GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 18 Oct 2019, 14:55

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Traditionally, public school instructors

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 May 2015
Posts: 215
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V41
Traditionally, public school instructors  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 07 Oct 2018, 05:32
2
2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

78% (01:52) correct 22% (01:56) wrong based on 388 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Traditionally, public school instructors have been compensated according to seniority. Recently, educational experts have criticized the system as one that rewards lackadaisical teaching and reduces motivation to excel. Instead, these experts argue that to retain exceptional teachers and maintain quality instruction, teachers should receive salaries or bonuses based on performance rather than seniority.

Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument of the educational experts?

(A) Some teachers express that financial compensation is not the only factor contributing to job satisfaction and teaching performance.

(B) School districts will develop their own unique compensation structures that may differ greatly from those of other school districts.

(C) Upon leaving the teaching profession, many young, effective teachers cite a lack of opportunity for more rapid financial advancement as a primary factor in the decision to change careers.

(D) In school districts that have implemented pay for performance compensation structures, standardized test scores have dramatically increased.

(E) A merit-based system that bases compensation on teacher performance reduces collaboration, which is an integral component of quality instruction.

_________________
Apoorv

I realize that i cannot change the world....But i can play a part :)

Originally posted by apoorv601 on 02 Jun 2015, 21:57.
Last edited by Skywalker18 on 07 Oct 2018, 05:32, edited 1 time in total.
formatted
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2013
Posts: 144
Re: Traditionally, public school instructors  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jun 2015, 14:40
4
In weaken critical reasoning questions, it is helpful to predict what a correct answer will look like if possible. This is not always easy in strengthen/weaken critical reasoning questions, but doing so can help you avoid tricky trap answers so you should always try.

Here the educational experts are arguing that, in order to retain exception teachers and therefore maintain quality instruction, teachers should receive compensation based on performance and not seniority. According to them, paying teachers based on seniority encourages lackadaisical teaching and reduces motivation.

My prediction going into these answer choices was pretty vague, but essentially I was looking for a reason why changing this metric would not change, or would even hurt, the instruction. I also thought it may somehow involve the idea that low-performing teachers are weeded out early in their careers, and only the best teachers become more tenured. This didn't end up being a correct answer choice, but it is one of the thoughts that I had prior to reviewing the answer choices.

Answer choice A is irrelevant. Of course there are probably other motivations, but if financial compensation is one of the motivations then this argument is still as solid as when we started. The argument never claimed that it has to be the only motivation.

Answer choice B is out of scope. The exact structures of the different school districts don't matter. We are discussing the overarching principle, not the details.

Answer choice C strengthens, not weakens, the argument (common opposite trap answer to weaken questions).

Answer choice D also strengthens the argument by showing positive results in school districts that have taken this action, and therefore this is another trap.

Answer choice E nicely weakens the argument, and is the correct answer. It shows something that would occur that would reduce the quality of instruction if teachers were paid based on performance, and therefore weakens the argument that doing this would result in improved instruction.

I hope this helps!
_________________
Brandon
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

If you found this post helpful, please give me kudos!!! :)

Save $100 on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 May 2015
Posts: 215
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V41
Re: Traditionally, public school instructors  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jun 2015, 23:17
VeritasPrepBrandon wrote:
In weaken critical reasoning questions, it is helpful to predict what a correct answer will look like if possible. This is not always easy in strengthen/weaken critical reasoning questions, but doing so can help you avoid tricky trap answers so you should always try.

Here the educational experts are arguing that, in order to retain exception teachers and therefore maintain quality instruction, teachers should receive compensation based on performance and not seniority. According to them, paying teachers based on seniority encourages lackadaisical teaching and reduces motivation.

My prediction going into these answer choices was pretty vague, but essentially I was looking for a reason why changing this metric would not change, or would even hurt, the instruction. I also thought it may somehow involve the idea that low-performing teachers are weeded out early in their careers, and only the best teachers become more tenured. This didn't end up being a correct answer choice, but it is one of the thoughts that I had prior to reviewing the answer choices.

Answer choice A is irrelevant. Of course there are probably other motivations, but if financial compensation is one of the motivations then this argument is still as solid as when we started. The argument never claimed that it has to be the only motivation.

Answer choice B is out of scope. The exact structures of the different school districts don't matter. We are discussing the overarching principle, not the details.

Answer choice C strengthens, not weakens, the argument (common opposite trap answer to weaken questions).

Answer choice D also strengthens the argument by showing positive results in school districts that have taken this action, and therefore this is another trap.

Answer choice E nicely weakens the argument, and is the correct answer. It shows something that would occur that would reduce the quality of instruction if teachers were paid based on performance, and therefore weakens the argument that doing this would result in improved instruction.

I hope this helps!


Great!! Thanks for the explanation
_________________
Apoorv

I realize that i cannot change the world....But i can play a part :)
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 12 Mar 2017
Posts: 13
Re: Traditionally, public school instructors  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Sep 2017, 20:55
1
My answer is E because collaboration relates directly to quality instruction but performance reduces collaboration ===> E is a weaken one

1 Kudo if you agree
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 24 Jun 2012
Posts: 365
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GPA: 3.76
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Traditionally, public school instructors  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Oct 2017, 02:34
Hi, I need to understand that why C is incorrect and How, as per veritas, C strengthens?
_________________
Push yourself again and again. Don't give an inch until the final buzzer sounds. -Larry Bird
Success isn't something that just happens - success is learned, success is practiced and then it is shared. -Sparky Anderson
-S
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2400
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Traditionally, public school instructors  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Oct 2018, 05:46
1
Traditionally, public school instructors have been compensated according to seniority. Recently, educational experts have criticized the system as one that rewards lackadaisical teaching and reduces motivation to excel. Instead, these experts argue that to retain exceptional teachers and maintain quality instruction, teachers should receive salaries or bonuses based on performance rather than seniority.

Boil it down - to retain exceptional teachers and maintain quality instruction, teachers should receive salaries or bonuses based on performance rather than seniority.

Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument of the educational experts?

(A) Some teachers express that financial compensation is not the only factor contributing to job satisfaction and teaching performance. - Irrelevant - the argument never claims that financial compensation is the ONLY factor and we don't know how many are SOME teachers

(B) School districts will develop their own unique compensation structures that may differ greatly from those of other school districts. - Irrelevant

(C) Upon leaving the teaching profession, many young, effective teachers cite a lack of opportunity for more rapid financial advancement as a primary factor in the decision to change careers. - Incorrect - This strengthens as we know that many young, effective teachers feel that remuneration is not enough and even if they excel in teaching, the hikes will be based on seniority.

(D) In school districts that have implemented pay for performance compensation structures, standardized test scores have dramatically increased. - Incorrect - this strengthens as it shows that level of teaching might have improved

(E) A merit-based system that bases compensation on teacher performance reduces collaboration, which is an integral component of quality instruction. - Correct - So, it will be counterproductive and teachers won't collaborate

sananoor wrote:
Hi, I need to understand that why C is incorrect and How, as per veritas, C strengthens?


Hi sananoor,
As per C, many young, effective teachers feel that remuneration is not enough and even if they excel in teaching, the hikes will be based on seniority.

Hope this helps!! :)
_________________
When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
GMAT Club Bot
Traditionally, public school instructors   [#permalink] 07 Oct 2018, 05:46
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Traditionally, public school instructors

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne