Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 04:10 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 04:10
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
patto
Joined: 22 Jun 2017
Last visit: 09 Jul 2021
Posts: 236
Own Kudos:
864
 [10]
Given Kudos: 149
Location: Argentina
GMAT 1: 630 Q43 V34
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36 (Online)
Products:
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36 (Online)
Posts: 236
Kudos: 864
 [10]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
fitzpratik
Joined: 17 Oct 2016
Last visit: 08 Mar 2021
Posts: 224
Own Kudos:
496
 [1]
Given Kudos: 49
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Healthcare
GPA: 3.05
WE:Pharmaceuticals (Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals)
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
nurba92
Joined: 17 Jan 2016
Last visit: 06 Oct 2022
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 144
Status:As cheeks from my insta feed say: soon...
Products:
Posts: 66
Kudos: 22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Arro44
Joined: 04 Jun 2018
Last visit: 14 Aug 2022
Posts: 658
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 362
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 730 Q47 V44
GPA: 3.4
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q47 V44
Posts: 658
Kudos: 752
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If the statement in answer choice A were to be correct, a certain location on earth would have had a "reducing" atmosphere.
This would then have enabled the formation of amino acids by lighting strikes.

I think the PoE comes in quite handy for solving this question.
User avatar
Osqui800
Joined: 07 Dec 2020
Last visit: 26 May 2022
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
5
 [1]
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 8
Kudos: 5
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nurba92
patto
In an experiment designed to show how life may have begun on Earth, scientists demonstrated that an electrical spark-or lightning-could produce amino acids, the building blocks of Earth's life. However, unless the spark occurs in a "reducing" atmosphere, that is, one rich in hydrogen and lean in oxygen, amino acids do not form readily and tend to break apart when they do form. Scientists now believe that Earth's atmosphere was actually rich in oxygen and lean in nitrogen at the time life began.

Assuming that the scientists' current belief about Earth's atmosphere at the time life began is correct, which one of the following, if true, would most help to explain how lightning could have produced the first amino acids on Earth?


(A) Meteorite impacts at the time life began on Earth temporarily created a reducing atmosphere around the impact site.

(B) A single amino acid could have been sufficient to begin the formation of life on Earth.

(C) Earth's atmosphere has changed significantly since life first began.

(D) Lightning was less common on Earth at the time life began than it is now.

(E) Asteroids contain amino acids, and some of these amino acids could survive an asteroid's impact with Earth.

I think E is wrong because the time of asteroid's impact with Earth is not specified
Am I thinking right?

Exactly, the question stem is pretty clear: how lightning could have produced the first amino acids on Earth?
User avatar
UkrHurricane
Joined: 04 Dec 2017
Last visit: 09 Feb 2026
Posts: 54
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 429
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Finance, Human Resources
Schools: Simon '27
GMAT 1: 580 Q38 V32
GMAT 2: 590 Q49 V23
GMAT 3: 580 Q43 V27
GMAT 4: 630 Q45 V31 (Online)
GMAT 5: 670 Q47 V35 (Online)
GPA: 3.4
Schools: Simon '27
GMAT 5: 670 Q47 V35 (Online)
Posts: 54
Kudos: 62
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nurba92
patto
In an experiment designed to show how life may have begun on Earth, scientists demonstrated that an electrical spark-or lightning-could produce amino acids, the building blocks of Earth's life. However, unless the spark occurs in a "reducing" atmosphere, that is, one rich in hydrogen and lean in oxygen, amino acids do not form readily and tend to break apart when they do form. Scientists now believe that Earth's atmosphere was actually rich in oxygen and lean in nitrogen at the time life began.

Assuming that the scientists' current belief about Earth's atmosphere at the time life began is correct, which one of the following, if true, would most help to explain how lightning could have produced the first amino acids on Earth?


(A) Meteorite impacts at the time life began on Earth temporarily created a reducing atmosphere around the impact site.

(B) A single amino acid could have been sufficient to begin the formation of life on Earth.

(C) Earth's atmosphere has changed significantly since life first began.

(D) Lightning was less common on Earth at the time life began than it is now.

(E) Asteroids contain amino acids, and some of these amino acids could survive an asteroid's impact with Earth.

I think E is wrong because the time of asteroid's impact with Earth is not specified
Am I thinking right?

I think, E is incorrect also because according to the premise (unless the spark occurs in an atmosphere rich in hydrogen and lean in oxygen, amino acids tend to break apart when they do form), even if amino acids come from asteroids, they would break apart.
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,706
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,706
Kudos: 2,329
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
UkrHurricane
nurba92
patto
In an experiment designed to show how life may have begun on Earth, scientists demonstrated that an electrical spark-or lightning-could produce amino acids, the building blocks of Earth's life. However, unless the spark occurs in a "reducing" atmosphere, that is, one rich in hydrogen and lean in oxygen, amino acids do not form readily and tend to break apart when they do form. Scientists now believe that Earth's atmosphere was actually rich in oxygen and lean in nitrogen at the time life began.

Assuming that the scientists' current belief about Earth's atmosphere at the time life began is correct, which one of the following, if true, would most help to explain how lightning could have produced the first amino acids on Earth?


(A) Meteorite impacts at the time life began on Earth temporarily created a reducing atmosphere around the impact site.

(B) A single amino acid could have been sufficient to begin the formation of life on Earth.

(C) Earth's atmosphere has changed significantly since life first began.

(D) Lightning was less common on Earth at the time life began than it is now.

(E) Asteroids contain amino acids, and some of these amino acids could survive an asteroid's impact with Earth.

I think E is wrong because the time of asteroid's impact with Earth is not specified
Am I thinking right?

I think, E is incorrect also because according to the premise (unless the spark occurs in an atmosphere rich in hydrogen and lean in oxygen, amino acids tend to break apart when they do form), even if amino acids come from asteroids, they would break apart.
UkrHurricane Refer only the black text of the passage. The rest doesn't matter.
Following might help why E is wrong for one more reason.

(A) Meteorite impacts at the time life began on Earth temporarily created a reducing atmosphere around the impact site. - Not the best of choice we are looking for but the best among the lot. I say because it uses the word 'temporarily' which creates doubt in the way that amino acids formed in the might not have had enough time to survive. However, retrospectively, the doubt seems to be an overkilling thought.

(B) A single amino acid could have been sufficient to begin the formation of life on Earth. - It can be true but it doesn't help explain how lightning could have produced the first amino acids on Earth. This might be a necessary condition but we are more interested in knowing the preconditions as mentioned in the passage and how lightning worked.

(C) Earth's atmosphere has changed significantly since life first began. - Yes, true but what about lightning. Can be eliminated in a similar way as we did B.

(D) Lightning was less common on Earth at the time life began than it is now. - If at all this is exactly the opposite of what we are looking for. Its a weakener. See the question stem - we need a strengthener.

(E) Asteroids contain amino acids, and some of these amino acids could survive an asteroid's impact with Earth. - A weakener again. If amino acids from asteroids survived then lightning, possibly, didn't play its role in life evolution(production of first amino acids). This option gives another reason for production of amino acids, undermining lightning's role.
User avatar
Crytiocanalyst
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Last visit: 27 May 2023
Posts: 942
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 309
Posts: 942
Kudos: 214
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) Meteorite impacts at the time life began on Earth temporarily created a reducing atmosphere around the impact site.
This helps us to understand as of how the reduction atmosphere was created , leading to the creation of the amino acids

(B) A single amino acid could have been sufficient to begin the formation of life on Earth.
This still doesn't answer the question as of how the first amino acid was created

(C) Earth's atmosphere has changed significantly since life first began.
The scientists has clearly determined the prestate even if the state has changed significantly it doesn't help us figure out how the reduction state was reached

(D) Lightning was less common on Earth at the time life began than it is now.
Similar reasoning as C

(E) Asteroids contain amino acids, and some of these amino acids could survive an asteroid's impact with Earth.
This out of context we are only intrested as of how the environment affected the creation of the amino acid other than extratressial assit

Hence IMO A
avatar
robotman88
Joined: 28 May 2021
Last visit: 08 May 2025
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Location: India
Posts: 16
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO [A] because that is literally the only option that explains why lightning could have been the cause for the first amino acids.
User avatar
sssanskaar
Joined: 09 Aug 2020
Last visit: 09 Oct 2022
Posts: 210
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 163
Location: India
Schools: IIMA PGPX'23
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39 (Online)
Schools: IIMA PGPX'23
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39 (Online)
Posts: 210
Kudos: 132
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Straightaway between options A and E. E goes out of scope to say that amino acids came from outside of our planet, something which does not resolve the paradox presented in the argument.

Option A is the clear winner. :)
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,431
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,431
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
504 posts
358 posts