blueseas
Hi pghai ,
need some discussion on this.
(B) much of the regional developers' creativity was utilized on the building of the company website and on design and implementation of the back-end server in which it was stored
Correct.
- Parallelism: ... was utilized on X and on Y
- Pronoun: [color=#0000ff]"it" refers to "the company website" correctly.[/color]===>as you said in option E IT is ambiguous...same is the case here....please correct me if i am wrong.
IT can refer to CREATIVITY//WEBSITE //IMPLEMENTATION.
First of all, thanks so much for analyzing my answer (I love discussing

)
As far as I know, the pronoun should refer to the closest eligible antecedent. However, one of the most important note is that
the antecedent & pronoun must make sense together. You can plug in "the creativity" or "implementation" to "it" to test. Does that make sense? I don't think they could be "
stored" in the server. So only "website" makes sense.
blueseas
(E) the creating of the company website accounted for much of the regional developers' creativity as well as design and implementation of the back-end server that stored it
Wrong.
- Change meaning: in this sentence, developers' creativity || design || implement. That is wrong meaning.
- Pronoun ambiguity: "it" is very ambiguous. It refers to what? creativity, implementation or website? We don't know.
my question in this is: whether THE CREATING of ....==>is this is right construction.IMO this is not
regards
I think the structure "the creating of..." itself has no problem (in grammar). The main problem (
IMO) is parallelism.
The structure is: "
X accounted for much of Y as well as Z" means:
X accounted for Y
AND, separately
X accounted for ZSo the creating of the website accounted for design and implementation of the back-end server? No, it does not make sense. That's why I said E changes meaning.
Regards.
Please suggest if i am interpreting wrong.
the creating of.....but i cant frame any sentence having the same structure.
.....in which creating is acting as gerund/noun.