We are given the following key premises:
1. Public’s ability to distinguish between reliable and unreliable sources is getting worse.
2. Young adults (early twenties) are more media illiterate than somewhat older adults.
3. Political actors will increasingly use biased media outlets to sway elections.
We are asked: Which conclusion can be properly drawn from this?
This means we need a choice that logically follows from the information provided — no assumptions, opinions, or prescriptions not already supported.
⸻
Let’s analyze each option:
⸻
A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses...
❌ This is a recommendation or proposal, not a conclusion from the stated facts. The passage does not suggest any solution, only describes a problem.
⸻
B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum...
❌ Again, this is prescriptive, suggesting what should be done — not a logical deduction from the premises.
⸻
C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
✅ This logically follows from:
• Young adults are more likely to be media illiterate,
• Biased media will be used to sway elections,
• Therefore, informed voting would require ability to tell reliable from unreliable info.
→ This is conditional (starts with “If”) and stays within bounds of the given info.
⸻
D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism.
❌ Similar to C, but makes a strong assumption: that understanding journalism is the key to resisting propaganda. The passage never mentions journalism education or defines it as the method of improvement.
⸻
E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.
❌ This is an interpretation or speculation not supported by the passage. There’s no mention of confusion between accuracy and ideals, or how young people research candidates.
⸻
✅ Final Answer: C.