Last visit was: 26 Apr 2026, 22:46 It is currently 26 Apr 2026, 22:46
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
nightblade354
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,769
Own Kudos:
7,119
 [9]
Given Kudos: 3,305
Status:He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Going to Business School -- Corruptus in Extremis
Location: United States (MA)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,769
Kudos: 7,119
 [9]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Heisenberg12
Joined: 10 Jun 2016
Last visit: 16 Apr 2019
Posts: 70
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 589
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.3
WE:Project Management (Energy)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
DharLog
Joined: 26 Jun 2017
Last visit: 04 Mar 2019
Posts: 312
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 334
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
WE:Information Technology (Other)
Posts: 312
Kudos: 345
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
redskull1
Joined: 11 Feb 2018
Last visit: 25 Sep 2022
Posts: 287
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 115
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 3: 750 Q50 V42
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Not buying E as the answer.Not developing storage equipment is in no way related to encouraging people to use solar equipment.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
DharLog
Joined: 26 Jun 2017
Last visit: 04 Mar 2019
Posts: 312
Own Kudos:
345
 [1]
Given Kudos: 334
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
WE:Information Technology (Other)
Posts: 312
Kudos: 345
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
redskull1
Not buying E as the answer.Not developing storage equipment is in no way related to encouraging people to use solar equipment.

Posted from my mobile device

We talk about using solar energy (not solar equipment).

How do we encourage people to use solar energy? We talk about advantages of using it.
We have to weaken the argument, so we have to discourage them from using it ---> we talk about disadbantages of using it.

Storage equipment for solar energy is not developed ---> We can not makes reserves of solar energy ---> we depend to much on the availability of the sun (if there are clouds, we can not catch energy from the sun ---> we have not energy for our needs at these moments) ---> this discourages peope from using solar energy ---> it weakens the argument.
avatar
PedroBodnar
Joined: 11 Feb 2016
Last visit: 06 Jan 2019
Posts: 9
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 9
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nightblade354
Unlike the more traditional energy sources of coal, gas, and nuclear energy, energy from the sun produces no major problems. It produces no pollution and requires no transportation from foreign lands. It threatens no one with radiation dangers and is not controlled by powerful corporations. Therefore, we should encourage people to use solar energy.

Which of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens this argument?

(A) There have been very few studies of solar energy use by households
(B) The cost of oil and gas could be regulated to make it less costly for home consumption
(C) The cost of the equipment required to collect enough solar energy for a family of four equals the amount a family now pays for oil, gas, or nuclear produced energy in one year
(D) Most critics of solar energy are connected to energy monopolies
(E) An effective way for families to capture and store solar energy has not yet been developed

Source: CR Archive

Sorry, but I don't think any answer choice here is valid. I know that we 're not supposed to bring outside information to this question, but check this out:

It is still possible that private- or government-owned solar panel farms generate the energy which families will be encouraged to use. Families not being able to capture and store solar energy just mean that they will need to get it from other source.

Furthermore, it is waaaaaaaaaay to far to imply that the energy families would use would be from their own-sourced generation.
avatar
Lowkya
Joined: 11 Apr 2018
Last visit: 21 Dec 2019
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 139
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 91
Kudos: 50
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion: we should encourage people to use solar energy.

Assumption: Advantages of solar energy is enough to use it for the household.

To prove: Weaken the assumption.

(A) There have been very few studies of solar energy use by households.
Few studies don't necessarily prove that it is not an effective solution to the household.
(B) The cost of oil and gas could be regulated to make it less costly for home consumption.
We are focusing on usability and cost is not a major role here. Out of focus.
(C) The cost of the equipment required to collect enough solar energy for a family of four equals the amount a family now pays for oil, gas, or nuclear-produced energy in one year.
Out of focus. Maybe only installation charges are high and post it is lower than coal, oil, and gas.
(D) Most critics of solar energy are connected to energy monopolies.
Out of focus.
(E) An effective way for families to capture and store solar energy has not yet been developed.
This true we cannot suggest or encourage people to use it for the household. So, weakens the argument.
avatar
Lowkya
Joined: 11 Apr 2018
Last visit: 21 Dec 2019
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
50
 [1]
Given Kudos: 139
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 91
Kudos: 50
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
PedroBodnar
nightblade354
Unlike the more traditional energy sources of coal, gas, and nuclear energy, energy from the sun produces no major problems. It produces no pollution and requires no transportation from foreign lands. It threatens no one with radiation dangers and is not controlled by powerful corporations. Therefore, we should encourage people to use solar energy.

Which of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens this argument?

(A) There have been very few studies of solar energy use by households
(B) The cost of oil and gas could be regulated to make it less costly for home consumption
(C) The cost of the equipment required to collect enough solar energy for a family of four equals the amount a family now pays for oil, gas, or nuclear produced energy in one year
(D) Most critics of solar energy are connected to energy monopolies
(E) An effective way for families to capture and store solar energy has not yet been developed

Source: CR Archive

Sorry, but I don't think any answer choice here is valid. I know that we 're not supposed to bring outside information to this question, but check this out:

It is still possible that private- or government-owned solar panel farms generate the energy which families will be encouraged to use. Families not being able to capture and store solar energy just mean that they will need to get it from other source.

Furthermore, it is waaaaaaaaaay to far to imply that the energy families would use would be from their own-sourced generation.


It is still possible that private- or government-owned solar panel farms generate the energy which families will be encouraged to use. Families not being able to capture and store solar energy just mean that they will need to get it from other source.

Yes, may be but as it is not stated in the argument we should not consider it.
Remember that if it says "A cat is a dog" also we have to accept that is true and answer the question.

Furthermore, it is waaaaaaaaaay to far to imply that the energy families would use would be from their own-sourced generation.
Yes, we cannot tell this too.
But, the focus here is on the conclusion that "Solar energy should be encouraged for the household".
So, the option we have to choose should be something that weakens this point.

Hope this answers your questions.
Thanks.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,421
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,421
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
506 posts
361 posts