Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 03:46 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 03:46
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sim_SG3
Joined: 18 Sep 2023
Last visit: 01 Feb 2024
Posts: 237
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 237
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Sustainability
Schools: NUS '27
GPA: 3.49
WE:Operations (Finance)
Schools: NUS '27
Posts: 237
Kudos: 185
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mcelroytutoring
Joined: 10 Jul 2015
Last visit: 19 Mar 2026
Posts: 1,206
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 282
Status:Expert GMAT, GRE, and LSAT Tutor / Coach
Affiliations: Harvard University, A.B. with honors in Government, 2002
Location: United States (CO)
Age: 45 (10 years and counting on GMAT Club!)
GMAT 1: 770 Q47 V48
GMAT 2: 730 Q44 V47
GMAT 3: 750 Q50 V42
GMAT 4: 730 Q48 V42 (Online)
GRE 1: Q168 V169
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 4: 730 Q48 V42 (Online)
GRE 1: Q168 V169
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 1,206
Kudos: 2,675
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sim_SG3
Joined: 18 Sep 2023
Last visit: 01 Feb 2024
Posts: 237
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 237
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Sustainability
Schools: NUS '27
GPA: 3.49
WE:Operations (Finance)
Schools: NUS '27
Posts: 237
Kudos: 185
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 6,074
Own Kudos:
5,137
 [2]
Given Kudos: 743
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 6,074
Kudos: 5,137
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sim_SG3
This might be a weird question with questionable logic at best. Possibly one that has no place on this sub-forum, but...

If I'm not wrong, a small score increase in Verbal really boosts your score in the Classic GMAT when compared to a similar score jump in Quant. Basically, a +1 in Verbal contributes more to an increase in overall score than a +1 in Quant. I always assumed this was due to fewer people scoring high in Verbal and the sectional percentiles contributing to the overall score.
Pre-Emptive Question: Am I wrong here?

Actual Question: Do you think this would apply to the Focus Edition as well?

I feel like the idea is kind of supplemented by the score-to-percentile mapping predictions folks have been releasing lately, but I could be totally wrong. To top it off, we have a whole new variable with the introduction of Data Insights and we are yet to understand how these three sections work together to make up the overall score.

But this is a question that keeps me up at night and there's no better forum to ask on than here.
Hi Sim_SG3,

1. I'm not too sure about this, but you could try analysing some of the scoring grid data out there. Just keep in mind that (a) the data you see may not be 100% accurate and (b) quant and verbal are weighted equally (this is definitely true).

2. GMAC has already stated that all three sections (DI, quant, verbal) are weighted equally.
Quote:
Your GMAT™ Exam - Focus Edition Total Score is based on your performance on all 3 sections of the exam, with each section weighted equally.
Beyond that, it's hard to say just how the scores combine.

3. I think timing in verbal could be a problem for some test takers. The small increase in average time isn't enough to offset the impact of removing SC. We'll see how this plays out, but I'm letting my students know that they should work extra hard on time management.

Again, it's hard to say how this will affect test takers, but I don't think GMAC should have cut the number of breaks.
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 43,142
Own Kudos:
83,678
 [1]
Given Kudos: 24,657
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 43,142
Kudos: 83,678
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I have observed the effect you are referring to on the Classic GMAT. I’m not sure that I can immediately provide a scientific proof of that effect but I believe I’ve noticed that relationship on the number of scores…

For GMAT focus, the situation is Different. There is a very clear relationship between section score and the total score. On the GMAT focus, there’s no discrimination and it’s a very linear relationship. 1 extra point on quant or verbal or data insights section will give you the same exact contribution to the final score. I have ran regressions and it’s a very straightforward formula with great precision.

So with Focus, if you have room to improve in one of the sections and it’s easier to improve than another section, you want to maximize the section you can improve with least effort.

However this logic only goes so far because getting additional points on each section gets progressively harder… if you look at the percentile curves, the expectation is that very few people will be getting very high quantitative scores compared to the current situation… we will see about that of course but if you can push your quant and data insights to the limit, you can sort of slide on the verbal portion of the test. And my expectation is that similar to the gym at classic, business schools will mostly care about the overall score and not so much your split.



Sim_SG3
This might be a weird question with questionable logic at best. Possibly one that has no place on this sub-forum, but...

If I'm not wrong, a small score increase in Verbal really boosts your score in the Classic GMAT when compared to a similar score jump in Quant. Basically, a +1 in Verbal contributes more to an increase in overall score than a +1 in Quant. I always assumed this was due to fewer people scoring high in Verbal and the sectional percentiles contributing to the overall score.
Pre-Emptive Question: Am I wrong here?

Actual Question: Do you think this would apply to the Focus Edition as well?

I feel like the idea is kind of supplemented by the score-to-percentile mapping predictions folks have been releasing lately, but I could be totally wrong. To top it off, we have a whole new variable with the introduction of Data Insights and we are yet to understand how these three sections work together to make up the overall score.

But this is a question that keeps me up at night and there's no better forum to ask on than here.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Sim_SG3
Joined: 18 Sep 2023
Last visit: 01 Feb 2024
Posts: 237
Own Kudos:
185
 [1]
Given Kudos: 237
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Sustainability
Schools: NUS '27
GPA: 3.49
WE:Operations (Finance)
Schools: NUS '27
Posts: 237
Kudos: 185
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi AjiteshArun,

Thank you so much for your response!

I did hear about GMAC trying to give each section equal importance, but I must have missed the note on these sections actually being weighted equally.

The point about the removal of SC making time on the Verbal section tight is definitely concerning. Especially for those of us who are better at SC than CR and RC. I also agree on the break removal bit, I would have really appreciated the gap between each section to properly disconnect from the previous section and get a sip of water in before heading back to war.

Thank you for sharing your insights, they're very helpful and have given me a lot to think about!

Best,
Sim

AjiteshArun
Sim_SG3
This might be a weird question with questionable logic at best. Possibly one that has no place on this sub-forum, but...

If I'm not wrong, a small score increase in Verbal really boosts your score in the Classic GMAT when compared to a similar score jump in Quant. Basically, a +1 in Verbal contributes more to an increase in overall score than a +1 in Quant. I always assumed this was due to fewer people scoring high in Verbal and the sectional percentiles contributing to the overall score.
Pre-Emptive Question: Am I wrong here?

Actual Question: Do you think this would apply to the Focus Edition as well?

I feel like the idea is kind of supplemented by the score-to-percentile mapping predictions folks have been releasing lately, but I could be totally wrong. To top it off, we have a whole new variable with the introduction of Data Insights and we are yet to understand how these three sections work together to make up the overall score.

But this is a question that keeps me up at night and there's no better forum to ask on than here.
Hi Sim_SG3,

1. I'm not too sure about this, but you could try analysing some of the scoring grid data out there. Just keep in mind that (a) the data you see may not be 100% accurate and (b) quant and verbal are weighted equally (this is definitely true).

2. GMAC has already stated that all three sections (DI, quant, verbal) are weighted equally.
Quote:
Your GMAT™ Exam - Focus Edition Total Score is based on your performance on all 3 sections of the exam, with each section weighted equally.
Beyond that, it's hard to say just how the scores combine.

3. I think timing in verbal could be a problem for some test takers. The small increase in average time isn't enough to offset the impact of removing SC. We'll see how this plays out, but I'm letting my students know that they should work extra hard on time management.

Again, it's hard to say how this will affect test takers, but I don't think GMAC should have cut the number of breaks.
User avatar
Sim_SG3
Joined: 18 Sep 2023
Last visit: 01 Feb 2024
Posts: 237
Own Kudos:
185
 [1]
Given Kudos: 237
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Sustainability
Schools: NUS '27
GPA: 3.49
WE:Operations (Finance)
Schools: NUS '27
Posts: 237
Kudos: 185
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi bb,

Thank you for putting an end to my misery!

In a way, I think it's better that each section is getting equal weightage. But the fact that scoring in each section gets progressively harder is definitely a sore spot. I'd like to believe being well-rounded across all three sections is the safest way forward. But still happy to hear that schools are likely more interested in overall scores as opposed to sectional ones!

Looking forward to the feedback test takers give after the 7th of the month.

Thanks again for proving I'm not hallucinating the Classic GMAT's differential section weightage and for taking the time to give such a detailed response to my questions!

Best,
Sim

bb
I have observed the effect you are referring to on the Classic GMAT. I’m not sure that I can immediately provide a scientific proof of that effect but I believe I’ve noticed that relationship on the number of scores…

For GMAT focus, the situation is Different. There is a very clear relationship between section score and the total score. On the GMAT focus, there’s no discrimination and it’s a very linear relationship. 1 extra point on quant or verbal or data insights section will give you the same exact contribution to the final score. I have ran regressions and it’s a very straightforward formula with great precision.

So with Focus, if you have room to improve in one of the sections and it’s easier to improve than another section, you want to maximize the section you can improve with least effort.

However this logic only goes so far because getting additional points on each section gets progressively harder… if you look at the percentile curves, the expectation is that very few people will be getting very high quantitative scores compared to the current situation… we will see about that of course but if you can push your quant and data insights to the limit, you can sort of slide on the verbal portion of the test. And my expectation is that similar to the gym at classic, business schools will mostly care about the overall score and not so much your split.



Sim_SG3
This might be a weird question with questionable logic at best. Possibly one that has no place on this sub-forum, but...

If I'm not wrong, a small score increase in Verbal really boosts your score in the Classic GMAT when compared to a similar score jump in Quant. Basically, a +1 in Verbal contributes more to an increase in overall score than a +1 in Quant. I always assumed this was due to fewer people scoring high in Verbal and the sectional percentiles contributing to the overall score.
Pre-Emptive Question: Am I wrong here?

Actual Question: Do you think this would apply to the Focus Edition as well?

I feel like the idea is kind of supplemented by the score-to-percentile mapping predictions folks have been releasing lately, but I could be totally wrong. To top it off, we have a whole new variable with the introduction of Data Insights and we are yet to understand how these three sections work together to make up the overall score.

But this is a question that keeps me up at night and there's no better forum to ask on than here.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
mcelroytutoring
Joined: 10 Jul 2015
Last visit: 19 Mar 2026
Posts: 1,206
Own Kudos:
2,675
 [1]
Given Kudos: 282
Status:Expert GMAT, GRE, and LSAT Tutor / Coach
Affiliations: Harvard University, A.B. with honors in Government, 2002
Location: United States (CO)
Age: 45 (10 years and counting on GMAT Club!)
GMAT 1: 770 Q47 V48
GMAT 2: 730 Q44 V47
GMAT 3: 750 Q50 V42
GMAT 4: 730 Q48 V42 (Online)
GRE 1: Q168 V169
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 4: 730 Q48 V42 (Online)
GRE 1: Q168 V169
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 1,206
Kudos: 2,675
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I don't believe that when GMAC / ACT created the classic GMAT, the team got together and said "let's make an exam that rewards high Verbal scores more than high Quant scores."

So, why does this appear to be true, even though GMAC has clearly stated that Verbal and Quant performances are weighted equally?

Well, very high GMAT scores in either section have a strong effect on the composite score conversion. And because scores of V45+ (99%) are far more rare than perfect Q51s (97%), these highest Verbal scores are disproportionately rewarded in the composite conversion.

I expect this phenomenon to hold true on the GMAT Focus Edition as well—though the effect will be somewhat blunted by the inclusion of the Data Insights score in the composite conversion.
User avatar
Sim_SG3
Joined: 18 Sep 2023
Last visit: 01 Feb 2024
Posts: 237
Own Kudos:
185
 [1]
Given Kudos: 237
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Sustainability
Schools: NUS '27
GPA: 3.49
WE:Operations (Finance)
Schools: NUS '27
Posts: 237
Kudos: 185
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mcelroytutoring
I don't believe that when GMAC / ACT created the classic GMAT, the team got together and said "let's make an exam that rewards high Verbal scores more than high Quant scores."

So, why does this appear to be true, even though Verbal and Quant performances are most likely weighted equally? Well, very high GMAT scores in either section have a strong effect on the composite score conversion. And because scores of V45+ (99%) are actually far more rare than perfect Q51s (97%), these highest Verbal scores are disproportionately rewarded in the composite conversion.

Hence, I expect this to be true on the Focus as well—though this effect will be somewhat blunted by the inclusion of the Data Insights score in the composite conversion.

Makes a lot of sense! I had the same reasoning for this occurrence with the Classic Version's scores but believed GMAC would make scoring on the Verbal section easier or increase the difficulty level of Quant proportionally to mitigate the chances of this affecting the Focus Edition.

I have yet to attempt the mocks so I'm not sure of either theory, but the predictions for percentiles corresponding to the list of possible scores in the Focus Edition still depict it being slightly harder to score in Verbal than in Quant. How that sectional percentile ties into the overall score calculation in the newer version is another variable I'm curious about.

Thanks,
Sim
User avatar
Focus7
Joined: 24 Mar 2023
Last visit: 16 Jun 2025
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 15
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi I just had a small doubt
There are many questions being posted on gmatclub with the source as GMAT prep focus edition
Are these questions from the mocks?
Also if they are, they are being posted by not so famous accounts and some pretty hard questions with 55% or harder being tagged under 600-650? Is this accurate and being checked by the forum moderators?

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Focus7
Joined: 24 Mar 2023
Last visit: 16 Jun 2025
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 15
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Or are the mocks generally tougher in terms of quant! If someone could put my mind at ease!

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
mcelroytutoring
Joined: 10 Jul 2015
Last visit: 19 Mar 2026
Posts: 1,206
Own Kudos:
2,675
 [3]
Given Kudos: 282
Status:Expert GMAT, GRE, and LSAT Tutor / Coach
Affiliations: Harvard University, A.B. with honors in Government, 2002
Location: United States (CO)
Age: 45 (10 years and counting on GMAT Club!)
GMAT 1: 770 Q47 V48
GMAT 2: 730 Q44 V47
GMAT 3: 750 Q50 V42
GMAT 4: 730 Q48 V42 (Online)
GRE 1: Q168 V169
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 4: 730 Q48 V42 (Online)
GRE 1: Q168 V169
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 1,206
Kudos: 2,675
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DATA INSIGHTS ADAPTIVITY UPDATE: I have just been informed that GMAC has added a "correction" banner on the digital version of the 2023-2024 O.G., which states that the Data Insights section is in fact adaptive, and that the information on page 215 of the print version, which indicates the opposite, is incorrect.

Unfortunately, I lack access to the digital version, so I cannot provide a screenshot of this banner.

If someone else could please provide a screenshot, then that would be much appreciated.

The issue is finally settled at last! And not a day too late, because—as we all know—today is the first day of the GMAT Focus.

Good luck, everyone!!
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
So I'm finally done with my GMAT Focus edition exam. Got a 695 overall with scaled score of 90Q/82V/82DI. Will post a detailed prep strategy with mock scores tomorrow. BTW what's the best place to post strategy?

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
mcelroytutoring
Joined: 10 Jul 2015
Last visit: 19 Mar 2026
Posts: 1,206
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 282
Status:Expert GMAT, GRE, and LSAT Tutor / Coach
Affiliations: Harvard University, A.B. with honors in Government, 2002
Location: United States (CO)
Age: 45 (10 years and counting on GMAT Club!)
GMAT 1: 770 Q47 V48
GMAT 2: 730 Q44 V47
GMAT 3: 750 Q50 V42
GMAT 4: 730 Q48 V42 (Online)
GRE 1: Q168 V169
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 4: 730 Q48 V42 (Online)
GRE 1: Q168 V169
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 1,206
Kudos: 2,675
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
NaveenGJ
So I'm finally done with my GMAT Focus edition exam. Got a 695 overall with scaled score of 90Q/82V/82DI. Will post a detailed prep strategy with mock scores tomorrow. BTW what's the best place to post strategy?

Posted from my mobile device
Great score, NaveenGJ!

You can share your GMAT Focus Edition debriefs here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/share-gmat-experience-8/
User avatar
poojaarora1818
Joined: 30 Jul 2019
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,619
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3,808
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Economics
GPA: 3
WE:Human Resources (Real Estate)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
NaveenGJ
So I'm finally done with my GMAT Focus edition exam. Got a 695 overall with scaled score of 90Q/82V/82DI. Will post a detailed prep strategy with mock scores tomorrow. BTW what's the best place to post strategy?

Posted from my mobile device

Congrats! On such a great score. Can you please share your debrief it would be a great help to everyone who are preparing for the New Focus Edition.

Thanks in Advance!
User avatar
Sim_SG3
Joined: 18 Sep 2023
Last visit: 01 Feb 2024
Posts: 237
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 237
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Sustainability
Schools: NUS '27
GPA: 3.49
WE:Operations (Finance)
Schools: NUS '27
Posts: 237
Kudos: 185
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
NaveenGJ
So I'm finally done with my GMAT Focus edition exam. Got a 695 overall with scaled score of 90Q/82V/82DI. Will post a detailed prep strategy with mock scores tomorrow. BTW what's the best place to post strategy?

Posted from my mobile device


Congratulations on the amazing score, NaveenGJ! Thank you in advance for posting your debrief, looking forward to reading it.

All the very best for your applications. Take care.

Thanks,
Sim
User avatar
Sim_SG3
Joined: 18 Sep 2023
Last visit: 01 Feb 2024
Posts: 237
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 237
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Sustainability
Schools: NUS '27
GPA: 3.49
WE:Operations (Finance)
Schools: NUS '27
Posts: 237
Kudos: 185
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Been seeing a couple of users stating the GMAT Focus Edition is adaptive across sections as well. Is this true?

Considering your score also depends on the difficulty level of questions you answer, someone doing exceedingly well in the first two sections would face hell in the third round and be more likely to mess up. It makes no sense to have the harder section count just as much as the two good ones.
Conversely, doing poorly in the first two sections would mean you'd only get low-level questions in the third section and would have virtually no way of saving your score.

The only way out would be to ace absolutely everything or strategically sacrifice questions along the way, both of which seem rather impractical.

Does anyone know if GMAC officially confirmed the adaptive nature of the test would span across sections or is this just a misunderstanding?

Thanks,
Sim
User avatar
GMATCoachBen
Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Last visit: 11 Apr 2026
Posts: 463
Own Kudos:
3,059
 [2]
Given Kudos: 215
Status:Professional GMAT Trainer
Affiliations: GMAT Coach
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT Focus 1: 775 Q87 V90 DI88 (Online)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V44
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V44
GMAT 4: 770 Q50 V45 (Online)
GMAT 5: 780 Q51 V48
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 775 Q87 V90 DI88 (Online)
GMAT 5: 780 Q51 V48
Posts: 463
Kudos: 3,059
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mcelroytutoring
DATA INSIGHTS ADAPTIVITY UPDATE: I have just been informed that GMAC has added a "correction" banner on the digital version of the 2023-2024 O.G., which states that the Data Insights section is in fact adaptive, and that the information on page 215 of the print version, which indicates the opposite, is incorrect.

Unfortunately, I lack access to the digital version, so I cannot provide a screenshot of this banner.

If someone else could please provide a screenshot, then that would be much appreciated.

The issue is finally settled at last! And not a day too late, because—as we all know—today is the first day of the GMAT Focus.

Good luck, everyone!!

mcelroytutoring Thanks, here's the banner, at https://gmatofficialpractice.mba.com/ac ... n-progress:
Attachments

2023-11-07 11_05_23-In Progress.png
2023-11-07 11_05_23-In Progress.png [ 72.11 KiB | Viewed 6509 times ]

User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 43,142
Own Kudos:
83,678
 [2]
Given Kudos: 24,657
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 43,142
Kudos: 83,678
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thank you mcelroytutoring for pointing it out! - you deserve the credit for that banner! 👍
User avatar
mcelroytutoring
Joined: 10 Jul 2015
Last visit: 19 Mar 2026
Posts: 1,206
Own Kudos:
2,675
 [1]
Given Kudos: 282
Status:Expert GMAT, GRE, and LSAT Tutor / Coach
Affiliations: Harvard University, A.B. with honors in Government, 2002
Location: United States (CO)
Age: 45 (10 years and counting on GMAT Club!)
GMAT 1: 770 Q47 V48
GMAT 2: 730 Q44 V47
GMAT 3: 750 Q50 V42
GMAT 4: 730 Q48 V42 (Online)
GRE 1: Q168 V169
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 4: 730 Q48 V42 (Online)
GRE 1: Q168 V169
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 1,206
Kudos: 2,675
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I appear to have found the first official confirmation from GMAC that there is no geometry on the GMAT Focus.

https://start.mba.com/focus-fact-or-fiction

Posted from my mobile device
Attachments

IMG_9283.jpeg
IMG_9283.jpeg [ 267.21 KiB | Viewed 6452 times ]

   1  ...  20   21   22   23   24  ...  31   
Moderators:
191 posts
General GMAT Forum Moderator
473 posts
196 posts