OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONProject SC Butler: Sentence Correction (SC2)
Quote:
Unlike the law protecting endangered animals, the Fish and Wildlife Service’s listing of endangered plants does not prohibit collectors
to take listed plants from the wild if in doing so they comply with state laws.
A)
to take listed plants from the wild if in doing so they comply with state laws
B) from taking listed plants from the wild
if they are so doing in compliance with state laws
C) from taking listed plants from the wild if in doing so they comply with state laws
D)
who take listed plants from the wild
should they be in compliance with state laws
E)
that take listed plants from the wild
so long as they are doing so by being in compliance with state laws
• Meaning?→
People can remove endangered plants from the wild if those people comply with state law.• Issues tested→ IDIOM - one of the most commonly tested on the GMAT (see below)
→
diction and
style Diction means
choice of words especially with regard to correctness, clearness, or effectiveness, defined
here.
-- almost always, chose the option whose verb voice matches the verb voice in the non-underlined portion (if that latter portion contains such a verb)
If the non-underlined portion is in active voice, choose the option whose verb is also written in active voice.
If the non-underlined portion is in passive voice, choose the option whose verb is also written in passive voice.
-- check pronouns and pronoun placement: which option conveys the antecedent most clearly?
Style is much harder to define, but generally means "writing that follows established norms of Standard Written English."
--
concision is an issue of style: if you can say exactly the same thing in fewer words, you should do so
-- as a general rule, an active verb (comply) is preferred to an action noun (compliance).
-- although aspirants can get a decent sense of "style" by studying published official questions, I believe that reading well-written prose (including novels) is the best way to learn style.
• Split #1 - The correct idiom is Prohibit X from YProhibit X from Y is among the most common idioms that GMAC tests.
Magoosh, for example, includes
Prohibit X from Y in its Top Ten GMAT Idioms List, which you can find
here. That post was updated on September 14, 2020.
Because that list seems to shift around on the
Magoosh GMAT Blog, I have uploaded the list for you.
At the bottom of the post is the attachment.
I occasionally have issues with uploads. I will see whether I can insert the upload immediately below. If not, it will still be at the bottom of the page. I'd take a look if I were you.
Attachment:
The attachment TOP 10 IDIOMS ON THE GMAT - MAGOOSH BLOG.pdf is no longer available
In other words, when you see the word "prohibit," start looking for the word
from.In addition, look for the structure that follows
Prohibit X (collectors) From Y (taking listed plants from the wild).
Options A, D, and E do not use the idiom properly.
Those three options do not use the word
from.
A)
wrong: prohibit . . . TO takeD)
wrong: prohibit . . . should they beE)
wrong: prohibit . . . so long as they are doing so by beingEliminate A, D, and E
→ D and E contain other errors.
In D, "should they be in compliance" is stilted and not as good as the simple "if they comply" in option C.
-- although
should is common in British English, in U.S. English,
should connotes obligation, not condition.
-- as far as I can recall, no correct answer to an official question contained the word
should in a conditional or subjunctive context
In E,
so long as they are doing so by being in compliance should give you pause. That long string of words means "if they comply." Choose the short version.
• Split #2: Diction and Style→ Here are the remaining options, B and C, in a shortened sentence:
B)
[T]he Fish and Wildlife Service’s listing of endangered plants does not prohibit collectors from taking listed plants from the wild if they are so doing in compliance with state laws.
C)
[T]he Fish and Wildlife Service’s listing of endangered plants does not prohibit collectors from taking listed plants from the wild if in doing so they comply with state laws.→
Compare differencesB)
if they are doing so in complianceC)
if in doing so they comply(1) concision: options B and C say the same thing, but (C) is shorter
(2) the verb voice in C is better than that in B
→ the active verb
comply in (C)
-- matches the prompt's active voice (active:
P does not prohibit Q; passive:
Q is not prohibited by P), and
-- is crisper, punchier, and more concise than the passive verb phrase structure in (B),
are . . . in complianceAs a general rule, if the non-underlined portion is written in active voice, as is the case here, then pick the verb that is also in active voice.
If the non-underlined portion is in passive voice, pick the verb that is written in passive voice.
(3) Verbs usually trump action nouns
A verb (comply) is typically preferred to an action noun (compliance).
Verbs are the drivers of good English prose.
(4) clarity: the placement of the pronoun
they is better in (C) than in (B)
→
They must refer to
collectors.
Theoretically, we have two antecedents:
collectors and
plants.
Logically, we have only one antecedent:
collectors.
Plants cannot
comply with state laws.
Nor
are plants in compliance with state laws.
We are not confused.
They refers to
collectors. Option B does not contain pronoun ambiguity.
But the placement in B makes us work harder than we work in C.
In option B,
they is separated from
are in compliance with. The latter phrase is the clearest sign that
they means
collectors.Although Option B does not contain pronoun ambiguity, option C, by placing
they and the verb
comply together, immediately signals that
they means
collectors.
As noted, plants cannot comply.
Option C's use of
they, in other words, is clearer than that in option B.
Eliminate B.
The correct answer is CNotesTakeaway: Do not get distracted by esoteric turns of phrase. Look for other issues.In so doing v.
In doing so is a distraction and a waste of your time.
Learn to ignore distractions.
Signs that you face a distraction include rarely seen phrasing, meanings that seem the same, and an unusually hard struggle to parse the meaning.
You may have seen
in so doing, though the phrase is stodgy and mostly used in legal briefs. (Just ask me).
If you have been reading even 20 minutes a day of prose in English, you will have seen the second phrase,
in doing so.
Whether those two phrases mean the same thing or not is: 1) too hard to decide quickly and 2) too hard to decide, full stop.
At some point, you must start gaming this GMAT game.
Learn what GMAC uses to distract and ignore the bait.
Ignore
in so doing versus
in doing so.
Takeaway: Learn to Identify DistractionsHow would you know that
in so doing and
in doing so are phrases that will take you down a rabbit hole?
→ Notice that "in so doing" is either unfamiliar or uncommon.
→ Think about how infrequently you see these phrases and conclude that if these two phrases were indeed an idiomatic split, GMAC would be pushing the envelope of what is fair.
→ Notice that you have little to no idea whether they mean the same thing and that trying to parse the meaning is getting you nowhere.
→ Decide quickly that this pair is too hard.
Then look for other errors. We found four differences between options B and C.
Under time pressure, the first reason, concision, would be enough to make a decision.
If the phrases are unusual or their difference is not apparent,
let go, move on, and look for other errors.
Be a strategist.
Concision and verb voice are real factors.
Option C is more concise than B.
Option C preserves the active voice contained in the non-underlined portion.
Concision and verb voice consistency are or should be familiar concepts. Use what is familiar.
vijk , I am glad that you asked a question about whether (C) changes the meaning.
I'm sure that others are wondering the same thing.
Answer? No.
C) . . . the Fish and Wildlife Service’s listing of endangered plants does not prohibit collectors
from taking listed plants from the wild if in doing so they comply with state laws.
in doing so is a substitution for
taking listed plants from the wild.
We use
in doing so in order to avoid repetition.
Replace
in doing so with
taking listed plants from the wild, which is the phrase that
in doing so stands in for.
The sentence is bulky and clunky but neither ungrammatical nor incorrect in meaning.
COMMENTSRajat8 and
Fdambro294 , welcome to SC Butler.
(
Rajat8 , I may have welcomed you before, perhaps a few months ago. If so, you get a second welcome.)
I am extremely pleased with these answers.
For the most part they display thoughtful consideration rather than knee-jerk rule invocation; conscientious and helpful explanations; and good critical reasoning skills.
Nicely done.
--