Excuse me, but I don't think this question is properly designed.
Statement 1, is
"1) Units’ digit of (P^4k+2)−Q is equal to 7, where k is a positive integer."
If P and Q are prime numbers less than 70, they both have to be positive, and one of them has to be equal to 2. You can derive from Statement 1, if the result is odd having a 7 as a units digit, either P or Q is even. And, if P and Q are prime, either of them can be number 2.
If you plug in the 2 in that expression, :
a. If Q is 2, Then P must be 3 to the power of 2., and yields k equal to zero, which CAN NOT be, since k is positive according to St1. So Q can never be number 2.
b. Hence, P is equal to 2. If you plug in the 2 as P in the expression, you can subtract a prime number Q, from any number ending in 4 in the units digit place (64,1024, etc), which leaves Q as being possibly 7,17,37, 47 or 67. In either case, u are able to answer the main question, "What is the units digit of P*Q?",
so it's sufficient A. The units digit of P*Q is 4., since P=2, and Q ends in 7, no matter the other digits in it.
If you analyze separately St2, "Units digit of the expression [Q(P+1)] is a perfect cube", it's insufficient. At this moment, you this should be over, but If you analyze it in light of St1, you arrive to: Q(P+1)=Q*3=XXX8, which means Q can be either 6,16, 26, but you know it ends with 6, and since P is 2, you know The units digit of P*Q is 2, which contradicts info gathered from St1.
Both Statements should always share TRUE information, no matter if it's sufficient or not.
This is just mind blowing for me. I 've read that the GMAT statements ARE ALWAYS TRUE, and in this question they do not complement each other.