GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 16 Oct 2019, 10:09

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 09 Apr 2016
Posts: 23
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Schools: NUS '18 (I)
GRE 1: Q165 V156
GPA: 3
WE: Analyst (Consulting)
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 10 Dec 2018, 08:45
14
79
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

29% (02:01) correct 71% (01:53) wrong based on 2235 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

A. A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

B. A country that keeps some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

C. A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, like the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

D. A country could keep some of the advantages of the European Union with an association agreement, as Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

E. A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, and yet find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

Originally posted by mukulgupta5 on 07 Jun 2016, 17:42.
Last edited by Bunuel on 10 Dec 2018, 08:45, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the question.
Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2014
Posts: 88
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jun 2016, 19:40
10
5
(A) Correct
(B) Distorts meaning.
(C) Clause can follow Like.It has to be noun/noun phrase
(D) Comparison is not proper.
(E) Two co-ordinating conjunctions AND and YET can not sit together. Either of them should be used

_________________
The Mind ~ Muscle Connection
My GMAT Journey is Complete.Going to start the MBA in Information Management from 2016
Good Luck everyone.
##### General Discussion
Marshall & McDonough Moderator
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1684
Location: India
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jun 2016, 19:33
3
2
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Correct - A country could keep ........... but it would..........

A country that keeps some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Incorrect - Changes the meaning

A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, like the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Incorrect - usage of 'like' is incorrect

A country could keep some of the advantages of the European Union with an association agreement, as Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Incorrect - usage of 'as' is incorrect

A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, and yet find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Incorrect - Usage of 'and' distorts the contrast

Manager
Joined: 01 Mar 2014
Posts: 108
Schools: Tepper '18
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jun 2016, 00:59
1
1
Vyshak wrote:
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Correct - A country could keep ........... but it would..........

A country that keeps some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Incorrect - Changes the meaning

A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, like the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Incorrect - usage of 'like' is incorrect

A country could keep some of the advantages of the European Union with an association agreement, as Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Incorrect - usage of 'as' is incorrect

A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, and yet find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Incorrect - Usage of 'and' distorts the contrast

IMO the usage of 'it' in option A twice referring to different things is incorrect. This is extremely ambiguous. As you rightly pointed out option E is also incorrect for using 'and' but still i think it is better than A. Can you please explain?
Marshall & McDonough Moderator
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1684
Location: India
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jun 2016, 01:16
MeghaP wrote:
Vyshak wrote:
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Correct - A country could keep ........... but it would..........

A country that keeps some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Incorrect - Changes the meaning

A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, like the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Incorrect - usage of 'like' is incorrect

A country could keep some of the advantages of the European Union with an association agreement, as Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Incorrect - usage of 'as' is incorrect

A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, and yet find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Incorrect - Usage of 'and' distorts the contrast

IMO the usage of 'it' in option A twice referring to different things is incorrect. This is extremely ambiguous. As you rightly pointed out option E is also incorrect for using 'and' but still i think it is better than A. Can you please explain?

The answer requires a contrast. So E cannot be the answer. In the colored portion the 1st 'it' logically refers to 'country' and the 2nd 'it' must logically refer to 'agreement'. A may not be a perfect answer choice, but it is the best possible answer choice.
Director
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 715
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jun 2016, 03:26
2
mukulgupta5 wrote:
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.
A country that keeps some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, like the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.
A country could keep some of the advantages of the European Union with an association agreement, as Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, and yet find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

look at d.
a country could keep as norway has
the latter part of ellipsis has an helping verb, the preceding part must have the same helping verb ,though it maybe is in different tense.
so, we have "has" in the latter part, we need "have, had" in the first part. no that word in the first part. D is wrong
Manager
Joined: 12 Feb 2014
Posts: 80
Location: India
Schools: LBS MIF '19
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.3
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jun 2016, 13:37
How exactly does the removal of the second 'it' change the meaning in B?

Retired Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2861
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jun 2016, 14:13
1
rs47 wrote:
How exactly does the removal of the second 'it' change the meaning in B?

In "B" removal of "it" does not change the meaning, but replacement of "could" with "that" changes the meaning.
Intern
Status: I am not giving up. Not yet.
Joined: 23 Jul 2015
Posts: 40
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2016, 04:59
Vyshak wrote:
MeghaP wrote:
Vyshak wrote:
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Correct - A country could keep ........... but it would..........

A country that keeps some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Incorrect - Changes the meaning

A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, like the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Incorrect - usage of 'like' is incorrect

A country could keep some of the advantages of the European Union with an association agreement, as Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Incorrect - usage of 'as' is incorrect

A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, and yet find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Incorrect - Usage of 'and' distorts the contrast

IMO the usage of 'it' in option A twice referring to different things is incorrect. This is extremely ambiguous. As you rightly pointed out option E is also incorrect for using 'and' but still i think it is better than A. Can you please explain?

The answer requires a contrast. So E cannot be the answer. In the colored portion the 1st 'it' logically refers to 'country' and the 2nd 'it' must logically refer to 'agreement'. A may not be a perfect answer choice, but it is the best possible answer choice.

In A
Is the second "it" not a 'Placeholder'?
Check this out: placeholder-it-111879.html
_________________
Cheers
PeeKay
Retired Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2861
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2016, 11:15
1
1
peekaysan wrote:
Vyshak wrote:
MeghaP wrote:

IMO the usage of 'it' in option A twice referring to different things is incorrect. This is extremely ambiguous. As you rightly pointed out option E is also incorrect for using 'and' but still i think it is better than A. Can you please explain?

The answer requires a contrast. So E cannot be the answer. In the colored portion the 1st 'it' logically refers to 'country' and the 2nd 'it' must logically refer to 'agreement'. A may not be a perfect answer choice, but it is the best possible answer choice.

In A
Is the second "it" not a 'Placeholder'?
Check this out: placeholder-it-111879.html

Yes the second "it" is a placeholder for "to influence trade and competition policy".
Intern
Joined: 27 Aug 2016
Posts: 4
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2016, 03:05
I have some confusion between A & C. A & C differ only in the use of "such as the one Norway has" and "like the one Norway has" . Could some please help me in identifying why "such as" is better suited here. I chose C as my answer.
Marshall & McDonough Moderator
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1684
Location: India
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2016, 03:17
1
Vin07 wrote:
I have some confusion between A & C. A & C differ only in the use of "such as the one Norway has" and "like the one Norway has" . Could some please help me in identifying why "such as" is better suited here. I chose C as my answer.

For examples, we use 'such as'. 'Like' is used to compare nouns.
Current Student
Joined: 16 Jul 2015
Posts: 21
Location: India
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
GPA: 3.4
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2016, 11:07
mukulgupta5 wrote:
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.
A country that keeps some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, like the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.
A country could keep some of the advantages of the European Union with an association agreement, as Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, and yet find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

If I remember correctly, egmat mentions the usage of "Of being" as incorrect. And the only acceptable usages of "Being" are:
1. If Being is Used as Noun
2. When Passive continuous verb tense is required to communicate the meaning.

Can anyone help explain if my understanding is correct.
Board of Directors
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3582
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2017, 09:50
andy2502 wrote:
mukulgupta5 wrote:
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.
A country that keeps some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, like the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.
A country could keep some of the advantages of the European Union with an association agreement, as Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, and yet find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

If I remember correctly, egmat mentions the usage of "Of being" as incorrect. And the only acceptable usages of "Being" are:
1. If Being is Used as Noun
2. When Passive continuous verb tense is required to communicate the meaning.

Can anyone help explain if my understanding is correct.

I would suggest try to deconstruct the meaning instead of learning such rules.

The sentence clearly states that the advantage of being a part of European movement and not advantage of European Union itself.

Hence, 'being' being a very tricky word, I would also go for the meaning before making a final call.
_________________
My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place

GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.
New! Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club!
Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free
Check our new About Us Page here.
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2016
Posts: 256
Location: India
GPA: 3.9
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Mar 2017, 09:02
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, as Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

Will the above sentence be incorrect?

I could not make the difference whether the author is trying to compare a country and Norway or presenting Norway as an example. Please help !
Retired Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2861
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Mar 2017, 13:00
3
1
AR15J wrote:
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, as Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

Will the above sentence be incorrect?

I could not make the difference whether the author is trying to compare a country and Norway or presenting Norway as an example. Please help !

A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, as Norway has KEPT, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

You missed the word "kept". A word that is not already present in the first element of a parallel structure cannot be omitted from the second element of the structure.
Senior Manager
Status: Countdown Begins...
Joined: 03 Jul 2016
Posts: 277
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 580 Q48 V22
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Mar 2017, 21:42
I have a doubt on use of a term - such as the ONE Norway has.

In my opinion, it implies that - A country can keep some advantages as Norway has kept its advantages.
If this is true, by stating "such as the ONE Norway has" , "ONE" refers to Norway or "Advantages"?. I felt it was referring to advantages and thought that it is a wrong comparison.

CEO
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 3049
Location: India
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Mar 2017, 02:18
RMD007 wrote:
I have a doubt on use of a term - such as the ONE Norway has.

In my opinion, it implies that - A country can keep some advantages as Norway has kept its advantages.
If this is true, by stating "such as the ONE Norway has" , "ONE" refers to Norway or "Advantages"?. I felt it was referring to advantages and thought that it is a wrong comparison.

Here one is referring to association agreement.

You should read with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has as with an association agreement, such as the association agreement that Norway has.
_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2016
Posts: 256
Location: India
GPA: 3.9
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2017, 08:14
sayantanc2k wrote:
AR15J wrote:
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, as Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

Will the above sentence be incorrect?

I could not make the difference whether the author is trying to compare a country and Norway or presenting Norway as an example. Please help !

A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, as Norway has KEPT, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

You missed the word "kept". A word that is not already present in the first element of a parallel structure cannot be omitted from the second element of the structure.

Thanks for clarifying. Will the below choice be correct?

A country could keep some of the advantages of the European Union with an association agreement, as the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2861
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Mar 2017, 06:13
AR15J wrote:
sayantanc2k wrote:
AR15J wrote:
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, as Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

Will the above sentence be incorrect?

I could not make the difference whether the author is trying to compare a country and Norway or presenting Norway as an example. Please help !

A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, as Norway has KEPT, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

You missed the word "kept". A word that is not already present in the first element of a parallel structure cannot be omitted from the second element of the structure.

Thanks for clarifying. Will the below choice be correct?

A country could keep some of the advantages of the European Union with an association agreement, as the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

No, LIKE instead of AS should be used because the comparison is between the nouns "association" and "one". The verbs " has" and "could keep" are not compared, hence "as" is wrong.

The following would be correct:

A country could keep some of the advantages of the European Union with an association agreement, like the one (that) Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

Note: "(that) Norway has" is a relative clause modifier referring to "one" - not a clause compared with the opening clause ("A country could keep some of the advantages...").
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U   [#permalink] 11 Mar 2017, 06:13

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 34 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by