Under the influence of today’s computer-oriented culture, publishing

9. Under the influence of today’s computer-oriented culture, publishing for children has taken on a flashy new look that emphasizes illustrations and graphic design; the resulting lack of substance leads to books that are short-lived items covering mainly trendy subjects. The changes also include more humorous content, simplification of difficult material, and a narrower focus on specific topics.
Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?
A. The inclusion of humorous material and a narrower focus detract from the substance of a children’s book.
B. The substance of a children’s book is important to its longevity.
C. Children of the computer generation cannot concentrate on long, unbroken sections of prose.
D. Children judge books primarily on the basis of graphic design.
E. The lack of substance of a children’s book is unlikely to be important to its popularity.

COC => Flashy => lack of substance => Book life drops => Trendy books.

Can anyone explain how we derive OA from above implications .
Thanks
Source: 300 CR

Hi, can someone please explain me why E is wrong? I was undecided between B and E..

9. Under the influence of today’s computer-oriented culture, publishing for children has taken on a flashy new look that emphasizes illustrations and graphic design; the resulting lack of substance leads to books that are short-lived items covering mainly trendy subjects. The changes also include more humorous content, simplification of difficult material, and a narrower focus on specific topics.
Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?
A. The inclusion of humorous material and a narrower focus detract from the substance of a children’s book.
B. The substance of a children’s book is important to its longevity.
C. Children of the computer generation cannot concentrate on long, unbroken sections of prose.
D. Children judge books primarily on the basis of graphic design.
E. The lack of substance of a children’s book is unlikely to be important to its popularity.

COC => Flashy => lack of substance => Book life drops => Trendy books.

Can anyone explain how we derive OA from above implications .
Thanks
Source: 300 CR

9. Under the influence of today’s computer-oriented culture, publishing for children has taken on a flashy new look that emphasizes illustrations and graphic design; the resulting lack of substance leads to books that are short-lived items covering mainly trendy subjects. The changes also include more humorous content, simplification of difficult material, and a narrower focus on specific topics.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?

A. The inclusion of humorous material and a narrower focus detract from the substance of a children’s book. - Can't be inferred.It says that "illustrations and graphic design" are more emphasized and probably more added, but doesn't say that it decreases or replaces substance of a children’s book. Content can be added without decreasing other content. Moreover there were 3 factors "more humorous content, simplification of difficult material, and a narrower focus on specific topics" not two. Many reasosn to eliminate this answer.

B. The substance of a children’s book is important to its longevity. - Only one left. Paraphrase of sentence in argument.

C. Children of the computer generation cannot concentrate on long, unbroken sections of prose. - Nothing relevant to argument except word "children"

D. Children judge books primarily on the basis of graphic design. - Can't be inferred. "flashy new look that emphasizes illustrations and graphic design" Moreover nothing said about importance of graphic design over illustrations. It says emphasizes (highlights) not primary. Nothing about judgement.

E. The lack of substance of a children’s book is unlikely to be important to its popularity. - Out of scope. Nothing mentioned about popularity