Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
23 Dec 2024, 11:13
Kudos
Bookmarks
A. This contradicts the argument - if many users switch companies that collect no personal data are likely to gain market share. INCORRECT
B. If all users understand the data collection practices, then disclosing those won't cause a significant users to switch. Negation breaks the conclusion. CORRECT
C. The argument does not address the reasons for not adopting, it only focuses on consequences. INCORRECT
D. Even if smaller companies collect significant data, the users will switch from them. Argument doesn't depend on this. INCORRECT
E. This is irrelevant. We don't have to comment on the designing of laws. INCORRECT
Answer B.
B. If all users understand the data collection practices, then disclosing those won't cause a significant users to switch. Negation breaks the conclusion. CORRECT
C. The argument does not address the reasons for not adopting, it only focuses on consequences. INCORRECT
D. Even if smaller companies collect significant data, the users will switch from them. Argument doesn't depend on this. INCORRECT
E. This is irrelevant. We don't have to comment on the designing of laws. INCORRECT
Answer B.
23 Dec 2024, 11:30
Kudos
Bookmarks
IMO B
To determine which assumption the argument relies on, let's break down the argument:
Proposed regulation: Requires software companies to disclose all data collection practices upfront.
Expected outcome: Users may switch to software that collects less personal data.
Consequence: Some companies may lose significant market share.
The argument assumes that users currently lack full knowledge of data collection practices and that this lack of knowledge influences their choice of software. If users were fully aware of the extent of data collection, they might choose different software, leading to a shift in market share.
Let's analyze each option to see which one the argument depends on:
(A) Companies that do not collect personal data will not gain any significant market share from those that do.
This contradicts the argument. The argument suggests that companies that collect less personal data will gain market share.
(B) Some users do not currently understand the extent of data collection involved in the software they use.
This supports the argument. If users do not understand the extent of data collection, disclosing these practices could lead them to switch to software that collects less personal data.
(C) The main reason for not adopting the proposed regulation cited above is to protect major software companies from losing market share.
This is not directly related to the argument. The argument is about the effect of the regulation, not the reasons for or against its adoption.
(D) Only major software companies collect significant amounts of personal data from their users.
This is not necessary for the argument. The argument can hold even if smaller companies also collect significant data.
(E) Disclosure laws should be designed such that software companies are allowed to collect data only if users have explicitly consented to each type of data being collected.
This is a suggestion for how disclosure laws should be designed, not an assumption the argument relies on.
The argument relies on the assumption that users currently do not fully understand the extent of data collection. If they did, they might choose different software, leading to a shift in market share. Therefore, the correct answer is:
(B) Some users do not currently understand the extent of data collection involved in the software they use.
To determine which assumption the argument relies on, let's break down the argument:
Proposed regulation: Requires software companies to disclose all data collection practices upfront.
Expected outcome: Users may switch to software that collects less personal data.
Consequence: Some companies may lose significant market share.
The argument assumes that users currently lack full knowledge of data collection practices and that this lack of knowledge influences their choice of software. If users were fully aware of the extent of data collection, they might choose different software, leading to a shift in market share.
Let's analyze each option to see which one the argument depends on:
(A) Companies that do not collect personal data will not gain any significant market share from those that do.
This contradicts the argument. The argument suggests that companies that collect less personal data will gain market share.
(B) Some users do not currently understand the extent of data collection involved in the software they use.
This supports the argument. If users do not understand the extent of data collection, disclosing these practices could lead them to switch to software that collects less personal data.
(C) The main reason for not adopting the proposed regulation cited above is to protect major software companies from losing market share.
This is not directly related to the argument. The argument is about the effect of the regulation, not the reasons for or against its adoption.
(D) Only major software companies collect significant amounts of personal data from their users.
This is not necessary for the argument. The argument can hold even if smaller companies also collect significant data.
(E) Disclosure laws should be designed such that software companies are allowed to collect data only if users have explicitly consented to each type of data being collected.
This is a suggestion for how disclosure laws should be designed, not an assumption the argument relies on.
The argument relies on the assumption that users currently do not fully understand the extent of data collection. If they did, they might choose different software, leading to a shift in market share. Therefore, the correct answer is:
(B) Some users do not currently understand the extent of data collection involved in the software they use.
23 Dec 2024, 11:57
Kudos
Bookmarks
The argument concludes that requiring software companies to disclose all data collection practices upfront would lead users to switch to software that collects less personal data, causing some companies to lose market share. For this to be true, the argument must assume that user behavior will change when they become aware of the extent of data collection.
(A) Companies that do not collect personal data will not gain any significant market share from those that do.
This contradicts the argument. If companies that collect less or no data do not gain market share, there is no basis for the claim that some companies will lose significant market share.
Eliminate (A).
(B) Some users do not currently understand the extent of data collection involved in the software they use.
For the proposed regulation to cause users to switch to less invasive software, it must be the case that users are currently unaware of the extent of data collection. If users were already aware, the regulation would not meaningfully change their behavior.
Keep (B).
(C) The main reason for not adopting the proposed regulation cited above is to protect major software companies from losing market share.
This is about the motivation for rejecting the regulation, not an assumption required for the argument about user behavior or market share.
Eliminate (C).
(D) Only major software companies collect significant amounts of personal data from their users.
The argument does not require this to be true. Even if smaller companies also collect significant amounts of data, the conclusion about users switching to software with less data collection can still hold.
Eliminate (D).
(E) Disclosure laws should be designed such that software companies are allowed to collect data only if users have explicitly consented to each type of data being collected.
This suggests a prescription for how laws should be designed, but it is not an assumption required for the argument that disclosure will lead users to switch to less invasive software.
Eliminate (E).
The correct option is B because the argument assumes that users currently lack awareness of data collection practices. Without this assumption, the proposed regulation would not lead to a change in user behavior or a loss of market share for companies.
(A) Companies that do not collect personal data will not gain any significant market share from those that do.
This contradicts the argument. If companies that collect less or no data do not gain market share, there is no basis for the claim that some companies will lose significant market share.
Eliminate (A).
(B) Some users do not currently understand the extent of data collection involved in the software they use.
For the proposed regulation to cause users to switch to less invasive software, it must be the case that users are currently unaware of the extent of data collection. If users were already aware, the regulation would not meaningfully change their behavior.
Keep (B).
(C) The main reason for not adopting the proposed regulation cited above is to protect major software companies from losing market share.
This is about the motivation for rejecting the regulation, not an assumption required for the argument about user behavior or market share.
Eliminate (C).
(D) Only major software companies collect significant amounts of personal data from their users.
The argument does not require this to be true. Even if smaller companies also collect significant amounts of data, the conclusion about users switching to software with less data collection can still hold.
Eliminate (D).
(E) Disclosure laws should be designed such that software companies are allowed to collect data only if users have explicitly consented to each type of data being collected.
This suggests a prescription for how laws should be designed, but it is not an assumption required for the argument that disclosure will lead users to switch to less invasive software.
Eliminate (E).
The correct option is B because the argument assumes that users currently lack awareness of data collection practices. Without this assumption, the proposed regulation would not lead to a change in user behavior or a loss of market share for companies.
Bunuel
