I saw this question pop up today when I was studying my
MGMAT book. In a recent post by
mikemcgarry he encouraged me to not dismiss things and to look deeper to really ensure you understand the mechanics of the problem/question rather than just a surface understanding (something about icebergs comes to mind).
I see in the explanation here (and in the
MGMAT book) that we are able to infer that \(4^y\) = \(2^2^y\). I'm certainly not going to argue that this is true as I have tested the theory with a few different numbers, and the rest of the problem makes sense to me. Rather than just dismiss this I would like to grasp the mechanics of why we are able to do this. I hope that if I understand this better I will be able to recognise this more easily in the future and in what cases I can and more importantly cannot make this inferance.
Thanks in advance for the help.
p.s. I know this is probably a very simple question for most of you around here but I guess we all get caught up on simple things from time to time