Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4680

ACME’s manufacturing costs for sets of horseshoes include [#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Sep 2013, 09:55
Question Stats:
77% (01:47) correct 23% (01:58) wrong based on 258 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Without a calculator, solve this problem in 90 seconds. ACME’s manufacturing costs for sets of horseshoes include a $11,450 initial outlay, and $19.75 per set. They can sell the sets $52.50. If profit is revenue from sales minus manufacturing costs, and the company produces & sells 987 sets of horseshoes, what was their profit? (A) $20,874.25 (B) $30,943.25 (C) $41,308.50 (D) $51,817.50 (E) $53,624.25 For a discussion of the valuable skill of estimation on the GMAT Quant section, as well as an efficient solution to this problem, see: http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/thepower ... matquant/Mike
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________
Mike McGarry Magoosh Test Prep
Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)





Intern
Joined: 05 Oct 2013
Posts: 21

Re: ACME’s manufacturing costs for sets of horseshoes include [#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Oct 2013, 07:15
mikemcgarry wrote: Without a calculator, solve this problem in 90 seconds. ACME’s manufacturing costs for sets of horseshoes include a $11,450 initial outlay, and $19.75 per set. They can sell the sets $52.50. If profit is revenue from sales minus manufacturing costs, and the company produces & sells 987 sets of horseshoes, what was their profit? (A) $20,874.25 (B) $30,943.25 (C) $41,308.50 (D) $51,817.50 (E) $53,624.25 For a discussion of the valuable skill of estimation on the GMAT Quant section, as well as an efficient solution to this problem, see: http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/thepower ... matquant/Mike Their profit was 987*(52.519.75) 11.450 ~1000*32 11,500 ~ 20,000. The answer is A



Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Apr 2012
Posts: 441

Re: ACME’s manufacturing costs for sets of horseshoes include [#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Nov 2013, 02:18
mikemcgarry wrote: Without a calculator, solve this problem in 90 seconds. ACME’s manufacturing costs for sets of horseshoes include a $11,450 initial outlay, and $19.75 per set. They can sell the sets $52.50. If profit is revenue from sales minus manufacturing costs, and the company produces & sells 987 sets of horseshoes, what was their profit? (A) $20,874.25 (B) $30,943.25 (C) $41,308.50 (D) $51,817.50 (E) $53,624.25 For a discussion of the valuable skill of estimation on the GMAT Quant section, as well as an efficient solution to this problem, see: http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/thepower ... matquant/Mike Hi Mike, I followed the link be I didn't understand the concept as to when do you round up and when do you round down? When you rounded 11450 to 10000 it seems like a lot to round down. I thought that once you did that, you would round both the other number up to account for it. Does it even matter? How do you choose?



Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4680

Re: ACME’s manufacturing costs for sets of horseshoes include [#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Nov 2013, 11:40
ronr34 wrote: Hi Mike, I followed the link be I didn't understand the concept as to when do you round up and when do you round down? When you rounded 11450 to 10000 it seems like a lot to round down. I thought that once you did that, you would round both the other number up to account for it. Does it even matter? How do you choose? Dear ronr34, As with many things with numbers, you need to develop number sense. Here's a blog about it http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/numbersenseforthegmat/Developing number sense takes time. The more you do math without any calculator, the more your intuition for numbers will develop. When I estimate, I often try to make things as simple as possible. Numbers with only one nonzero digit are very simple  that's a good target for GMAT estimation. Starting with 11,450, the closest number with only one nonzero digit is 10,000. Usually, on GMAT questions, that's a fine level for estimation. It's very convenient, because even if you have to multiply, it's just onedigit arithmetic with some zeros stuck at the end.  If you can compensate a roundup with a rounddown, that can help, but often even that is not necessary, especially if the answer choices are very far apart. Does this make sense? Mike
_________________
Mike McGarry Magoosh Test Prep
Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)



Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Apr 2012
Posts: 441

Re: ACME’s manufacturing costs for sets of horseshoes include [#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Nov 2013, 14:02
mikemcgarry wrote: ronr34 wrote: Hi Mike, I followed the link be I didn't understand the concept as to when do you round up and when do you round down? When you rounded 11450 to 10000 it seems like a lot to round down. I thought that once you did that, you would round both the other number up to account for it. Does it even matter? How do you choose? Dear ronr34, As with many things with numbers, you need to develop number sense. Here's a blog about it http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/numbersenseforthegmat/Developing number sense takes time. The more you do math without any calculator, the more your intuition for numbers will develop. When I estimate, I often try to make things as simple as possible. Numbers with only one nonzero digit are very simple  that's a good target for GMAT estimation. Starting with 11,450, the closest number with only one nonzero digit is 10,000. Usually, on GMAT questions, that's a fine level for estimation. It's very convenient, because even if you have to multiply, it's just onedigit arithmetic with some zeros stuck at the end.  If you can compensate a roundup with a rounddown, that can help, but often even that is not necessary, especially if the answer choices are very far apart. Does this make sense? Mike Great. I followed the link and others that were in the post. but I still sometimes, when the answers are close together and there is not big split, get confused.



Current Student
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1954
Concentration: Finance

Re: ACME’s manufacturing costs for sets of horseshoes include [#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Jan 2014, 06:29
mikemcgarry wrote: ronr34 wrote: Hi Mike, I followed the link be I didn't understand the concept as to when do you round up and when do you round down? When you rounded 11450 to 10000 it seems like a lot to round down. I thought that once you did that, you would round both the other number up to account for it. Does it even matter? How do you choose? Dear ronr34, As with many things with numbers, you need to develop number sense. Here's a blog about it http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/numbersenseforthegmat/Developing number sense takes time. The more you do math without any calculator, the more your intuition for numbers will develop. When I estimate, I often try to make things as simple as possible. Numbers with only one nonzero digit are very simple  that's a good target for GMAT estimation. Starting with 11,450, the closest number with only one nonzero digit is 10,000. Usually, on GMAT questions, that's a fine level for estimation. It's very convenient, because even if you have to multiply, it's just onedigit arithmetic with some zeros stuck at the end.  If you can compensate a roundup with a rounddown, that can help, but often even that is not necessary, especially if the answer choices are very far apart. Does this make sense? Mike Yes mike it does make sense and that is what I usually do in this case 987 = 1000 and 52.519.75 is just something near 32 And then 11,450 is just near 12,000 So everything comes near 20,000 Also when estimating it is important to try to compensate rounding and also in fractions good to know the heavy division shortcut for some problems that involve raw estimates Just my 2cents Cheers! J



Manager
Joined: 13 Sep 2014
Posts: 94
WE: Engineering (Consulting)

Re: ACME’s manufacturing costs for sets of horseshoes include [#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Oct 2014, 09:08
approximations 19.75 = 20.00 52.50 = 50 987 = 1000 Initial cost = 20*1000 + 11450 = 31450 Selling = 50 * 1000 = 50000 Profit = 50000  31450 = 19000 close to 20k ans. A



NonHuman User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 13800

Re: ACME’s manufacturing costs for sets of horseshoes include [#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Feb 2017, 15:11
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Books  GMAT Club Tests  Best Prices on GMAT Courses  GMAT Mobile App  Math Resources  Verbal Resources




Re: ACME’s manufacturing costs for sets of horseshoes include
[#permalink]
11 Feb 2017, 15:11






