bb
I admit that I just glanced and did not read every word of the article this morning but how do you know that Wharton actually knew? (is there a reference in the article)? Are you saying they actually reviewed this in the applicant consideration and said "we are OK?" or possibly that it was not disclosed to them and did not show up on background check ins it was allegedly... but not proven or indited.
1) He was named in a major news publication. If Wharton didn't find out in the application/background check process, that's negligence.
2) Yes, it is alleged and he wasn't indicted, but if the WSJ felt confident enough in the source to publish it, then there's sure as hell something there. Would you hire someone who had similar allegations published about them in the news?
At the end of the day, you're right that we don't know what Wharton knew. We can only judge based on results and this is pretty bad. As a Wharton student myself, I'm personally embarassed that we're associated with this clown.