Last visit was: 18 May 2024, 01:02 It is currently 18 May 2024, 01:02
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 518
Own Kudos [?]: 3848 [22]
Given Kudos: 17
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 222
Own Kudos [?]: 912 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Schools: LBS '14 (A$)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 Apr 2013
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Apr 2014
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
Send PM
Re: Traditionally, the study of history has had fixed boundaries and focal [#permalink]
I strongly feel 23 should be B. Look at the following statements:
" The old questions “What happened?” and “How did it happen?” have given way to the question “Why did it happen?” Prominent among the methods used to answer the question “Why” is psychoanalysis, and its use has given rise to psychohistory."

So "what happened" and "How did it happen?” are clearly conventions governing traditional history.

Kudos to anyone who proves me wrong.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Jan 2017
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 10 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: Traditionally, the study of history has had fixed boundaries and focal [#permalink]
Someone explain Q23. It is given that "Psychohistory does not merely use psychological explanations in historical contexts. Historians have always used such explanations when they were appropriate and when there was sufficient evidence for them". From this we can clearly answer the question in option (c), "When do traditional historians consider psychological explanations of historical developments appropriate?". They find it appropriate when there is sufficient evidence for them.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Dec 2016
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Schools: NTU '22 (S)
Send PM
Re: Traditionally, the study of history has had fixed boundaries and focal [#permalink]
Hello,

Can somebody explain why the answer to Q23 cannot be C given the below lines?
Psychohistory does not merely use psychological explanations in historical contexts. Historians have always used such explanations when they were appropriate and when there was sufficient evidence for them.

Also please help me understand why the answer is E.

Thanks.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 May 2018
Posts: 97
Own Kudos [?]: 75 [3]
Given Kudos: 75
Send PM
Re: Traditionally, the study of history has had fixed boundaries and focal [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1. Which of the following best states the main point of the passage?

(A) The approach of psychohistorians to historical study is currently in vogue even though it lacks the rigor and verifiability of traditional historical method. - Right Answer. The passage starts with the introduction of study of history to introduce psychohistorians' point. Then, it explained psychohistorians' approach and its negative aspects.
(B) Traditional historians can benefit from studying the techniques and findings of psychohistorians. - It cant be this because the passage emphasizes on negative aspects of psychohistorians' study.
(C) Areas of sociological study such as childhood and work are of little interest to traditional historians. - This point is mentioned but it is not the main point.
(D) The psychological assessment of an individual’s behavior and attitudes is more informative than the details of his or her daily life. - The psychological assessment is important but it is not compared with the daily life of an individual.
(E) History is composed of unique and nonrepeating events that must be individually analyzed on the basis of publicly verifiable evidence. - This point has been expressed but on the basis of publicly verifiable makes it wrong.

2. It can be inferred from the passage that one way in which traditional history can be distinguished from psychohistory is that traditional history usually

(A) views past events as complex and having their own individuality - in the last paragraph, we can see that psychohistorians' consider opposite thing which author has criticised as being violating the discipline of history. This means people are usually following that.
(B) relies on a single interpretation of human behavior to explain historical events - this is psychohistorian's view
(C) interprets historical events in such a way that their specific nature is transcended - this is psychohistorian's view
(D) turns to psychological explanations in historical contexts to account for events - this is psychohistorian's view
(E) relies strictly on data that are concrete and quantifiable - nothing as such is mentioned.

3. It can be inferred from the passage that the methods used by psycho historians probably prevent them from

(A) presenting their material in chronological order - nothing as such is mentioned.
(B) producing a one-sided picture of an individual’s personality and motivations - psycho historians do this so we can be sure this is not being prevented.
(C) uncovering alternative explanations that might cause them to question their own conclusions - Correct - it is mentioned in the passage - "And it violates the basic tenet of historical method: that historians be alert to the negative instances that would refute their theses."
(D) offering a consistent interpretation of the impact of personality on historical events - psycho historians try to do this from psychological aspect
(E) recognizing connections between a government’s political actions and the aspirations of government leaders - nothing as such is mentioned.

4. The passage supplies information for answering which of the following questions?

(A) What are some specific examples of the use of psychohistory in historical interpretation?
(B) When were the conventions governing the practice of traditional history first established?
(C) When do traditional historians consider psychological explanations of historical developments appropriate?
(D) What sort of historical figure is best suited for psychohistorical analysis?
(E) What is the basic criterion of historical evidence required by traditional historians? - Correct - This is mentioned - It denies the basic criterion of historical evidence: that evidence be publicly accessible to, and therefore assessable by, all historians

5. The author mentions which of the following as a characteristic of the practice of psychohistorians?

(A) The lives of historical figures are presented in episodic rather than narrative form.
(B) Archives used by psychohistorians to gather material are not accessible to other scholars.
(C) Past and current events are all placed within the same deterministic schema. - Correct - This is mentioned in the last paragraph - It imposes upon the past the same determinism that it imposes upon the present, thus robbing people and events of their individuality and of their complexity.
(D) Events in the adult life of a historical figure are seen to be more consequential than are those in the childhood of the figure.
(E) Analysis is focused on group behavior rather than on particular events in an individual’s life.

6. The author of the passage suggests that psychohistorians view history primarily as

(A) a report of events, causes, and effects that is generally accepted by historians but which is, for the most part, unverifiable - nothing as such mentioned.
(B) an episodic account that lacks cohesion because records of the role of childhood, work, and leisure in the lives of historical figures are rare - nothing as such mentioned.
(C) an uncharted sea of seemingly unexplainable events that have meaning only when examined as discrete units - opposite of what psychohistorians view.
(D) a record of the way in which a closed set of immutable psychological laws seems to have shaped events - We can infer this from the last paragraph
(E) a proof of the existence of intricate causal interrelationships between past and present events -history is not considered as a proof.

7. The author of the passage puts the word “deepest” (line 44) in quotation marks most probably in order to

(A) signal her reservations about the accuracy of psychohistorians’ claims for their work - this emphasis points to author's own views being different from that of what PH claims.
(B) draw attention to a contradiction in the psychohistorians’ method
(C) emphasize the major difference between the traditional historians’ method and that of psychohistorians
(D) disassociate her opinion of the psychohistorians’ claims from her opinion of their method
(E) question the usefulness of psychohistorians’ insights into traditional historical scholarship

8. In presenting her analysis, the author does all of the following EXCEPT:

(A) Make general statement without reference to specific examples.
(B) Describe some of the criteria employed by traditional historians.
(C) Question the adequacy of the psychohistorians’ interpretation of events.
(D) Point out inconsistencies in the psychohistorians’ application of their methods.
(E) Contrast the underlying assumptions of psychohistorians with those of traditional historians.

Can somebody give the answer to 8th question? I dont agree with D being OA.

Also, let me know if i am correct in other explanations!
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2016
Posts: 193
Own Kudos [?]: 56 [0]
Given Kudos: 446
Location: India
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V42
Send PM
Re: Traditionally, the study of history has had fixed boundaries and focal [#permalink]
carcass

Can you please explain Q3
3. It can be inferred from the passage that the methods used by psychohistorians probably prevent them from

(A) presenting their material in chronological order
(B) producing a one-sided picture of an individual’s personality and motivations
(C) uncovering alternative explanations that might cause them to question their own conclusions
(D) offering a consistent interpretation of the impact of personality on historical events
(E) recognizing connections between a government’s political actions and the aspirations of government leaders

I understand where C is coming from but I dont understand why B is incorrect?

Psychohistory derives its “facts” not from history, the detailed records of events and their consequence, but from psychoanalysis of the individuals who made history, and deduces its theories not from this or that instance in their lives , but from a view of human nature that transcends history.

Is it wrong to deduce from here that it is not just one viewpoint that is being considered as right or wrong but pyschonalysis of various historians and hence it prevents from providing one sided picture.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Jun 2018
Posts: 46
Own Kudos [?]: 12 [0]
Given Kudos: 75
Send PM
Re: Traditionally, the study of history has had fixed boundaries and focal [#permalink]
please give explanation to 8 th
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17312
Own Kudos [?]: 851 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Traditionally, the study of history has had fixed boundaries and focal [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Traditionally, the study of history has had fixed boundaries and focal [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6929 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
14030 posts