
avatar
ag153
Joined: 16 Feb 2017
Last visit: 15 May 2022
Posts: 88
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.69
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Awesome thanks for sharing.
Also how would the “second most expensive” in the statement 2 affect the whole situation? I mean it could be that as per statemtn1 they can all be equated but not as per statement 2 since B2 is “second most expensive” which means it has to be lesser expensive than b3. Pls clarify BrentGMATPrepNow


BrentGMATPrepNow
ag153
I know it will not affect but I am trying to understand what would it be if it were testing us on this concept let's say. Why do we assume that they are necessarily lesser than each other? How does gmat treat the case to be?

I checked the official solution, and the test makers begin by writing: \(B_1 ≤ B_2 ≤ B_3\).
Later in their solution, when combining both statements, they write the following:


So, it looks like they're allowing for the possibility that \(B_2 = B_3\)

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
RenB
Joined: 13 Jul 2022
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 391
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 303
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Nonprofit
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q90 V84 DI82
GPA: 3.74
WE:Corporate Finance (Consulting)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
BrentGMATPrepNow
Bunuel
Is the sum of the prices of the 3 books that Shana bought less than $48 ?


(1) The price of the most expensive of the 3 books that Shana bought is less than $17.
(2) The price of the least expensive of the 3 books that Shana bought is exactly $3 less than the price of the second most expensive book.


Target question: Is the sum of the prices of the 3 books less than $48 ?

Let A = price of the LEAST expensive book (in dollars)
Let B = price of the mid-priced expensive book (in dollars)
Let C = price of the MOST expensive book (in dollars)


So, A < B < C

Statement 1: The price of the most expensive of the 3 books that Shana bought is less than $17.
So, C < 17
Let's TEST some values.
There are several cases that satisfy statement 1. Here are two:
Case a: A = $1, B = $2 and C = $3, in which case A + B + C = 1 + 2 + 3 = 6. In this case, the answer to the target question is YES, the sum of the prices IS less than $48
Case b: A = $16.25, B = $16.50 and C = $16.75, in which case A + B + C = 16.25 + 16.50 + 16.75 = 49.50. In this case, the answer to the target question is NO, the sum of the prices is NOT less than $48
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: The price of the least expensive of the 3 books that Shana bought is exactly $3 less than the price of the second most expensive book.
In other words, A = B - 3
Let's TEST some values again.
There are several cases that satisfy statement 1. Here are two:
Case a: A = $1, B = $4 and C = $10, in which case A + B + C = 1 + 4 + 10 = 15. In this case, the answer to the target question is YES, the sum of the prices IS less than $48
Case b: A = $1, B = $4 and C = $100, in which case A + B + C = 1 + 4 + 100 = 105. In this case, the answer to the target question is NO, the sum of the prices is NOT less than $48
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
Statement 1 tells us that C < 17
Statement 2 tells us that A = B - 3
Let's MAXIMIZE ALL of the values
If C < $17, then the greatest possible value of C = $16.99
Since B must be less than C, the greatest possible value of B = $16.98
Since A is $3 less than B, greatest possible value of A = $12.98
So, when we MAXIMIZE all 3 values, A + B + C = $16.99 + $16.98 + $12.98 = $46.95, which is less than $48
If if the GREATEST values of A, B and C have a sum that's less than $48, we can conclude that is must be the case that A + B + C < 48
In other words, the answer to the target question is YES, the sum of the prices IS less than $48
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT

Answer: C

Cheers,
Brent

Hi,
This solution really helped! Esp the 'maximising' logic in the end.
Btw, I think there is a typo here-
'Since A is $3 less than B, greatest possible value of A = $12.98'
Should be $13.98, thus $47.95
The inferences remain the same though.
User avatar
rushimehta
Joined: 28 Sep 2023
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 47
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 68
Location: India
GPA: 3.78
Posts: 47
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ScottTargetTestPrep

Solution:

Question Stem Analysis:


We need to determine whether the total amount spent on the 3 books is less than $48.

Statement One Alone:

Since the most expensive of the 3 books Shana bought is less than $17, the total she has spent is less than 17 x 3 = $51. Since it’s less than $51, it could be less than $48 (e.g., $47), or it could be more than $48 (e.g., $50). Statement one alone is not sufficient.

Statement Two Alone:

Since we don’t know the actual amount spent on any of the 3 books, statement two alone does not allow us to determine whether the total amount spent is less than $48 or not.

Statements One and Two Alone:

With the two statements, let’s assume that the most expensive book is $17 (even though we know it’s less than $17). Let’s also assume the second most expensive book is also $17 and hence the least expensive book is $14. If this is the case, the total amount spent on the 3 books would be exactly 17 + 17 + 14 = $48. However, since we know the prices of the 3 books must be actually less than $17, $17, and $14, respectively, then the total spent is indeed less than $48.

Answer: C

chetan2u karishma Bunuel

I followed the same approach - one quic query - In cases where the question doesn't explictly mention that the values are different, we can take 2 or more values to be the same right ? As in this case we take the cost of second most expensive book to be the same as the most expensive book.
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 11,238
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,238
Kudos: 43,703
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yes, even if the variables are different say x and y, they can be same. Check them for fractions, negative and positive, zero etc unless specified.
rushimehta


chetan2u karishma Bunuel

I followed the same approach - one quic query - In cases where the question doesn't explictly mention that the values are different, we can take 2 or more values to be the same right ? As in this case we take the cost of second most expensive book to be the same as the most expensive book.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105389 posts
496 posts