Which of the following statements, if true, would most strengthen the argument of the advocates of “Stop Drugs Now” that the program should be expanded statewide?
A. School programs are far less important than parental messages in influencing a teenager’s decision to use drugs. (irrelevant)
B. Drug use among teens in the five counties where the “Stop Drugs Now” program was piloted has been dropping steadily for over a decade. (this weakens the statement, as if the rate of drug use was already dropping then the "Stop Drugs Now" program is not needed in the first place, let alone the program being expanded to cover all of California).
C. Teenagers at the public schools where the “Stop Drugs Now” program was piloted reported higher average levels of drug use than did teenagers at private schools in the same counties where the program was not piloted. (Opposite Effect).
D. There is evidence that teenagers who start smoking at an early age are more likely to experiment with illegal drugs than teenagers who do not smoke. (Irrelevant to the argument and the question stem).
E. The percentage of teenagers who reported using drugs at the schools where the “Stop Drugs Now” program was piloted dropped more in the last year than in any other year over the last decade. (this is the OA as the program helped reduce drug usage after it was introduced.)
The OA is E