SUmmary :
1.PL ..how it is formed!!
2. A disagreement over the shape of PL
POVs for shape of PL
3. Author's take : controversy based on UNWARRANTED extrapolation of bla bla
Supporting his view as to why such thinking existed
Giving his take on what is necessary for conclusive decision
Main point : The controversy over te hape of PL is based on unwarranted extraps and what is necessary to resolve such disagreement !!
Primary purpsoe : evaluating the source of controversy (why the controversy existed)
Which of the following is a fact presented in the passage?
Approach : POE
(A) The
shape of the connections between the separate, sacklike masses in pillow lava is unknown.
- no idea about sahpe of "connections"
(B) More accurate cross sections of pillow lava would reveal the mode of origin.
- Keep
(C) Water or ice is necessary for the formation of pillow lava.
- leep
(D) No three-dimensional examples of intact pillows currently exist.
- AItor says " adeqaute number of images are needed "..adequate does not mean no images at all
(E) The
origin of pillow lava is not yet known.
- actually we know ..how PL are formed ..so their origins have to be from the VOLCANO rigt??
B vs C
B says "more accurate cross sections " would reveal...we do not know this for sure..AUthor says adequate 3D intact pillow images are essential...but he does not say anything aboyt "MORE ACCUARATE corss sectiosn"
C - POE
mikemcgarry DmitryFarber TommyWallach ScottTargetTestPrep chetan2u generisplease provode your reasoning for OPTION C... the passsage does not say anything that the ONLY WAY FOR PLs to form is cooling from WATER... i mean there can be other ways right??/ then how can we safely state that water is in FACT needed for PL's to form...??
How can we be sure about that???