The format of network television news programs generally allows advocates of a point of view only 30 seconds to convey their message. Consequently, regular watchers become accustomed to thinking of issues in terms only of slogans and catch phrases, and so the expectation of careful discussion of public issues gradually disappears from their awareness. The format of newspaper stories, on the other hand, leads readers to pursue details of stories headed by the most important facts and so has the opposite effect on regular readers—that of maintaining the expectation of careful discussion of public issues. Therefore, in contrast to regular newspaper reading, regular watching of network television news programs increases the tendency to think of public issues in oversimplified terms.
The argument assumes which one of the following?
(A) Viewers of network television news programs would be interested in seeing advocates of opposing views present their positions at length.
(B) Since it is not possible to present striking images that would symbolize events for viewers, and since images hold sway over words in television, television must oversimplify.
(C) It is not possible for television to present public issues in a way that allows for the nuanced presentation of diverse views and a good‑faith interchange between advocates
of opposing views.
(D) In network television news reports, it is not usual for a reporter to offer additional factual evidence and background information to develop a story in which opposing views are presented briefly by their advocates.
(E) Television news reporters introduce more of their own biases into news stories than do newspaper reporters.
negating the main point:
watching tv news regularly than news paper will not increase the tendency to think in oversimplified terms
or in other words
watching tv news regularly than news paper will not give half baked-info to viewers/ give full info abt issue
given that a) half-baked discussion happens in tv b)news paper gives detail info -> careful discussion
pre-think :
1.what if the tv news give enough info in 30sec that view will understand the whole story
2. what if multiple opposing/supporting discussion happening in 30secs gives all info details
look at the options:
(A) Viewers of network television news programs would be interested in seeing advocates of opposing views present their positions at length.
even if viewers are interested in seeing advocates , it doesnot imply it viewer will get all info. hence not correct
(B) Since it is not possible to present striking images that would symbolize events for viewers, and since images hold sway over words in television, television must oversimplify.
this is exactly mentioned in the passage. tv news are not effective since it gives half bake info. hence incorrect.
(C) It is not possible for television to present public issues in a way that allows for the nuanced presentation of diverse views and a good‑faith interchange between advocates
of opposing views.
even if it is possible to present diverse views and good faith interchange, it doesnot imply full info is presented.
it is not touching the main point. hence incorrect
(D) In network television news reports, it is not usual for a reporter to offer additional factual evidence and background information to develop a story in which opposing views are presented briefly by their advocates.
if usually , reporter offers additional facts -> leading to story, then views can understand the issue completely.
this is touching the main point. hence correct.
(E) Television news reporters introduce more of their own biases into news stories than do newspaper reporters.
even if tv news dont include own bias than news paper, it doesnot imply reader will get full knowedge of issue. hence
not touching the main point. hence incorrect