noboru
Until now, this painting was believed to be a self portrait of the artist, but it probably is not. True, the heavy gold chain worn by the gentleman in the picture is similar to one presented to the artist by the Queen of England after he had painted her portrait. But the sword hanging at the gentleman’s hip suggests that he was a knight, a rank higher than any the artist ever attained.
Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the author’s argument?
(A) Historians cannot determine whether the artist was ever knighted.
(B) The artist painted only one self-portrait in his entire life.
(C) Several gentlemen of the artist’s day wore heavy gold chains like the one in the painting.
(D) The gentleman in the painting resembles portraits of the artist painted by other artists.
(E) The artist was the only gentleman of his day who received a heavy gold chain from the Queen of England.
I want to take a closer look at (D)
(D) The gentleman in the painting resembles portraits of the artist painted by other artists.
I think (D) is not irrelevant but weakens the author's conclusion that the painting is probably NOT a self-portrait of the artist." Note that in the argument the author says "THE artist", which means a particular/specific artist. If (D) is true, then it is more likely that the painting is a self-portrait of THE artist because it looks similar to portraits of THE artist by other artists. Hence, (D) weakens the conclusion and is incorrect.
(A) Historians cannot determine whether the artist was ever knighted. -- WEAKEN
(B) The artist painted only one self-portrait in his entire life. - IRRELEVANT
(C) Several gentlemen of the artist’s day wore heavy gold chains like the one in the painting. --STRENGTHEN (correct)
(D) The gentleman in the painting resembles portraits of the artist painted by other artists. -- WEAKEN
(E) The artist was the only gentleman of his day who received a heavy gold chain from the Queen of England. -- WEAKEN