Hey there everybody!
I have been super fortunate and been admitted to 2 amazing schools, UCLA Anderson and Berkeley Haas, both for the FTMBA programs. They have given me a generous full scholarship at the former and a partial scholarship at the latter.
I am struggling to make a decision... It's a wonderful struggle to have, but it is nonetheless a struggle! Here's my quick bio:
- Italian working in my family business in Italy, not certain about when I will return (right after MBA, a couple years after, further down the line).
- I am not overly concerned about traditional recruiting, I am not looking to follow a consulting or IB path. I want to either start my own thing, collaborate with others in starting something, work in a small and growing project, and/or expand my family's operations into different sectors and geographies.
- Location-wise, if I were to stay some time in the US after my MBA, California would be my number 1 choice; preferring the LA area over the Bay Area, but happy in both.
My image of the schools (with many "?" included

) is:
Anderson:
- Overall it could be a more enriching experience, being in a bustling city such as LA. Experiential learning opportunities seem more abundant?
- There appears to be a more diverse (backgrounds, career paths, personality types) mix of students? People seem to be super smart, but perhaps not as intellectually "bright" (Haas is simply outstanding at this) but maybe more...interesting?
- Also, people maybe are more fun? I feel as though the social scene at Haas is more quiet and quirky (not criticizing, just perhaps not what I would like most for my experience)
- Career paths may be broader (vs Tech and Silicon Valley) and more people without a clear defined path (explorers)
- Much better weather, dating scene (not decisive factors, but they do make the experience nicer) + LA with an extra $70k...
Haas:
- Much stronger brand, specially internationally (UC Berkeley is extremely well known around here, UCLA not so much). Even if I am not looking to work at a large firm, the brand accompanies you your whole life and will come handy in many occasions.
- I think there are more Haasies around Europe than Andersons.
- Peers will most likely be intellectually brighter.
- Probably more people going into starting their own ventures, better access to interning / joining ft start-ups.
- Quality of the academics will probably be incredibly good, more so than at Anderson.
- I don't want the opinion of others be determining for me, but just about everyone sees Haas as an obvious - not even close - choice vs Anderson.
- People seem to be less of the "let's go to a bar and have a few beers" type and more of the hiking and bbq type (not saying I want the full-on alcohol fused MBA experience, but I do enjoy bars and I want to be out and about meeting people - incl. non-MBAs)
- Politics seem to be a big thing there (I really dislike and avoid all things politics).
- Berkeley itself seems to be somewhat a boring town? (Surprised, considering there's around 40k students attending the university) And Haasies don't go to SF that much (according to the ones I've spoken to).
TL;DR: I feel Anderson might be more fun, the people more interesting on a personal level, and the access to the outside community easier and better. Haas enjoys an undoubtedly stronger name (and selectivity) and that will surely reflect a stronger program and more intellectually bright peers, and that brand is something I'll carry my whole life.
I seem to have created an image of the type of people at each school that I don't know if it's accurate. I think fit is the #1 factor for me to decide a school, so I would immensely appreciate any input you can provide here.

Thanks a lot GMAT Clubbers!