Hey
jabhatta2Happy to help you with this very interesting question. There are two important learnings from this question, one of which is the answer to the question you've asked. I'm going to take the liberty to explain both points. I hope you benefit from this explanation. Here goes:
The answer to your question lies in advanced meaning analysis. Start by asking yourself what exactly does the author seek to convey?
Let's take a look:
OS:
Although she was considered among her contemporaries to be the better poet than her husband,
later Elizabeth Barrett Browning was overshadowed by his success.
Let's try to make sense of the constituent ideas:
a. Elizabeth was considered among her contemporaries to be the better poet than her husband.
b. Elizabeth was later overshadowed by her husband's success.
c. The author also seeks to establish a contrast between the two ideas.
Probing Questions:
1. Whenever dealing with a contrast, ask yourself which of the two ideas is the subordinate idea and which is the main idea, LOGICALLY. In other words,
a. Although Elizabeth was considered by her contemporaries the better poet, she was later overshadowed by her husband's success? or
c. Although she was later overshadowed by her husband's success, she was considered by her contemporaries the better poet?
Which of the above makes more sense?
Notice that 'a' is illogical, because her later being overshadowed by her husband's success despite her contemporaries considering her the better poet makes no sense.
1. She was considered by her contemporaries the better poet - is an absolute fact that applies to Elizabeth's and her contemporaries' lifetime.
2. So, the word 'later' makes no sense here as it would refer to the period of time after Elizabeth's death.
But 'b' is logical. Her being considered the better poet despite her later being overshadowed by her husband's success, makes logical sense.
1. Elizabeth had greater success initially.
2. Elizabeth was later overshadowed by her husband's success.
3. But, her contemporaries continued to consider her the better poet.
Hence, eliminate choices A, B, and E.
2. What is the topic of contrast?
The underlying topic of contrast is "
who was the better poet?" In other words,
who overshadowed whom? Or,
who's success was greater?
In such a context, it would be illogical to say one person's
success overshadowed the other
person. Either
one person overshadowed the other, or
one person's success overshadowed the other's success. In this context, the word '
overshadowed' means "
to make somebody/something seem less important, or successful than another". (Reference: Meaning 1 @
https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries. ... ershadowed)
Hence, putting the two together, we realize that the original sentence has two gross meaning/logical errors, and choice D automatically becomes the best of the given choices.
I hope this explanation helps you understand the importance of meaning analysis, the difference between a main and a subordinate idea, and the significance of logical parallelism.
Happy Learning!
Abhishek