This is a good example for Cause and Effect kind of CR problems. The question states one cause, so the answer usually talks about another cause. Depending on Weaken/Strengthen/Must be true, the cause mentioned in answer validates or invalidates the cause mentioned in the question stem. Based on this, we can answer the above question-
Let's analyze the answer choices:
A) When women and men are exposed to the "same level of hazardous noises" while working, men experience greater loss of hearing.
OUT. Question clearly states that hearing difference happens due to exposure to different levels of noise- "men are usually exposed to more dangerously loud noises." Which means that men are not more prone than women to experience hearing loss given the same conditions.
B) The difference between men and women in their ability to hear higher frequencies is entirely unrelated to any difference in the structure of the inner ear.
KEEP. This answer is talking about another potential cause for hearing loss. It eliminates/invalidates another cause (difference in ear structure) that could lead to hearing difference between men and women. Only if this is true, will the premise in question (men experience greater hearing loss only due to their greater exposure to hazardous noises) hold true. And as we know, premises always have to be true.
C) If male animals were exposed to the same loud noises to which many men are exposed, the animals would experience greater loss of hearing than would female animals.
OUT. This is out of scope. The contention is between male and female humans, and nothing to do with what animals experience.
D) In general, women and men do not differ in their ability to hear lower frequencies.
OUT. Again out of scope. The contention is about higher frequencies. We shouldn't bother about what happens at lower frequencies.
E) Women who live in societies that do not have hazardous noises experience less loss of hearing than do women who live in societies that do have hazardous noises.
OUT. Out of scope. This is comparing one group of women to another group of women. But our contention is about hearing difference between men and women. So even if this statement were true, it doesn't lend anything to the premises in question stem about why men cannot maintain their ability to hear high frequencies when compared to women.
Posted from my mobile devicePosted from my mobile device