Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 11:20 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 11:20
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
shasadou
Joined: 12 Aug 2015
Last visit: 24 Nov 2022
Posts: 219
Own Kudos:
3,099
 [53]
Given Kudos: 1,476
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 640 Q40 V37
GMAT 2: 650 Q43 V36
GMAT 3: 600 Q47 V27
GPA: 3.3
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
GMAT 3: 600 Q47 V27
Posts: 219
Kudos: 3,099
 [53]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
48
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,419
 [6]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,419
 [6]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
shasadou
Joined: 12 Aug 2015
Last visit: 24 Nov 2022
Posts: 219
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,476
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 640 Q40 V37
GMAT 2: 650 Q43 V36
GMAT 3: 600 Q47 V27
GPA: 3.3
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
GMAT 3: 600 Q47 V27
Posts: 219
Kudos: 3,099
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh
A. individual human beings often ignore or underestimate the gravity of more nebulous threats, such as climate change, yet are no less menacing --- yet are no less menacing refers to individual human beings; not to the gravity of the nebulous threats; also it may be noted that if gravity was underestimated, the verb for the same should be in singular ‘is’ and not in plural ‘are’

B. individual human beings are prone to ignore, or else to underestimate, the gravity of more nebulous yet no less menacing threats, such as climate change -- seems to be the correct choice, except for the inclusion of the word 'else'. But that is not an unacceptable

C. individual human beings, often ignoring or underestimating the gravity of more nebulous threats, such as climate change, are no less menacing -- change in meaning; it is the threats that are no less menacing and not individuals
D. the gravity of threats, such as climate change, that are more nebulous yet no less menacing are often ignored, or else underestimated, by individual human beings --- The gravity of threats has no brains; misplaced modification
E. the gravity of more nebulous threats, such as climate change, are no less menacing, yet are often ignored or underestimated by individual human beings ---same as in D.
daagh,
the original meaning of 'yet are no less menacing' is that humans are no less menacing and C stands gramatically perfect but y is C mentioned as change in meaning?
Can you please clarify where I am going wrong?
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,393
Own Kudos:
15,523
 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,393
Kudos: 15,523
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Alok322
daagh
A. individual human beings often ignore or underestimate the gravity of more nebulous threats, such as climate change, yet are no less menacing --- yet are no less menacing refers to individual human beings; not to the gravity of the nebulous threats; also it may be noted that if gravity was underestimated, the verb for the same should be in singular ‘is’ and not in plural ‘are’

B. individual human beings are prone to ignore, or else to underestimate, the gravity of more nebulous yet no less menacing threats, such as climate change -- seems to be the correct choice, except for the inclusion of the word 'else'. But that is not an unacceptable

C. individual human beings, often ignoring or underestimating the gravity of more nebulous threats, such as climate change, are no less menacing -- change in meaning; it is the threats that are no less menacing and not individuals
D. the gravity of threats, such as climate change, that are more nebulous yet no less menacing are often ignored, or else underestimated, by individual human beings --- The gravity of threats has no brains; misplaced modification
E. the gravity of more nebulous threats, such as climate change, are no less menacing, yet are often ignored or underestimated by individual human beings ---same as in D.
daagh,
the original meaning of 'yet are no less menacing' is that humans are no less menacing and C stands gramatically perfect but y is C mentioned as change in meaning?
Can you please clarify where I am going wrong?

The structure of the sentence in option C is :

With brains shaped by evolution to respond primarily to immediate physical peril, individual human beings ,often ignoring or underestimating the gravity of more nebulous threats, such as climate change, are no less menacing.

The pink highlighted modifier is a prepositional phrase modifier for the subject individual human beings and the green highlighted part is a present participial modifier again for the subject individual human beings. The main verb of the sentence is are.

Once you cut down the fluff, the sentence reduces to:

Individual human beings are no less menacing.

You would now understand the above is not the intended meaning - the original meaning is more nebulous threats (such as climate change) are no less menacing.
User avatar
Avinash_R1
Joined: 03 Jul 2016
Last visit: 31 Jan 2019
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Posts: 21
Kudos: 22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sayantanc2k
Alok322
daagh
A. individual human beings often ignore or underestimate the gravity of more nebulous threats, such as climate change, yet are no less menacing --- yet are no less menacing refers to individual human beings; not to the gravity of the nebulous threats; also it may be noted that if gravity was underestimated, the verb for the same should be in singular ‘is’ and not in plural ‘are’

B. individual human beings are prone to ignore, or else to underestimate, the gravity of more nebulous yet no less menacing threats, such as climate change -- seems to be the correct choice, except for the inclusion of the word 'else'. But that is not an unacceptable

C. individual human beings, often ignoring or underestimating the gravity of more nebulous threats, such as climate change, are no less menacing -- change in meaning; it is the threats that are no less menacing and not individuals
D. the gravity of threats, such as climate change, that are more nebulous yet no less menacing are often ignored, or else underestimated, by individual human beings --- The gravity of threats has no brains; misplaced modification
E. the gravity of more nebulous threats, such as climate change, are no less menacing, yet are often ignored or underestimated by individual human beings ---same as in D.
daagh,
the original meaning of 'yet are no less menacing' is that humans are no less menacing and C stands gramatically perfect but y is C mentioned as change in meaning?
Can you please clarify where I am going wrong?

The structure of the sentence in option C is :

With brains shaped by evolution to respond primarily to immediate physical peril, individual human beings ,often ignoring or underestimating the gravity of more nebulous threats, such as climate change, are no less menacing.

The pink highlighted modifier is a prepositional phrase modifier for the subject individual human beings and the green highlighted part is a present participial modifier again for the subject individual human beings. The main verb of the sentence is are.

Once you cut down the fluff, the sentence reduces to:

Individual human beings are no less menacing.

You would now understand the above is not the intended meaning - the original meaning is more nebulous threats (such as climate change) are no less menacing.

can you please explain why A is wrong? [The core structure of this sentence is individual human beings often ignore or underestimate … yet are no less menacing. According to the first portion of the sentence, the human beings are responding to threats; they are not themselves the threats.]
User avatar
arvind910619
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 845
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 755
Status:Learning
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
Posts: 845
Kudos: 607
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shasadou
With brains shaped by evolution to respond primarily to immediate physical peril, individual human beings often ignore or underestimate the gravity of more nebulous threats, such as climate change, yet are no less menacing.

A. individual human beings often ignore or underestimate the gravity of more nebulous threats, such as climate change, yet are no less menacing
B. individual human beings are prone to ignore, or else to underestimate, the gravity of more nebulous yet no less menacing threats, such as climate change
C. individual human beings, often ignoring or underestimating the gravity of more nebulous threats, such as climate change, are no less menacing
D. the gravity of threats, such as climate change, that are more nebulous yet no less menacing are often ignored, or else underestimated, by individual human beings
E. the gravity of more nebulous threats, such as climate change, are no less menacing, yet are often ignored or underestimated by individual human beings

Imo B

Human beings should come after comma .
Correct idiom is such as
B has correct modifier .
A yet are no menacing refers to human beings
C It is a fragment does not contain main verb
D The first modifier modifies gravity
E The first modifier modifies gravity
avatar
prateek9010
Joined: 30 Jul 2017
Last visit: 27 Sep 2017
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
yet are no less menacing refers to the "nebulous threats", such as climate change.
The main verb is not "are" it is "Ignore or Underestimate"
Thus B is correct
User avatar
AliciaSierra
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Last visit: 14 Jun 2024
Posts: 747
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,350
Products:
Posts: 747
Kudos: 642
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shasadou
With brains shaped by evolution to respond primarily to immediate physical peril, individual human beings often ignore or underestimate the gravity of more nebulous threats, such as climate change, yet are no less menacing.

(A) individual human beings often ignore or underestimate the gravity of more nebulous threats, such as climate change, yet are no less menacing

(B) individual human beings are prone to ignore, or else to underestimate, the gravity of more nebulous yet no less menacing threats, such as climate change

(C) individual human beings, often ignoring or underestimating the gravity of more nebulous threats, such as climate change, are no less menacing

(D) the gravity of threats, such as climate change, that are more nebulous yet no less menacing are often ignored, or else underestimated, by individual human beings

(E) the gravity of more nebulous threats, such as climate change, are no less menacing, yet are often ignored or underestimated by individual human beings

I got such a easy question wrong :(

Option A) Human beings are not less menacing + gravity are (it should be "is") no less menacing-- Wrong
Option C: Human beings are no less menacing--Wrong
D) Gravity of threats--wrong
e) Gravity of threats-- Wrong

OptionB : Human beings are
Prone to Ignore
else to underestimate
Gravity of more nebulous yet no less menacing threats, such as climate change

Subject+Verb is fine
No Parallelism, pronoun, modifier issue.

Option B is Best.
User avatar
adkikani
User avatar
IIM School Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Last visit: 24 Dec 2023
Posts: 1,236
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,207
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Other)
Posts: 1,236
Kudos: 1,343
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja KarishmaB generis
gmatexam439

I would like to respectfully disagree that there is an issue with subject verb
number agreement- are menacing- in (A). The verb - ignore - matches correctly as a plural form of verb with - are menacing.
I think it is the placement of phrase - such as climate change - that renders (A) incorrect. Let me know if I am correct.
User avatar
gmatexam439
User avatar
Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 1,064
Own Kudos:
2,159
 [1]
Given Kudos: 200
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
Posts: 1,064
Kudos: 2,159
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
adkikani
GMATNinja KarishmaB generis
gmatexam439

I would like to respectfully disagree that there is an issue with subject verb
number agreement- are menacing- in (A). The verb - ignore - matches correctly as a plural form of verb with - are menacing.
I think it is the placement of phrase - such as climate change - that renders (A) incorrect. Let me know if I am correct.

I agree! I don't see any SV disagreement.
avatar
owlette
Joined: 15 Sep 2018
Last visit: 22 Oct 2020
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 28
Location: United States
GPA: 4
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Isn't "menacing threats" redundant?
"menacing" means "threatening", so B is saying "threatening threats".
Why is this acceptable in GMAT?

Thanks.
User avatar
cool16
Joined: 24 Apr 2018
Last visit: 09 May 2022
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 643
Posts: 17
Kudos: 38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sayantanc2k
Alok322
daagh
A. individual human beings often ignore or underestimate the gravity of more nebulous threats, such as climate change, yet are no less menacing --- yet are no less menacing refers to individual human beings; not to the gravity of the nebulous threats; also it may be noted that if gravity was underestimated, the verb for the same should be in singular ‘is’ and not in plural ‘are’

B. individual human beings are prone to ignore, or else to underestimate, the gravity of more nebulous yet no less menacing threats, such as climate change -- seems to be the correct choice, except for the inclusion of the word 'else'. But that is not an unacceptable

C. individual human beings, often ignoring or underestimating the gravity of more nebulous threats, such as climate change, are no less menacing -- change in meaning; it is the threats that are no less menacing and not individuals
D. the gravity of threats, such as climate change, that are more nebulous yet no less menacing are often ignored, or else underestimated, by individual human beings --- The gravity of threats has no brains; misplaced modification
E. the gravity of more nebulous threats, such as climate change, are no less menacing, yet are often ignored or underestimated by individual human beings ---same as in D.

the original meaning of 'yet are no less menacing' is that humans are no less menacing and C stands gramatically perfect but y is C mentioned as change in meaning?
Can you please clarify where I am going wrong?

The structure of the sentence in option C is :

With brains shaped by evolution to respond primarily to immediate physical peril, individual human beings ,often ignoring or underestimating the gravity of more nebulous threats, such as climate change, are no less menacing.

The pink highlighted modifier is a prepositional phrase modifier for the subject individual human beings and the green highlighted part is a present participial modifier again for the subject individual human beings. The main verb of the sentence is are.

Once you cut down the fluff, the sentence reduces to:

Individual human beings are no less menacing.

You would now understand the above is not the intended meaning - the original meaning is more nebulous threats (such as climate change) are no less menacing.


Cant it be threats are no less menacing
User avatar
GmatKnightTutor
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Last visit: 01 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,228
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 5,228
Kudos: 1,568
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Questions like this, after the initial dangling modifiers are eliminated, are probably best read thoroughly to solve.
User avatar
800GMAT2019
Joined: 01 Jul 2019
Last visit: 30 May 2024
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 201
Products:
Posts: 48
Kudos: 58
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A X sentence fragment at the end
B Correct
C X Subj. "human beings" is not described by adjective "are no less menacing". "menacing" describes something else.
D X Subject "Gravity" does not have possession of subject "Brains"
E X Subject "Gravity" does not have possession of subject "Brains"
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,301
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,180
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,301
Kudos: 49,308
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Explanation

This sentence presents an unfortunate consequence of the evolution of the human brain: Because the brain evolved to respond to immediate physical threats, humans are less likely to appreciate the seriousness of threats that are less immediately apparent.

(A) The core structure of this sentence is individual human beings often ignore or underestimate … yet are no less menacing. According to the first portion of the sentence, the human beings are responding to threats; they are not themselves the threats. This choice illogically conveys that the humans themselves, rather than the nebulous threats, are no less menacing.

(B) CORRECT. To ignore and to underestimate are properly parallel, as are more nebulous and no less menacing. The opening modifier With brains is correctly placed to modify the subject individual human beings, and the modifier such as climate change is properly positioned after threats.

(C) The core structure of this sentence is individual human beings… are no less menacing. According to the first portion of the sentence, the human beings are responding to threats; they are not themselves the threats. This choice illogically conveys that the humans themselves, rather than the nebulous threats, are no less menacing.

(D) The opening modifier With brains seems to describe the gravity of threats; this is illogical, as gravity does not have brains. In addition, the singular subject the gravity does not agree with the plural verb are ignored.

(E) The opening modifier With brains seems to describe the gravity of more nebulous threats; this is illogical, as gravity does not have brains. The singular subject the gravity does not agree with the plural verb are. Finally, even if that verb were changed to is, the sentence would still not make sense, since the threats themselves, not the gravity of those threats, are menacing.

Answer: B
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,829
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,829
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts