Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
ashikaverma13
GMAT 1: 640 Q47 V31
Posts: 123
25 Dec 2017, 10:39
Kudos
Bookmarks
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
75%
(hard)
Question Stats:
55% (02:09) correct
45%
(02:13)
wrong
based on 1207
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The Care Hospital attracts a high number of patients with mental illness who need special care. The doctors at the hospital, however, cannot provide enough time for every patient unless the doctor staff is increased by more than twenty percent. Drastically increasing the doctor staff is not a practical solution, given that the city has dearth of medical professionals. Another alternative is to train the nurses on many of the tasks that previously only the doctor undertook. This approach will however, not completely solve the problem. It is thus clear that the high quality of care the hospital currently provides may not be maintained for a long time.
Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the passage?
A. The quality of service provided by the Care Hospital will certainly decline over the next few months.
B. The training program for nurses will have to be comprehensive so the nurses can undertake all the tasks that only doctors undertook previously.
C. If recruiting doctors from other hospitals as visiting doctors were possible, it could potentially help the hospital maintain its high quality of care.
D. The declining quality of care at the hospital will reduce its patient intake which will solve the problem on its own.
E. Allowing doctors to spend less time per patient will help the hospital maintain the quality of care.
Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the passage?
A. The quality of service provided by the Care Hospital will certainly decline over the next few months.
B. The training program for nurses will have to be comprehensive so the nurses can undertake all the tasks that only doctors undertook previously.
C. If recruiting doctors from other hospitals as visiting doctors were possible, it could potentially help the hospital maintain its high quality of care.
D. The declining quality of care at the hospital will reduce its patient intake which will solve the problem on its own.
E. Allowing doctors to spend less time per patient will help the hospital maintain the quality of care.
I am not sure why the answer is what it is. For inference questions, it is required that one operates within the parameters of what has been provided within the sentence and the answer seems to suggesting something completely new.
Kindly support your answer with explanations!
Thanks
Kindly support your answer with explanations!
Thanks
26 Dec 2017, 02:24
Kudos
Bookmarks
The answer is C.
A. The quality of service provided by the Care Hospital will certainly decline over the next few months.
This is hard to infer. The relative passage is: "It is thus clear that the high quality of care the hospital currently provides may not be maintained for a long time". This suggests that the quality of care is not sustainable in the long-term, but "certainly decline over the next few months" suggest a decline in the quality in the short-term.
B. The training program for nurses will have to be comprehensive so the nurses can undertake all the tasks that only doctors undertook previously.
This is again incorrect. The relative passage is: "Another alternative is to train the nurses on many of the tasks that previously only the doctor undertook". Nothing in this passage suggests that the tasks doctors previously undertook requires comprehensive training. All we know is that there are tasks that only doctors previously conducted - this could be something as simple as applying a band-aid to conducting brain-surgery. Hard to comment on the rigour of training required.
C. If recruiting doctors from other hospitals as visiting doctors were possible, it could potentially help the hospital maintain its high quality of care.
This is the correct answer. The relative passages are:
"The doctors at the hospital, however, cannot provide enough time for every patient unless the doctor staff is increased by more than twenty percent. " and
"Drastically increasing the doctor staff is not a practical solution, given that the city has dearth of medical professionals. Another alternative is to train the nurses on many of the tasks that previously only the doctor undertook. This approach will however, not completely solve the problem".
Clearly the problem is two-fold: firstly, lack of local doctors to recruit as well as a lack of employed doctors at the hospital, and secondly, even if nurses are re-trained, this doesn't completely solve the problem. This answer suggests if they hire visiting doctors - it could potentially solve the problem. This is logical conclusion, because the problem is clearly a lack of doctors in the hospital.
D. The declining quality of care at the hospital will reduce its patient intake which will solve the problem on its own.
This is hard to infer. The underlying assumption would be that once the quality of care declines, hospitals will turn away patients. Why would that be the case? If the hospital is reputable for excellent service, with a 9.8/10 average rating, and that declines to 8/10, 7/10 ... at which point would the hospital turn away patients? We also do not know how much the service is expected to decline. All we know is that the quality is expected to decline - this does not necessarily mean the capacity of patients is at full.
E. Allowing doctors to spend less time per patient will help the hospital maintain the quality of care.
This doesn't make sense. The question implies in the first and last sentence that a lack of time spent with patients leads to a lack of quality. This answer suggests otherwise.
Hope that makes sense.
A. The quality of service provided by the Care Hospital will certainly decline over the next few months.
This is hard to infer. The relative passage is: "It is thus clear that the high quality of care the hospital currently provides may not be maintained for a long time". This suggests that the quality of care is not sustainable in the long-term, but "certainly decline over the next few months" suggest a decline in the quality in the short-term.
B. The training program for nurses will have to be comprehensive so the nurses can undertake all the tasks that only doctors undertook previously.
This is again incorrect. The relative passage is: "Another alternative is to train the nurses on many of the tasks that previously only the doctor undertook". Nothing in this passage suggests that the tasks doctors previously undertook requires comprehensive training. All we know is that there are tasks that only doctors previously conducted - this could be something as simple as applying a band-aid to conducting brain-surgery. Hard to comment on the rigour of training required.
C. If recruiting doctors from other hospitals as visiting doctors were possible, it could potentially help the hospital maintain its high quality of care.
This is the correct answer. The relative passages are:
"The doctors at the hospital, however, cannot provide enough time for every patient unless the doctor staff is increased by more than twenty percent. " and
"Drastically increasing the doctor staff is not a practical solution, given that the city has dearth of medical professionals. Another alternative is to train the nurses on many of the tasks that previously only the doctor undertook. This approach will however, not completely solve the problem".
Clearly the problem is two-fold: firstly, lack of local doctors to recruit as well as a lack of employed doctors at the hospital, and secondly, even if nurses are re-trained, this doesn't completely solve the problem. This answer suggests if they hire visiting doctors - it could potentially solve the problem. This is logical conclusion, because the problem is clearly a lack of doctors in the hospital.
D. The declining quality of care at the hospital will reduce its patient intake which will solve the problem on its own.
This is hard to infer. The underlying assumption would be that once the quality of care declines, hospitals will turn away patients. Why would that be the case? If the hospital is reputable for excellent service, with a 9.8/10 average rating, and that declines to 8/10, 7/10 ... at which point would the hospital turn away patients? We also do not know how much the service is expected to decline. All we know is that the quality is expected to decline - this does not necessarily mean the capacity of patients is at full.
E. Allowing doctors to spend less time per patient will help the hospital maintain the quality of care.
This doesn't make sense. The question implies in the first and last sentence that a lack of time spent with patients leads to a lack of quality. This answer suggests otherwise.
Hope that makes sense.
26 Dec 2017, 13:48
Kudos
Bookmarks
[quote="ashikaverma13"]The Care Hospital attracts a high number of patients with mental illness who need special care. The doctors at the hospital, however, cannot provide enough time for every patient unless the doctor staff is increased by more than twenty percent. Drastically increasing the doctor staff is not a practical solution, given that the city has dearth of medical professionals. Another alternative is to train the nurses on many of the tasks that previously only the doctor undertook. This approach will however, not completely solve the problem. It is thus clear that the high quality of care the hospital currently provides may not be maintained for a long time.
Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the passage?
Lets Try to eliminate the wrong nswers
A. The quality of service provided by the Care Hospital will certainly decline over the next few months. -Incorrect
We don't know whether the quality will CERTAINLY decline or not. We have information that it May Not be maintained. Even if it does, "Next Few Months" is very specific. Why not 4 months/1 year or 4 years
B. The training program for nurses will have to be comprehensive so the nurses can undertake all the tasks that only doctors undertook previously. - Incorrect
We dont know the current knowledge gap between the doctors and the nurses. It may be possible that the nurses are almost equally competent and just need some basic training
C. If recruiting doctors from other hospitals as visiting doctors were possible, it could potentially help the hospital maintain its high quality of care. - Looks Good
Not an extreme statement.
D. The declining quality of care at the hospital will reduce its patient intake which will solve the problem on its own.-Incorrect
May not be true. Maybe it is the only hospital in the city. Even after the degraded quality of care it is still way better than the other hospitals
E. Allowing doctors to spend less time per patient will help the hospital maintain the quality of care. --- Incorrect
How much less is enough? we don't know that.
Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the passage?
Lets Try to eliminate the wrong nswers
A. The quality of service provided by the Care Hospital will certainly decline over the next few months. -Incorrect
We don't know whether the quality will CERTAINLY decline or not. We have information that it May Not be maintained. Even if it does, "Next Few Months" is very specific. Why not 4 months/1 year or 4 years
B. The training program for nurses will have to be comprehensive so the nurses can undertake all the tasks that only doctors undertook previously. - Incorrect
We dont know the current knowledge gap between the doctors and the nurses. It may be possible that the nurses are almost equally competent and just need some basic training
C. If recruiting doctors from other hospitals as visiting doctors were possible, it could potentially help the hospital maintain its high quality of care. - Looks Good
Not an extreme statement.
D. The declining quality of care at the hospital will reduce its patient intake which will solve the problem on its own.-Incorrect
May not be true. Maybe it is the only hospital in the city. Even after the degraded quality of care it is still way better than the other hospitals
E. Allowing doctors to spend less time per patient will help the hospital maintain the quality of care. --- Incorrect
How much less is enough? we don't know that.
