Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
19 Aug 2019, 20:19
Kudos
Bookmarks
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
25%
(medium)
Question Stats:
69% (01:24) correct
31%
(01:25)
wrong
based on 1125
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
His inexperienced and poorly equipped army of civilian soldiers, even with it, General Washington leading an effective war against British forces in America, defeating one of the most powerful nations on the earth.
A. His inexperienced and poorly equipped army of civilian soldiers, even with it, General Washington leading
B. With his army of civilian soldiers, inexperienced and poorly equipped, General Washington led
C. Despite being inexperienced and poorly equipped, General Washington’s army of civilian soldiers led
D. General Washington led his inexperienced and poorly equipped army of civilian soldiers into
E. Despite his inexperienced and poorly equipped army of civilian soldiers, General Washington led
Message from generis : we are lucky to have a guest poster today! I posted SC #1.
This question, posted by bebs , is SC #2.
This question, posted by bebs , is SC #2.
19 Aug 2019, 21:22
Kudos
Bookmarks
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION
MEANING ANALYSIS
• His inexperienced and poorly equipped army of civilian soldiers
-- even with it,
-- General Washington leading an effective war against British forces in America, defeating one of the most powerful nations on the earth.
Because there are major structural issues with this sentence, the meaning is not absolutely clear.
As far as we can discern at the moment,
1) General Washington's [GW] army was inexperienced and ill-equipped
2) GW fought an effective war against the British
3) "even with it" probably refers to the army of civilian soldiers but its placement and phrasing are bizarre.
Contrast already exists because his army is in bad shape. They are civilians. They are taking on a powerful nation.
Although contrast inherently exists in the content, making that "contrary to expectation" aspect very clear is wise: GW led a ragtag army, and he and they defeated a superpower .
This "even with it" phrase is trying to make that contrast explicit.
ERROR ANALYSIS
• There is no verb for the subject General Washington
• The phrase His inexperienced . . . is not connected properly to the rest of the sentence, leading to unclear meaning.
ANSWER CHOICES
A. His inexperienced and poorly equipped army of civilian soldiers, even with it, General Washington leading
• option A contains the same errors as those discussed in the analysis section
ELIMINATE
B. With his army of civilian soldiers, inexperienced and poorly equipped, General Washington led
• Possible meaning error: "with" does not really express contrast.
• we know only that GW, along with his raggedy troops, led an effective war.
• We will keep looking to see whether a better option exists, one that contains both clarity and explicit contrast
KEEP
C. Despite being inexperienced and poorly equipped, General Washington’s army of civilian soldiers led
• This choice presents contrast but is illogical. Why mention General Washington unless he is . . . well, the person who led the attack?
• the army did not lead the attack on the British. The general led the attack.
D. General Washington led his inexperienced and poorly equipped army of civilian soldiers into
• possible meaning error: same as that in B.
KEEP
E. Despite his inexperienced and poorly equipped army of civilian soldiers, General Washington led
• This choice seems clear, grammatical, and logical
• Despite is a preposition that must be followed by a noun or noun phrase
• Despite conveys this meaning: even though GW and his soldiers faced difficulties, they were unaffected by those difficulties—they still won the war.
-- Correct: Despite having spent 27 years in solitary confinement for leading the protest against South African racial apartheid, Nelson Mandela did not emerge as a bitter or cynical man. (Even though Mandela was imprisoned and alone for 27 years, his character was unaffected by the brutal and lengthy punishment.)
Compare B and E
-- option B uses essentially the same words as those in E except that with replaces despite
-- option B makes it sound matter-of-fact that GW and his raggedy troops won a war against a powerful nation.
With = together with a raggedy band of civilians, GW led . . . .
Option E is better.
-- B states the facts but does not emphasize the contrast.
-- Logically and stylistically it makes more sense to emphasize the stark contrast.
That last fact becomes even more evident when we see D.
-- D is grammatical.
-- D also lacks the dynamism and contrast present in option E. Option D does not use "despite."
The sentence drones.
Strategic part to keep in mind: two of the three remaining options do not emphasize contrast.
One of three does emphasize contrast.
The difference between B and D is not significant. D is the better sentence, but not by much.
Make a decision. As a matter of strategy, the one option that is different from the other two nearly indistinguishable option must be the answer.
Alternatively, decide that it makes more sense to emphasize stark contrast than not to do so. (Compare D and E. D is too matter-of-fact.)
The correct answer is E.
COMMENTS
sharathnair14 , welcome to Butler.
Some of these answers are very well-explained.
I am happy for the people who will read this thread.
I am grateful to our guest. He did me a favor. (These questions are hella hard to find, folks.)
I demonstrated that I appreciated his efforts.
Perhaps you could do the same. He posted the question. At the top. First post.
bebs , thank you for providing a good question with which people can see that three grammatical sentences are not all equal.
Kudos to those who posted explanations.
bebs
I am writing this official explanation as closely to the original as I feel comfortable doing.
MEANING ANALYSIS
• His inexperienced and poorly equipped army of civilian soldiers
-- even with it,
-- General Washington leading an effective war against British forces in America, defeating one of the most powerful nations on the earth.
Because there are major structural issues with this sentence, the meaning is not absolutely clear.
As far as we can discern at the moment,
1) General Washington's [GW] army was inexperienced and ill-equipped
2) GW fought an effective war against the British
3) "even with it" probably refers to the army of civilian soldiers but its placement and phrasing are bizarre.
Contrast already exists because his army is in bad shape. They are civilians. They are taking on a powerful nation.
Although contrast inherently exists in the content, making that "contrary to expectation" aspect very clear is wise: GW led a ragtag army, and he and they defeated a superpower .
This "even with it" phrase is trying to make that contrast explicit.
ERROR ANALYSIS
• There is no verb for the subject General Washington
• The phrase His inexperienced . . . is not connected properly to the rest of the sentence, leading to unclear meaning.
ANSWER CHOICES
A. His inexperienced and poorly equipped army of civilian soldiers, even with it, General Washington leading
• option A contains the same errors as those discussed in the analysis section
ELIMINATE
B. With his army of civilian soldiers, inexperienced and poorly equipped, General Washington led
• Possible meaning error: "with" does not really express contrast.
• we know only that GW, along with his raggedy troops, led an effective war.
• We will keep looking to see whether a better option exists, one that contains both clarity and explicit contrast
KEEP
C. Despite being inexperienced and poorly equipped, General Washington’s army of civilian soldiers led
• This choice presents contrast but is illogical. Why mention General Washington unless he is . . . well, the person who led the attack?
• the army did not lead the attack on the British. The general led the attack.
D. General Washington led his inexperienced and poorly equipped army of civilian soldiers into
• possible meaning error: same as that in B.
KEEP
E. Despite his inexperienced and poorly equipped army of civilian soldiers, General Washington led
• This choice seems clear, grammatical, and logical
• Despite is a preposition that must be followed by a noun or noun phrase
• Despite conveys this meaning: even though GW and his soldiers faced difficulties, they were unaffected by those difficulties—they still won the war.
-- Correct: Despite having spent 27 years in solitary confinement for leading the protest against South African racial apartheid, Nelson Mandela did not emerge as a bitter or cynical man. (Even though Mandela was imprisoned and alone for 27 years, his character was unaffected by the brutal and lengthy punishment.)
Compare B and E
-- option B uses essentially the same words as those in E except that with replaces despite
-- option B makes it sound matter-of-fact that GW and his raggedy troops won a war against a powerful nation.
With = together with a raggedy band of civilians, GW led . . . .
Option E is better.
-- B states the facts but does not emphasize the contrast.
-- Logically and stylistically it makes more sense to emphasize the stark contrast.
That last fact becomes even more evident when we see D.
-- D is grammatical.
-- D also lacks the dynamism and contrast present in option E. Option D does not use "despite."
The sentence drones.
Strategic part to keep in mind: two of the three remaining options do not emphasize contrast.
One of three does emphasize contrast.
The difference between B and D is not significant. D is the better sentence, but not by much.
Make a decision. As a matter of strategy, the one option that is different from the other two nearly indistinguishable option must be the answer.
Alternatively, decide that it makes more sense to emphasize stark contrast than not to do so. (Compare D and E. D is too matter-of-fact.)
The correct answer is E.
COMMENTS
sharathnair14 , welcome to Butler.
Some of these answers are very well-explained.
I am happy for the people who will read this thread.
I am grateful to our guest. He did me a favor. (These questions are hella hard to find, folks.)
I demonstrated that I appreciated his efforts.
Perhaps you could do the same. He posted the question. At the top. First post.
bebs , thank you for providing a good question with which people can see that three grammatical sentences are not all equal.
Kudos to those who posted explanations.
General Discussion
19 Aug 2019, 21:44
Kudos
Bookmarks
A - even with it - what is the antecedent of it - incorrect + looks awkward
B - not sure what inexperienced and poorly equipped modifiers - army or Washington?
C - army didn’t led ! Washington did
D - into effective war - incorrect
E - correct
IMO E
Posted from my mobile device
B - not sure what inexperienced and poorly equipped modifiers - army or Washington?
C - army didn’t led ! Washington did
D - into effective war - incorrect
E - correct
IMO E
Posted from my mobile device
