It is currently 20 Jan 2018, 05:22

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A minority but influential investor in Quell has recently claimed that

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

4 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Status: In the realms of Chaos & Night
Joined: 13 Sep 2015
Posts: 171

Kudos [?]: 106 [4], given: 95

A minority but influential investor in Quell has recently claimed that [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2016, 05:47
4
This post received
KUDOS
11
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

31% (01:51) correct 69% (02:29) wrong based on 689 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A minority but influential investor in Quell has recently claimed that the company's stock is undervalued, citing as evidence the announced plan of Quell's CEO, who is the majority shareholder, to sell the company in a short period of time. According to the minority investor, the CEO is permitting or even encouraging an undervalued stock price so that he may get the company sold and liquidate his stake in the company. By accusing the CEO of having personal motives allow the stock price to become distorted, however, the minority investor is guilty of the precise accusation that he himself is making. This investor is known for using his influence to attempt to sway public opinion and meddle in otherwise well-calibrated deals in order to drive up share prices for his personal financial benefit.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides reasoning to undermine the support for the position being opposed.

(B) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second is reasoning that has been used to support the position being opposed.

(C) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole.

(D) The first is reasoning that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that reasoning.

(E) The first is reasoning that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Good luck
=========================================================================================
"If a street performer makes you stop walking, you owe him a buck"
"If this post helps you on your GMAT journey, drop a +1 Kudo "


"Thursdays with Ron - Consolidated Verbal Master List - Updated"


Last edited by Nightfury14 on 18 Jul 2016, 08:34, edited 2 times in total.

Kudos [?]: 106 [4], given: 95

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 17 Feb 2015
Posts: 17

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 52

WE: Sales (Consulting)
Re: A minority but influential investor in Quell has recently claimed that [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2016, 06:33
Nightfury14 wrote:
A minority but influential investor in Quell has recently claimed that the company's stock is undervalued, citing as evidence the announced plan of Quell's CEO, who is the majoirity shareholder, to sell the company in a short period of time. According to the minority investor, the CEO is permitting or even encouraging an undervalued stock price so that he may get the company sold and liquidate his stake in the company. By accusing the CEO of having personal motives allow the stock price to become distorted, however, the minority investor is guilty of the precise accusation that he himself is making. This investor is known for using his influence to attempt to sway public opinion and meddle in otherwise well-calibrated deals in order to drive up share prices for his personal financial benefit.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(a) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides reasoning to undermine the support for the position being opposed.
(b) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second is reasoning that has been used to support the position being opposed
(c) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole
(d) The first is reasoning that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that reasoning.
(e) The first is reasoning that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole.


Boldface highlighted.

OA C?

Second bold statement is the main conclusion.

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 52

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 22 Jun 2016
Posts: 244

Kudos [?]: 115 [1], given: 10

Reviews Badge
Re: A minority but influential investor in Quell has recently claimed that [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2016, 06:37
1
This post received
KUDOS
rohitt911 wrote:
Nightfury14 wrote:
A minority but influential investor in Quell has recently claimed that the company's stock is undervalued, citing as evidence the announced plan of Quell's CEO, who is the majoirity shareholder, to sell the company in a short period of time. According to the minority investor, the CEO is permitting or even encouraging an undervalued stock price so that he may get the company sold and liquidate his stake in the company. By accusing the CEO of having personal motives allow the stock price to become distorted, however, the minority investor is guilty of the precise accusation that he himself is making. This investor is known for using his influence to attempt to sway public opinion and meddle in otherwise well-calibrated deals in order to drive up share prices for his personal financial benefit.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(a) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides reasoning to undermine the support for the position being opposed.
(b) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second is reasoning that has been used to support the position being opposed
(c) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole
(d) The first is reasoning that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that reasoning.
(e) The first is reasoning that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole.


Boldface highlighted.

OA C?

Second bold statement is the main conclusion.


I don't think these two will be bold faced in the question. Well, I might be wrong also. Nightfury14 Please highlight the bold faced sentences.
_________________

P.S. Don't forget to give Kudos :)

Kudos [?]: 115 [1], given: 10

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Status: In the realms of Chaos & Night
Joined: 13 Sep 2015
Posts: 171

Kudos [?]: 106 [0], given: 95

Re: A minority but influential investor in Quell has recently claimed that [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2016, 07:47
14101992 wrote:

I don't think these two will be bold faced in the question. Well, I might be wrong also. Nightfury14 Please highlight the bold faced sentences.


Regret .. missed it the first time. Boldface updated
_________________

Good luck
=========================================================================================
"If a street performer makes you stop walking, you owe him a buck"
"If this post helps you on your GMAT journey, drop a +1 Kudo "


"Thursdays with Ron - Consolidated Verbal Master List - Updated"

Kudos [?]: 106 [0], given: 95

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 28 Feb 2016
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: 1 [1], given: 1

Schools: Johnson '19
Reviews Badge
Re: A minority but influential investor in Quell has recently claimed that [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2016, 11:07
1
This post received
KUDOS
Can anyone explain the logic behind selecting C? I do not see how the argument as a whole is "opposing that the stock is undervalued".

Kudos [?]: 1 [1], given: 1

Expert Post
Verbal Expert
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3278

Kudos [?]: 3797 [0], given: 22

Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: A minority but influential investor in Quell has recently claimed that [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jul 2016, 01:04
bballallstar6464 wrote:
Can anyone explain the logic behind selecting C? I do not see how the argument as a whole is "opposing that the stock is undervalued".


I agree. I could not find any indication / reasoning that the passage as a whole opposes (or supports) the claim that " the company's stock is undervalued". The minority investor thinks that the stock is undervalued. But there is no statement in the passage that shows that the author of the passage opposes (or aligns with) the minority investor on this point.

All we can deduce is that the author blames the investor for the same reason that the investor blames the CEO - that the investor is trying to drive up the stock price. It is not clear whether the author agrees ( or disagrees) that the stockprice is undervalued.

Kudos [?]: 3797 [0], given: 22

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Verbal Expert
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3278

Kudos [?]: 3797 [1], given: 22

Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: A minority but influential investor in Quell has recently claimed that [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jul 2016, 01:11
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
abhishek2804 wrote:
Seems D here. What's the OA?

Sent from my ONE A2003 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app


Option D is incorrect, because the underlined portion itself is a position (claimed by the investor) and not a reasoning that supports some other position.

The OA mentioned is C, although I am not convinced about the same. Please see my post above.

Kudos [?]: 3797 [1], given: 22

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 482

Kudos [?]: 41 [1], given: 342

Concentration: Finance, Marketing
A minority but influential investor in Quell has recently claimed that [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2016, 03:25
1
This post received
KUDOS
(C) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole.


(E) The first is reasoning that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole.

the company's stock is undervalued => is not reasoning.

C is the answer

Last edited by abrakadabra21 on 01 Oct 2017, 00:23, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 41 [1], given: 342

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 18 Sep 2015
Posts: 108

Kudos [?]: 37 [1], given: 612

GMAT 1: 610 Q43 V31
GMAT 2: 610 Q47 V27
GMAT 3: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 4: 700 Q49 V35
WE: Project Management (Health Care)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A minority but influential investor in Quell has recently claimed that [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Oct 2016, 04:52
1
This post received
KUDOS
Nightfury14 wrote:
A minority but influential investor in Quell has recently claimed that the company's stock is undervalued, citing as evidence the announced plan of Quell's CEO, who is the majoirity shareholder, to sell the company in a short period of time. According to the minority investor, the CEO is permitting or even encouraging an undervalued stock price so that he may get the company sold and liquidate his stake in the company. By accusing the CEO of having personal motives allow the stock price to become distorted, however, the minority investor is guilty of the precise accusation that he himself is making. This investor is known for using his influence to attempt to sway public opinion and meddle in otherwise well-calibrated deals in order to drive up share prices for his personal financial benefit.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(a) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides reasoning to undermine the support for the position being opposed.
(b) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second is reasoning that has been used to support the position being opposed
(c) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole
(d) The first is reasoning that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that reasoning.
(e) The first is reasoning that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole.


- The first is a CONCLUSION that a rival of the author concludes.
- The author later accuses his rival in doing the same thing that his rival protest against.
- So:
* the first - is a conclusion that the argument opposes.
* the second - is the main conclusion of this text.

A - X - 1st part correct; 2nd part - wrong- this is not reasoning but a conclusion.
B - X - 1st part correct; 2nd part - wrong- this is not reasoning but a conclusion.
C - V - 1st part correct; 2nd part correct;
D - X -1st part wrong - As in E.
E - X -1st part wrong - this is not a reasoning, but a conclusion. reasoning could be a deduction that supports the main conclusion (Intermediate Conclusion/ or general statement/belief)

Kudos [?]: 37 [1], given: 612

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
B
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 624

Kudos [?]: 557 [1], given: 16

Location: India
Re: A minority but influential investor in Quell has recently claimed that [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Jun 2017, 17:15
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
Nightfury14 wrote:
A minority but influential investor in Quell has recently claimed that the company's stock is undervalued, citing as evidence the announced plan of Quell's CEO, who is the majoirity shareholder, to sell the company in a short period of time. According to the minority investor, the CEO is permitting or even encouraging an undervalued stock price so that he may get the company sold and liquidate his stake in the company. By accusing the CEO of having personal motives allow the stock price to become distorted, however, the minority investor is guilty of the precise accusation that he himself is making. This investor is known for using his influence to attempt to sway public opinion and meddle in otherwise well-calibrated deals in order to drive up share prices for his personal financial benefit.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(a) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides reasoning to undermine the support for the position being opposed.
(b) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second is reasoning that has been used to support the position being opposed
(c) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole
(d) The first is reasoning that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that reasoning.
(e) The first is reasoning that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole.

It is C because the author does not agree with the claim/view that the stock is undervalued. He attributes ulterior motive to the person making that claim. The second boldface is easier to understand.
_________________

Srinivasan Vaidyaraman
Sravna
http://www.sravnatestprep.com

Premium Material
Standardized Approaches

Kudos [?]: 557 [1], given: 16

VP
VP
User avatar
G
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1106

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 607

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: 314 Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)
CAT Tests
Re: A minority but influential investor in Quell has recently claimed that [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jun 2017, 08:12
Can any one explain why option B is wrong .
And any specific strategy for Boldface questions.

_________________

We are more often frightened than hurt; and we suffer more from imagination than from reality

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 607

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Status: Active
Affiliations: NA
Joined: 23 Oct 2012
Posts: 328

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 59

GMAT 1: 590 Q50 V21
GMAT 2: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V37
GPA: 3.5
Re: A minority but influential investor in Quell has recently claimed that [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Aug 2017, 07:15
arvind910619 wrote:
Can any one explain why option B is wrong .
And any specific strategy for Boldface questions.


If you can determine if a statement is premise or conclusion in the given argument while reading , you will be close to the answer.
_________________

#If you like my post , please encourage me by giving Kudos :)

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 59

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Aug 2016
Posts: 15

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 1

A minority but influential investor in Quell has recently claimed that [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Aug 2017, 00:22
Vocal Shareholders
A minority but influential investor in Quell has recently claimed that the company's stock is undervalued, citing as evidence the announced plan of Quell's CEO, who is the majority shareholder, to sell the company within a short period of time. According to the minority investor, the CEO is permitting or even encouraging an undervalued stock price so that he may get the company sold and liquidate his stake in the company. By accusing the CEO of having personal motives allow the stock price to become distorted, however, the minority investor is guilty of the precise accusation that he himself is making. This investor is known for using his influence to attempt to sway public opinion and meddle in otherwise well-calibrated deals in order to drive up share prices for his personal financial benefit.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?


A.The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides reasoning to undermine the support for the position being opposed.

B. The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second is reasoning that has been used to support the position being opposed.

C.The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole.

D.The first is reasoning that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that reasoning.

E.The first is reasoning that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole.


source: Gmatfree

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 1

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 04 Feb 2017
Posts: 58

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 53

GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: A minority but influential investor in Quell has recently claimed that [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Aug 2017, 08:05
I dont see find reasoning here..

its like only simple facts are given..

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 53

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 01 Feb 2015
Posts: 62

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 39

Re: A minority but influential investor in Quell has recently claimed that [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2017, 06:50
SravnaTestPrep wrote:
Nightfury14 wrote:
A minority but influential investor in Quell has recently claimed that the company's stock is undervalued, citing as evidence the announced plan of Quell's CEO, who is the majoirity shareholder, to sell the company in a short period of time. According to the minority investor, the CEO is permitting or even encouraging an undervalued stock price so that he may get the company sold and liquidate his stake in the company. By accusing the CEO of having personal motives allow the stock price to become distorted, however, the minority investor is guilty of the precise accusation that he himself is making. This investor is known for using his influence to attempt to sway public opinion and meddle in otherwise well-calibrated deals in order to drive up share prices for his personal financial benefit.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(a) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides reasoning to undermine the support for the position being opposed.
(b) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second is reasoning that has been used to support the position being opposed
(c) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole
(d) The first is reasoning that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that reasoning.
(e) The first is reasoning that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole.

It is C because the author does not agree with the claim/view that the stock is undervalued. He attributes ulterior motive to the person making that claim. The second boldface is easier to understand.


Can you explain this is in more detail please? thanks!

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 39

Re: A minority but influential investor in Quell has recently claimed that   [#permalink] 19 Aug 2017, 06:50
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A minority but influential investor in Quell has recently claimed that

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.