Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 17:44 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 17:44
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bismuth83
User avatar
DI Forum Moderator
Joined: 15 Sep 2024
Last visit: 01 Aug 2025
Posts: 719
Own Kudos:
2,605
 [3]
Given Kudos: 441
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 719
Kudos: 2,605
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Madhvendrasinh
Joined: 01 Feb 2024
Last visit: 26 Feb 2025
Posts: 110
Own Kudos:
62
 [5]
Given Kudos: 200
Posts: 110
Kudos: 62
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Bismuth83
User avatar
DI Forum Moderator
Joined: 15 Sep 2024
Last visit: 01 Aug 2025
Posts: 719
Own Kudos:
2,605
 [2]
Given Kudos: 441
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 719
Kudos: 2,605
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bismuth83
User avatar
DI Forum Moderator
Joined: 15 Sep 2024
Last visit: 01 Aug 2025
Posts: 719
Own Kudos:
2,605
 [1]
Given Kudos: 441
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 719
Kudos: 2,605
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Question 1.

1. We are asked to check which statements can be supported by using information given.

2. It is illegal to build on the site of a former gas station. Email #2 discusses about the possibility that a gas station was once built there, however, there is no mention that it's illegal to build on the site. So, this statement isn't supported by the text.

3. Testing for chemicals in the soil has caused delays in the construction schedule. Email #1 asks about the reason construction is delayed and Email #2 explains this by saying that testing for chemicals needs to be done. So, this statement is supported by the text.

4. Soil samples from the construction site showed significant levels of carcinogenic chemicals. None of the emails give information about the results of testing. So, this statement isn't supported by the text.

Question 2.

1. Here, it is also asked to figure out which statement can be supported by using the information given.

2. Construction cannot begin on the site because the company cannot prove that there was no gas station on that property. Email #2 discusses that only soil tests are necessary, which means that even if the company can't prove that there was no gas station, a good soil test would still allow construction. So, this statement isn't supported by the text.

3. The majority of soil samples taken from the site are clean, but the EPA insists that all samples must be free of chemicals. Once again, there is no information given about the results of the testing. So, this statement isn't supported by the text.
User avatar
dejavu3363
Joined: 19 Mar 2025
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 28
GMAT Focus 1: 725 Q90 V82 DI86
GMAT Focus 1: 725 Q90 V82 DI86
Posts: 25
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
in statement2 of q1, shouldn't it be "soil, water and air" for making it true? Alone soil tests wont help much in minimizing delays.. Thoughts?
User avatar
samarpan.g28
Joined: 08 Dec 2023
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 324
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,236
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Human Resources
GPA: 8.88
WE:Engineering (Technology)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It is taken from Email #3 "How is the determination about chemicals in the soil done? Are they taking one sample or samples from several locations on the site? If it’s one sample, what are acceptable levels, and do we have an appeal if the finding is unacceptable? If they’re taking multiple samples, must all samples meet the standard? Are the values averaged? What if only one is above the line?"

As mentioned in the inference, only 'soil test' is fine. But the EPA has not given the sign-off yet, so this inference is incorrect, and hence the answer is No.
dejavu3363
in statement2 of q1, shouldn't it be "soil, water and air" for making it true? Alone soil tests wont help much in minimizing delays.. Thoughts?
avatar
HarshG7
Joined: 08 Jul 2025
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 112
Posts: 22
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
for Question 2 Statement 1 "Construction cannot begin on the site because the company cannot prove that there was no gas station on that property" can we not make a direct inference about this being true as Email 2 i.e. E-mail from Project Manager to District Manager states the fact "Unfortunately, there is now a claim that the site was a gas station, with in-ground tanks, prior to construction of the building that housed the cleaners. We dispute this contention", stating that they dispute this contention, can it not mean that indirectly the said question statement stands true ?
User avatar
SwethaReddyL
Joined: 28 Nov 2023
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 60
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 264
Location: India
Posts: 60
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
+1, could one of you please take this Bunuel / bb / chetan2u

Thanks in advance,
Swetha
HarshG7
for Question 2 Statement 1 "Construction cannot begin on the site because the company cannot prove that there was no gas station on that property" can we not make a direct inference about this being true as Email 2 i.e. E-mail from Project Manager to District Manager states the fact "Unfortunately, there is now a claim that the site was a gas station, with in-ground tanks, prior to construction of the building that housed the cleaners. We dispute this contention", stating that they dispute this contention, can it not mean that indirectly the said question statement stands true ?
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 11,238
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,238
Kudos: 43,696
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
SwethaReddyL
+1, could one of you please take this Bunuel / bb / chetan2u

Thanks in advance,
Swetha

Hi
The email #2 states :-
1. Construction could not start earlier as tests for soil were pending given the land was used by cleaners. (However, we can also say that these tests are still pending as per the mail)
2. Before the above tests could be done, another claim of the land being used as a gas station has cropped up. The company disputes that but is ready for additional tests.
3. The construction has not started because of the pending tests. Even if they would have proved that there was no gas station, the pending tests mentioned at point 1 above would not allow immediate start.

Thus, the construction is not pending because the company could not prove ABC but because the tests are pending.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105355 posts
496 posts