GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 23 Sep 2018, 09:17

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

With American cryptanalysts breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese I

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

SVP
SVP
User avatar
V
Status: Preparing for the GMAT
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 1672
Location: Pakistan
GPA: 3.39
Premium Member CAT Tests
With American cryptanalysts breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese I  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Feb 2017, 05:24
4
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

76% (00:53) correct 24% (00:59) wrong based on 205 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

With American cryptanalysts breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet losing the strategic element of surprise at Midway, which allowed the American Fleet to ambush the Japanese and win a decisive victory.

A. With American cryptanalysts breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet losing the strategic element of surprise at Midway, which allowed
B. With American cryptanalysts breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet strategically lost the element of surprise at Midway, and this allowed
C. Because of the American cryptanalysts breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet strategically lost the element of surprise at Midway, to allow
D. Because American cryptanalysts had broken the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet lost the strategic element of surprise at Midway, allowing
E. Since American cryptanalysts broke the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet strategically lost the element of surprise at Midway, and this allowed

_________________

Official PS Practice Questions
Press +1 Kudos if this post is helpful

SC Moderator
User avatar
D
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1703
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
GPA: 4
WE: Analyst (Retail)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
With American cryptanalysts breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese I  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Feb 2017, 09:05
1
A. With American cryptanalysts breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet losing the strategic element of surprise at Midway, which allowed - Incorrect. Missing verb error.

B. With American cryptanalysts breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet strategically lost the element of surprise at Midway, and this allowed - Incorrect. Illogical and usage of 'this' is incorrect in the given context.

C. Because of the American cryptanalysts breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet strategically lost the element of surprise at Midway, to allow - Incorrect. Illogical.

D. Because American cryptanalysts had broken the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet lost the strategic element of surprise at Midway, allowing - Correct.

E. Since American cryptanalysts broke the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet strategically lost the element of surprise at Midway, and this allowed - Incorrect. Tense error and usage of 'this' is incorrect.

Answer: D
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 17 Feb 2014
Posts: 102
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
GMAT 2: 740 Q48 V42
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
With American cryptanalysts breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese I  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Feb 2017, 09:17
3
With American cryptanalysts breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet losing the strategic element of surprise at Midway, which allowed the American Fleet to ambush the Japanese and win a decisive victory.

Issues: Modifier | Verb Tense

Analysis:
1) Sequence of events in sentence: code had been broken => Japanese lost element of surprise => allowing American to ambush Japanese
2) Hence, the correct verb for "Americans break code" should be "past perfect" since that event happen before "Japanese lost element of surprise" and is also the the cause of it.
3) "which allowed" as used in original sentence is incorrect as "which" is never used to refer to the whole clause. ", verb-ing" is a form we need to use here to refer to the whole clause.


I have highlighted the issues in options below:

A. With American cryptanalysts breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet losing the strategic element of surprise at Midway, which allowed
- "which" used incorrectly
- "breaking" and "loosing" seems to indicate that those things were happening simultaneously which has meaning issue
- ", the Japanese Imperial Feet..." is a run on clause without any conjunction

(Any of the above error alone is enough to eliminate this option)

B. With American cryptanalysts breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet strategically lost the element of surprise at Midway, and this allowed
- Pronoun ambiguity
(Also less favorable option than (D))

C. Because of the American cryptanalysts breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet strategically lost the element of surprise at Midway, to allow
- Modifier error (leading to sentence fragment)

D. Because American cryptanalysts had broken the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet lost the strategic element of surprise at Midway, allowing

E. Since American cryptanalysts broke the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet strategically lost the element of surprise at Midway, and this allowed

- Verb tense issue
- Pronoun ambiguity


Answer: (D)
SVP
SVP
User avatar
D
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Posts: 1808
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
With American cryptanalysists breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 05 Aug 2017, 21:48
With American cryptanalysists breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet losing the strategic element of surprise at Midway, which allowed the America Fleet to ambush the Japanese and win a decisive victory.

(A) With American cryptanalysists breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet losing the strategic element of surprise at Midway, which allowed

(B) With American cryptanalysists breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet strategically lost the element of surprise at Midway, and this allowed

(C) Because of the American cryptanalysists breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet strategically lost the element of surprise at Midway, to allow

(D) Because American cryptanalysists had broken the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet lost the strategic element of surprise at Midway, allowing

(E) Since American cryptanalysists broke the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet strategically lost the element of surprise at Midway, and this allowed

Originally posted by Mo2men on 05 Aug 2017, 15:19.
Last edited by broall on 05 Aug 2017, 21:48, edited 1 time in total.
Merged topic. Please search before posting question.
GMAT Tutor
avatar
S
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1344
Re: With American cryptanalysists breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Aug 2017, 15:36
If you look at how "strategic" and "strategically" are used in the various answer choices, you can pick the correct answer here. If you say someone "strategically lost", that means losing was a strategy that person was using. So you might say a pool hustler "strategically lost her first game to make other players think she was worse at pool than she truly was". That's something someone might do as a strategy to gain a larger advantage later on. But here, Japan did not "strategically lose the element of surprise"; that wasn't a tactical choice on their part. Instead they lost the "strategic element of surprise". This correctly conveys the meaning that the "element of surprise" is what is strategic in this sentence.

Answers A and D are the only answers that use "strategic" correctly, but answer A is not a sentence (there is no main clause), so D must be right.

And the question should say 'cryptanalyst', not 'cryptanalysist' (that's not a word!).
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1789
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: With American cryptanalysts breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese I  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jan 2018, 07:36
"lost strategically" and strategic element have 2 different meanings.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 25 Dec 2014
Posts: 5
Location: United States
Re: With American cryptanalysts breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese I  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jun 2018, 21:43
Quote:
D. Because American cryptanalysts had broken the Japanese code, the Japanese Imperial Fleet lost the strategic element of surprise at Midway, allowing


Based on the post by e-gmat on VERB-ING MODIFIERS:
Quote:
verb-ing modifiers are made from “verbs” and they denote action. Now, any action needs a doer. In the same way, the verb-ing modifiers also associated with the subjects of the preceding clause. What we must keep in mind is that the action denoted by verb-ing must make sense with the subject of the clause. The use of verb-ing is correct only if it makes sense with the subject of the clause it is modifying.


From what I understand, this means that in option D, the Japanese Imperial Fleet should be the doer of the action allowing. However, it is the loosing of the surprise that "allowed" American Fleet to ambush. Am I missing something here?

Thanks in advance.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4543
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: With American cryptanalysts breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese I  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jul 2018, 12:44
Top Contributor
@Thoma


The critical point is that of the Japanese army's losing the element of surprise that allowed the US to outsmart the Japanese. The citing of the Japanese is meant to clarify whose loss it was. When it is somebody's loss, it is not logical to conclude the loser himself caused his loss deliberately. In a do or die war, why would the Japanese army
want to lose its secrecy code and pave the way for a US victory?
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

GMAT Club Bot
Re: With American cryptanalysts breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese I &nbs [#permalink] 29 Jul 2018, 12:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by

With American cryptanalysts breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese I

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.