The INES scale was created in 1990 as a way of indicating the relative seriousness of incidents in which radioactivity is released at nuclear plants. Before that, various countries relied upon their own classification systems, making it difficult to compare a nuclear mishap that occurred in the U.S. with one in, say, Europe or Japan.
Which of the following statements is best supported by the above passage?
A.After 1990, the implementation of the INES scale is expected to have led to a reduction in the amount of damage caused by nuclear mishaps.
B. To compare the relative seriousness of incidents across nations, incidents in which radio-activity is released, a common scale of measurement is likely better than different scales of measurements.
C. The ability to compare the relative seriousness of incidents in which radioactivity is released at nuclear plants in different parts of the US is expected to have increased after the creation of INES in 1990.
D.It is very likely that most countries currently use the INES scale to communicate the relative seriousness of incidents in which radioactivity is released at nuclear plants.
E. In the absence of the INES scale, it would have been currently very difficult to compare nuclear mishaps in the US with those in Europe or Japan.
Explanation:
A-Out of scope
B-logically correct choice.... as it lucidly states that making a common scale is expectly helpful in comparing relative seriousness of incidents across nations.
C,D- timeline till 1900 only is given in passage
E- may be equally true & false...what if after some new, better measurement scale was introduced.
Hence B is the correct answer.
Reward kudos if you like the explanation.?
Regards,
Atul Pandey
Posted from my mobile device