Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 1008:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Sep 0812:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Looking for your GMAT motivation to break through the score plateau? Pragati improved her score by massive 160 points with strategic guidance and hard-work! Find out how personalized mentorship and a strong mindset can turn GMAT struggles into success.
Sep 1001:00 AM EDT
-02:00 AM EDT
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2107:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
65%
(hard)
Question Stats:
58% (01:53) correct
42%
(02:03)
wrong
based on 7029
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
New hardy varieties of rice show promise of producing high yields without the costly requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high yielding varieties.
(A) requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high yielding varieties
(B) requirements by earlier high yielding varieties of application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation
(C) requirements for application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation of earlier high yielding varieties
(D) application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation that was required by earlier high yielding varieties
(E) irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer that were required by earlier high yielding varieties
(A) requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high yielding varieties
(B) requirements by earlier high yielding varieties of application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation
(C) requirements for application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation of earlier high yielding varieties
(D) application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation that was required by earlier high yielding varieties
(E) irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer that were required by earlier high yielding varieties
https://www.nytimes.com/1984/08/14/science/new-varieties-of-hardy-rice-hold-promise.html
The new varieties promise to give high yields without the costly irrigation required by the earlier ''miracle'' rice strains developed at the International Rice Research Institute here. The new strains have not yet been tested in farmers' fields, but one particularly promising variety has produced test yields more than twice as large as those from traditional varieties.
So in the 1970's the mission of rice scientists became to develop high-yielding strains that were also resistant to disease and insect pests. That second frontier, too, was crossed, and once again the institute led the way. A strain called IR-36, the progeny of 13 different varieties from six countries, is the best example of that effort. First planted by farmers in the Philippines in 1976, IR-36 is now grown on more than 24.7 million acres of rice lands throughout the world.
Progress is likely to proceed gradually for two main reasons. First, breakthroughs inevitably become harder to come by as the work advances. Second, while the irrigated environments for earlier high-yielding varieties tend to be uniform, the adverse conditions of rain-fed areas vary tremendously. Some areas are drought-prone, but others are frequently flooded.
The new varieties promise to give high yields without the costly irrigation required by the earlier ''miracle'' rice strains developed at the International Rice Research Institute here. The new strains have not yet been tested in farmers' fields, but one particularly promising variety has produced test yields more than twice as large as those from traditional varieties.
So in the 1970's the mission of rice scientists became to develop high-yielding strains that were also resistant to disease and insect pests. That second frontier, too, was crossed, and once again the institute led the way. A strain called IR-36, the progeny of 13 different varieties from six countries, is the best example of that effort. First planted by farmers in the Philippines in 1976, IR-36 is now grown on more than 24.7 million acres of rice lands throughout the world.
Progress is likely to proceed gradually for two main reasons. First, breakthroughs inevitably become harder to come by as the work advances. Second, while the irrigated environments for earlier high-yielding varieties tend to be uniform, the adverse conditions of rain-fed areas vary tremendously. Some areas are drought-prone, but others are frequently flooded.
Solving this question helps.
Taking a timed set of similar questions in
GMAT Club Forum Quiz →
is even better.
This topic is deep. The first point is to note is that the requirements are not themselves costly but the factors that are required such as the application of fertilizers and irrigation are costly. That is the reason we can dispense with choice A, B, and C instantly
In D, a couple of factors are denoted by a singular verb 'was'.
Only E remains.
_________________
In D, a couple of factors are denoted by a singular verb 'was'.
Only E remains.
_________________
Thank you Daagh for your time on GMAT Club and all your contributions! Thank you for everything you did!
Your work will remain a great tribute to you here on GMAT Club!
-bb
Your work will remain a great tribute to you here on GMAT Club!
-bb
Well the sentence is trying to say, the new variety of rice shows promise of producing high yields without X and Y when compared to old variety of rice, which required both X and Y.
If we break
X - requirements of irrigation
Y - application of commercial fertilizer
New hardy varieties of rice show promise of producing high yields without the costly requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high-yielding varieties.
(A) requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high-yielding varieties
without X and Y by earlier high-yielding varieties - ambiguous comparison .
(B) requirements by earlier high-yielding varieties of application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation
without X by....and Y -don't need to say further
(C) requirements for application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation of earlier high-yielding varieties
ugly -here we have split X itself.
(D) application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation that was required by earlier high-yielding varieties
without Y and X that was....Was is a problem here. We are talking about additive phrase , need plural were.
(E) irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer that were required by earlier high-yielding varieties
without X and Y that were required by earlier....clean comparison..agreement on pronoun
_________________
If we break
X - requirements of irrigation
Y - application of commercial fertilizer
New hardy varieties of rice show promise of producing high yields without the costly requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high-yielding varieties.
(A) requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high-yielding varieties
without X and Y by earlier high-yielding varieties - ambiguous comparison .
(B) requirements by earlier high-yielding varieties of application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation
without X by....and Y -don't need to say further
(C) requirements for application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation of earlier high-yielding varieties
ugly -here we have split X itself.
(D) application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation that was required by earlier high-yielding varieties
without Y and X that was....Was is a problem here. We are talking about additive phrase , need plural were.
(E) irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer that were required by earlier high-yielding varieties
without X and Y that were required by earlier....clean comparison..agreement on pronoun
_________________
I started concentrating so hard on my vision that I lost sight.
Posts: 65
i think the best explanation for this question is to look at the meaning of the sentence. Requirements and application cannot be costly. Only the irrigation can, therefore right away you eliminate A, B, C and D, leaving you with E, which is the correct answer.
General Discussion
Posts: 48
New hardy varieties of rice show promise of producing high yields without the costly requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high-yielding varieties.
(A) requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high-yielding varieties
(B) requirements by earlier high-yielding varieties of application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation
(C) requirements for application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation of earlier high-yielding varieties
(D) application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation that was required by earlier high-yielding varieties
(E) irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer that were required by earlier high-yielding varieties
OA=E
Q: I understand "and" is a conjunction joining the two, but still everything I've read says that "that," "which," and "who," refer back to the noun or noun phrase directly preceding it. Therefore, allowing the plural "were" means this whole idea of the relative pronoun only being able to encapsulate the directly proceeding noun or noun phrase is totally out the window is it not???
(A) requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high-yielding varieties
(B) requirements by earlier high-yielding varieties of application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation
(C) requirements for application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation of earlier high-yielding varieties
(D) application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation that was required by earlier high-yielding varieties
(E) irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer that were required by earlier high-yielding varieties
OA=E
Q: I understand "and" is a conjunction joining the two, but still everything I've read says that "that," "which," and "who," refer back to the noun or noun phrase directly preceding it. Therefore, allowing the plural "were" means this whole idea of the relative pronoun only being able to encapsulate the directly proceeding noun or noun phrase is totally out the window is it not???
Posts: 607
stringworm
A relative pronoun can refer to the noun, or the noun phrase, before it. Occasionally, it's not clear whether a modifier is referring to the single noun or to the entire noun phrase that precedes it. For instance,
"The policies of the so-called 'purple' faction of the government, renowned for byzantine complexity..." would probably not be correct on the GMAT because it's unclear whether the modifier 'renowned for corruption' could be modifying the policies, faction, or government.
However, if a modifier can only apply grammatically to a single part of the noun phrase, then there is no ambiguity. "The policies of the so-called 'purple' faction of the government, renowned for their byzantine complexity..." could be considered right, because the word 'their' in the modifier unmistakably refers to the plural noun 'policies' at the very beginning of the long prepositional noun phrase. We can't possibly be confused into thinking 'their' refers to a single faction or a single government.
In choice E, the word 'were' following the word 'that' means that the relative clause MUST refer back to the plural noun at the beginning of the noun phrase--in this case, the compound subject "requirements and application."
Note that "Application.... and requirements...that were" would probably NOT be okay! In this hypothetical case, the were could refer to 'requirements' or to 'application and requirements'.
Hope this helps!
Posts: 48
Thank you, that is helpful, but it leads me more to this Sentence Correction Catch-22 dilemma I constantly find myself in. Although here, I mainly want to address subject/verb agreement; you do bring up that which I also wonder about in reference to ambiguous pronouns. Often times, we say a pronoun is not ambiguous because it would not make sense otherwise. And then in another occasion, the pronoun is ambiguous because it does not make sense. I believe I have resolved this for the most part. But here, what is wrong with choice D? And based on your explanation; so can we never eliminate answer choices due to subject/verb disagreement in the presence of a "which," "that," or "who." I know that a relative pronoun can modify a noun or the whole noun phrase, but I'm very surprised that here it reaches out to two separate nouns just because it has a coordinated conjunction...but I guess that's allowed so I'll shut up now.
Posts: 607
In (D), the modifier "that was required" has the singular verb 'was', so it CANNOT refer to the compound subject "Application...and irrigation." This messes up the meaning of the sentence. Also, the 'that was is still ambiguous' because the 'and' is ambiguous; in (D), it's not clear whether we're talking about the "application of [commercial fertilizer and irrigation]" or the "[application of commertical fertilizer] and irrigation.
Posts: 48
Take for example:
The application of red, white, and blue, which were patriotic, my mom loved.
-Here we can use the plural tense "were" to know that the author finds the colors patriotic.
(Let's just assume the country is taken over by foreigners and those colors are indeed patriotic colors as opposed to colors being patriotic).
or
The application of red, white, and blue, which was patriotic, my mom loved.
-Here we can use the singular tense "was" to know that the author found the application itself to be patriotic.
This is why I don't believe (D) is guilty of being ambiguous as you say it is. Sometimes, we use the tense to clear ambiguity and other times we say it's the cause of it...hence the grammar catch-22 I want to be debunked.
The application of red, white, and blue, which were patriotic, my mom loved.
-Here we can use the plural tense "were" to know that the author finds the colors patriotic.
(Let's just assume the country is taken over by foreigners and those colors are indeed patriotic colors as opposed to colors being patriotic).
or
The application of red, white, and blue, which was patriotic, my mom loved.
-Here we can use the singular tense "was" to know that the author found the application itself to be patriotic.
This is why I don't believe (D) is guilty of being ambiguous as you say it is. Sometimes, we use the tense to clear ambiguity and other times we say it's the cause of it...hence the grammar catch-22 I want to be debunked.
Posts: 607
stringworm
You second sentence would not be correct on the GMAT, because 'was' could refer to 'blue' or to 'application'. It would probably not be a correct answer to a GMAT question.
-Eli
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85 
Posts: 3,004
There's another problem with D. Irrigation isn't being applied. If you look at the full range of choices, "irrigation" and "application of comemrcial fertilizer" are treated as distinct elements. In both A (original) and E (correct), "irrigation" comes first. Two things are required: 1) irrigation and 2) application of commercial fertilizer, so we need "were" even without the ambiguity issue.
_________________
_________________
Manhattan Prep Instructor from 2009-2025
Posts: 31
A) requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high yielding varieties – this should be applicable to both "irrigation" and "application of commercial fertilizer". There is ambiguity on applicability to both the aspects
B) requirements by earlier high yielding varieties of application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation – illogical meaning
C) requirements for application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation of earlier high yielding varieties. – changes meaning. this should be applicable to both irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer
D) application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation that was required by earlier high yielding varieties. – "application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation", plural "were" should be used. "earlier high yielding varieties" now correctly applies to both the aspects.
E) irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer that were required by earlier high yielding varieties. – "earlier high yielding varieties" now correctly applies to both the aspects.
Thanks
B) requirements by earlier high yielding varieties of application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation – illogical meaning
C) requirements for application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation of earlier high yielding varieties. – changes meaning. this should be applicable to both irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer
D) application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation that was required by earlier high yielding varieties. – "application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation", plural "were" should be used. "earlier high yielding varieties" now correctly applies to both the aspects.
E) irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer that were required by earlier high yielding varieties. – "earlier high yielding varieties" now correctly applies to both the aspects.
Thanks
New hardy varieties of rice show promise of producing high yields without the costly requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high yielding varieties.
(A) requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high yielding varieties
this option says that application of CF was done by earlier high yielding rice varieties ... This is definitely not the meaning intended...
(B) requirements by earlier high yielding varieties of application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation
this option says "application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation" again not the intended meaning ...
(C) requirements for application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation of earlier high yielding varieties
Again similar to option B...application of commercial fertilize and irrigation !!!!"
(D) application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation that was required by earlier high yielding varieties
"Was" is grammatically incorrect ...we need a plural verb
(E) irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer that were required by earlier high yielding varieties
Was replaced by Were and Bingo ..no other errors...
_________________
(A) requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high yielding varieties
this option says that application of CF was done by earlier high yielding rice varieties ... This is definitely not the meaning intended...
(B) requirements by earlier high yielding varieties of application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation
this option says "application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation" again not the intended meaning ...
(C) requirements for application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation of earlier high yielding varieties
Again similar to option B...application of commercial fertilize and irrigation !!!!"
(D) application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation that was required by earlier high yielding varieties
"Was" is grammatically incorrect ...we need a plural verb
(E) irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer that were required by earlier high yielding varieties
Was replaced by Were and Bingo ..no other errors...
_________________
Choice E) seems kind of ambiguous as well, using costly directly in front of irrigation. That could easily mean that only the irrigation is costly, not the application of fertilizer—a change in the original meaning.
I think this is a rather poor question.
I think this is a rather poor question.
aniket16c
Current Student
Joined: 20 Oct 2018
Last visit: 04 Jan 2026
Posts: 176
Location: India
Schools: Ross '24 (D) Darden '24 (A)
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
GPA: 4
shoonya
Meaning - New varieties show promise of producing high yields --> they can produce high yields without the costly required that were required by high yielding varieties. The yields were - irrigation + application of commercial fertilizer
(A) requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high yielding varieties
- "requirements of irrigation" + "application ... fertilizer" = parallelism is correct
- application by earlier varieties - this gives a very funny meaning. It presents meaning as though the fertilizer is getting applied using high yielding varieties.
- Wrong
(B) requirements by earlier high yielding varieties of application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation
- application of (commercial fertilizer + irrigation) - ambiguity in parallelism
- "requirements of" would have been a better option
- Wrong
(C) requirements for application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation of earlier high yielding varieties
- "application of commercial fertilizer" is separated from "high yielding varieties" and the latter only modifies "irrigation" - Change in meaning
- Wrong
(D) application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation that was required by earlier high yielding varieties
- application of (commercial fertilizer + irrigation) - ambiguity in parallelism
- If application and irrigation are considered as separate entities then "high yielding varieties" modifies only irrigation - Change in meaning
- Wrong
(E) irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer that were required by earlier high yielding varieties
- "requirements of irrigation" + "application ... fertilizer" = parallelism is correct
- Both were required by "varieties" - correct modification
- Correct
sampriya
ISB School Moderator
Joined: 23 Nov 2018
Last visit: 25 Nov 2022
Posts: 297
Location: India
Schools: Schulich Sept '23 HEC Jan'22 Intake (D) INSEAD Jan 22 intake Erasmus RSM "22 (D) Ivey '22 (D) ISB '23 (I) NUS '23 (D)
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39
GPA: 2.88
Products:
Schools: Schulich Sept '23 HEC Jan'22 Intake (D) INSEAD Jan 22 intake Erasmus RSM "22 (D) Ivey '22 (D) ISB '23 (I) NUS '23 (D)
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39
Posts: 297
shoonya
when we expand the option C we get
without the costly requirements for application of commercial fertilizer and application of irrigation of earlier high yielding varieties.-----> why is this wrong
why is the "requirements for application of A and application of B - of C" wrong construction? there is no ambiguity and no verb tense issue either
option C clearly states that irrigation and application of fertilizer are no more expensive requirements to the present varieties
why is option C wrong? please comment
generis, daagh, EMPOWERgmatVerbal, GMATNinja, DmitryFarber.
AjiteshArun
Expert
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 08 Sep 2026
Posts: 6,153
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert reply
sampriya
Hi sampriya,
Here is one way to take C out. Have a look option E:
the X and Y that were required by earlier varieties
This quite clearly tells us that earlier varieties required both X (costly irrigation) and Y (application of commercial fertilizer). Option C, on the other hand, leads to:
application of fertilizer and irrigation of earlier varieties
There is no to after fertilizer, so we don't have any connection between application and earlier varieties. That is, we end up with
application of fertilizer and irrigation of earlier varieties
instead of
application of fertilizer to and irrigation of earlier varieties
_________________
Free Comprehensive CR Course: youtube.com/@DelvAcademy/playlists
jayarora
Current Student
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Last visit: 26 Apr 2025
Posts: 158
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
Schools: Harvard '24 (A)
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V44 (Online)
GPA: 3.61
Products:
shoonya
Choice A: Requirements were not costly. If we read literally, it sounds as if application of fertilizers was done by the high yielding varieties (HYV) themselves.
Choice B: Requirements were not costly. Application of irrigation does not make sense. One can apply fertilizer. One cannot apply irrigation.
Choice C: Requirements were not costly. 'Requirements for' seems as if the requirements were gathered to present them to the HYV. Again, Application of irrigation does not make sense.
Choice D: Again, Application of irrigation does not make sense. 'Was' does not make sense with the compound subject.
Choice E: Fixes all the problems.
Schools: ESADE '23 (A)
Posts: 23
Please explain option e. New varieties show promise of high yield without A and B those were required by old varieties.
That can refer to compound subject?
That can refer to compound subject?
saro
Check out this post and then let us know if you still have questions!
_________________
GMAT/GRE/EA tutors @ www.gmatninja.com | YouTube | Articles | IG
Beginners' Guides: RC | CR | Complete Resource Compilations: RC | CR
YouTube LIVE webinars: all videos by topic + 24-hour marathon for Ukraine
Question Explanation Collections: RC | CR | SC
Beginners' Guides: RC | CR | Complete Resource Compilations: RC | CR
YouTube LIVE webinars: all videos by topic + 24-hour marathon for Ukraine
Question Explanation Collections: RC | CR | SC
Moderators:
Announcements
Tuck at Dartmouth
AI at Dartmouth Tuck: How the School Is Preparing Leaders for the Age of Artificial Intelligence
Inside the courses, research, and hands-on learning defining wise, decisive leadership in an AI-driven world.
Read More
Inside the courses, research, and hands-on learning defining wise, decisive leadership in an AI-driven world.
Read More
Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos
Success stories and strategies from high-scoring candidates.