Last visit was: 20 May 2025, 12:34 It is currently 20 May 2025, 12:34
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
605-655 Level|   Assumption|                              
User avatar
notwithstanding
Joined: 01 Aug 2015
Last visit: 01 Aug 2015
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
2,418
 [471]
Posts: 8
Kudos: 2,418
 [471]
47
Kudos
Add Kudos
423
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatVerbal
User avatar
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Last visit: 17 Feb 2025
Posts: 1,694
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 766
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,694
Kudos: 15,008
 [112]
64
Kudos
Add Kudos
47
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatVerbal
User avatar
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Last visit: 17 Feb 2025
Posts: 1,694
Own Kudos:
15,008
 [33]
Given Kudos: 766
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,694
Kudos: 15,008
 [33]
22
Kudos
Add Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 20 May 2025
Posts: 7,307
Own Kudos:
67,956
 [31]
Given Kudos: 1,932
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,307
Kudos: 67,956
 [31]
23
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
adkikani
Hi GMATNinja generis GMATNinjaTwo

Can experts please comment on using negation technique of D/A?
Quote:
Although the school would receive financial benefits if it had soft drink vending machines in the cafeteria, we should not allow them. Allowing soft drink machines there would not be in our students' interest. If our students start drinking more soft drinks, they will be less healthy.

The argument depends on which of the following?

(A) If the soft drink vending machines were placed in the cafeteria, students would consume more soft drinks as a result.
(B) The amount of soft drinks that most students at the school currently drink is not detrimental to their health.
(C) Students are apt to be healthier if they do not drink soft drinks at all than if they just drink small amounts occasionally.
(D) Students will not simply bring soft drinks from home if the soft drink vending machines are not placed in the cafeteria.
(E) The school's primary concern should be to promote good health among its students.

The author concludes that "allowing soft drink machines in the school cafeteria would not be in the students' interest. Why not? Because if the students start drinking more soft drinks, they will be less healthy.

In order for the argument to hold, we need to assume that students will drink MORE soft drinks if the machines are added. In other words, the argument tells us that student health is negatively affected by an increase in soft drink consumption. But we don't know whether adding the machines will actually increase soft drink consumption.

This represents a gap in the logic. What if students will drink the same amount if the machines are installed? In that case, adding the machines would have no impact on the students' health, and the argument would fall apart.

Choice (A) eliminates this possibility and fills the gap. If we negate (A), then students might not drink more soft drinks when the machines are added. In that case, the argument is not valid.

As for choice (D), let's say that the students WILL bring soft drinks from home if the soft drink vending machines are not placed in the cafeteria. At first glance, this might seem to impact the argument. If the machines aren't there, the students will simply bring soft drinks from home.

But choice (D) doesn't tell us anything about the QUANTITY of soda that is consumed in each case. For example, without the machines, a student might bring one soft drink bottle from home every day. WITH the machines, that student might purchase TWO soft drink bottles every day. Adding the machines increases that student's soft drink consumption even though choice (D) is not true. Negating (D) does not necessarily affect the argument, so (D) should be eliminated.

(A) is the best answer.
User avatar
GMATRockstar
Joined: 21 Apr 2014
Last visit: 19 Nov 2024
Posts: 90
Own Kudos:
784
 [29]
Given Kudos: 3
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 90
Kudos: 784
 [29]
27
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
PathFinder007
Joined: 10 Mar 2014
Last visit: 21 Oct 2018
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
714
 [2]
Given Kudos: 13
Posts: 132
Kudos: 714
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EMPOWERgmatMax
Although the school would receive financial benefits if it had soft drink vending machines in the cafeteria, we should not allow them. Allowing soft drink machines there would not be in our students' interest. If our students start drinking more soft drinks, they will be less healthy.

The argument depends on which of the following?

(A) If the soft drink vending machines were placed in the cafeteria, students would consume more soft drinks as a result.
(B) The amount of soft drinks that most students at the school currently drink is not detrimental to their health.
(C) Students are apt to be healthier if they do not drink soft drinks at all than if they just drink small amounts occasionally.
(D) Students will not simply bring soft drinks from home if the soft drink vending machines are not placed in the cafeteria.
(E) The school's primary concern should be to promote good health among its students.


EMPOWERgmat Enhanced Explanation:

Type: Assumption
Boil It Down: More soft drinks, less healthy -> Vending mach. Shouldn’t be allowed
Missing Information: These vending machines would lead to net overall worsening of health
Goal: Find the option the argument requires for the logic to hold

Yes! The argument ABSOLUTELY requires this option. How do we know that these students wouldn’t be consuming soda anyway? The argument depends on the notion that these soda machines would actually lead to a net increase in soda consumption.

Whether the typical soda intake at the skill is small, normal, or excessive doesn’t matter. The argument is that health will get WORSE regardless of the starting point. This option is not something the argument requires.

The argument doesn’t hinge on the notion that students are likely to be healthier with no soda. We’d have to assume that C even applies to these students. For all we know, maybe not a single child at this school is soda free.

Even if students bring soda from home, the argument still holds because the convenience of the vending machines at school could still cause some students to consume more soda than they would have otherwise.

The argument doesn’t depend on what the school’s PRIMARY concern is. The argument could still stand if student health and soda consumption were a considerable concern.
.

Hi,

I have doubt regarding option D. if student will bring soda from home then they are going to be unhealthy in that case also. or if option uses all students will bring soda from home then it would be correct choice. please clarify?

Thanks
avatar
OptimusPrepJanielle
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Last visit: 08 Sep 2017
Posts: 1,781
Own Kudos:
1,434
 [2]
Given Kudos: 23
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,781
Kudos: 1,434
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
PathFinder007
Hi,

I have doubt regarding option D. if student will bring soda from home then they are going to be unhealthy in that case also. or if option uses all students will bring soda from home then it would be correct choice. please clarify?

Thanks

Hi PathFinder007,

We don't know that students aren't already doing this, the practice may or may not be already in place.
So we can't say that they'll start if the vending machines aren't placed.
avatar
rsh12
Joined: 25 Sep 2015
Last visit: 16 Apr 2021
Posts: 85
Own Kudos:
118
 [3]
Given Kudos: 75
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V37
GRE 1: Q750 V600
GPA: 3.26
Products:
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V37
GRE 1: Q750 V600
Posts: 85
Kudos: 118
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EMPOWERgmatMax
Although the school would receive financial benefits if it had soft drink vending machines in the cafeteria, we should not allow them. Allowing soft drink machines there would not be in our students' interest. If our students start drinking more soft drinks, they will be less healthy.

The argument depends on which of the following?

(A) If the soft drink vending machines were placed in the cafeteria, students would consume more soft drinks as a result.
(B) The amount of soft drinks that most students at the school currently drink is not detrimental to their health.
(C) Students are apt to be healthier if they do not drink soft drinks at all than if they just drink small amounts occasionally.
(D) Students will not simply bring soft drinks from home if the soft drink vending machines are not placed in the cafeteria.
(E) The school's primary concern should be to promote good health among its students.


EMPOWERgmat Enhanced Explanation:

Type: Assumption


Boil It Down: More soft drinks, less healthy -> Vending mach. Shouldn’t be allowed
Missing Information: These vending machines would lead to net overall worsening of health
Goal: Find the option the argument requires for the logic to hold

Yes! The argument ABSOLUTELY requires this option. How do we know that these students wouldn’t be consuming soda anyway? The argument depends on the notion that these soda machines would actually lead to a net increase in soda consumption.

Whether the typical soda intake at the skill is small, normal, or excessive doesn’t matter. The argument is that health will get WORSE regardless of the starting point. This option is not something the argument requires.

The argument doesn’t hinge on the notion that students are likely to be healthier with no soda. We’d have to assume that C even applies to these students. For all we know, maybe not a single child at this school is soda free.

Even if students bring soda from home, the argument still holds because the convenience of the vending machines at school could still cause some students to consume more soda than they would have otherwise.

The argument doesn’t depend on what the school’s PRIMARY concern is. The argument could still stand if student health and soda consumption were a considerable concern.

Not convinced with your explanation as to why D is wrong. D should be defending the conclusion that Students wont bring soda from home and still be unhealthy right?
User avatar
TeamGMATIFY
Joined: 20 Aug 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2016
Posts: 341
Own Kudos:
1,480
 [19]
Given Kudos: 10
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
Posts: 341
Kudos: 1,480
 [19]
17
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
We have already spoken a lot about why answer choice A is the correct answer choice. Now lets focus on why answer choice D is not the right answer choice.


Students will not simply bring soft drinks from home if the soft drink vending machines are not placed in the cafeteria.

The point of concern here is that whether vending machines in the cafeteria will urge students to drink more soft drinks. So all other other options such as bring cold drinks, having more soft drinks after school, or at home is out of scope. We are talking about whether vending machines in the cafeteria will urge students to have more soft drinks.

Let's also apply negation test:

Students will simply bring soft drinks from home if the soft drink vending machines are not placed in the cafeteria.

So what? This doesn't weaken the conc. This can very well be the case right now with some of the students. Main points is whether having vending machines will urge students to drink more.

Hope it helps.
User avatar
rishi02
Joined: 21 Sep 2015
Last visit: 06 Jan 2025
Posts: 86
Own Kudos:
498
 [1]
Given Kudos: 403
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V42
GMAT 2: 750 Q50 V41
GMAT 3: 760 Q49 V46
Products:
GMAT 3: 760 Q49 V46
Posts: 86
Kudos: 498
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Although the school would receive financial benefits if it had soft drink vending machines in the cafeteria, we should not allow them. CONCLUSION

Allowing soft drink machines there would not be in our students' interest. PREMISE

If our students start drinking more soft drinks, they will be less healthy.
PREMISE

The correct assumption( unstated premise) will strengthen the existing argument by filling a gap

" If the soft drink vending machines were placed in the cafeteria, students would consume more soft drinks as a result" logically connects deployment of soft drink vending machines to students drinking more soft drinks and hence is the right answer.
User avatar
akela
Joined: 30 Jan 2016
Last visit: 23 May 2023
Posts: 1,228
Own Kudos:
5,543
 [14]
Given Kudos: 128
Products:
Posts: 1,228
Kudos: 5,543
 [14]
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This question is based on principles of conditional reasoning and formal logic:

Questions stem:
Vending machines -> Financial benefits
Students drink more SD -> Students become Less healthy

In assumption questions, the answer choice gives the missing link in reasoning, thereby filling the gap:

A. Vending machines -> students drink more SD

So, this answer choice gives us the missing link in reasoning:

Vending machines -> students drink more SD -> Students become Less healthy
User avatar
Rumikido3
Joined: 30 Sep 2015
Last visit: 28 Feb 2017
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
87
 [3]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: United States (MD)
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V27
WE:Marketing (Consumer Packaged Goods)
Products:
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V27
Posts: 45
Kudos: 87
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi guys... Here is my analysis

Structure
Conc: we should not allow SDV machines in cafeteria despite the $$$ benefit
P1: +Soft drinks --> - healthy
P2: Allowing SDV machines not in S's interests

Argument analysis
1st Falsify conclusion: In which scenario we should allow SDV machines in cafeteria given the fact that will bring $$$ benefit, but would be less healthier for students
Scenario 1: If there is evidence suggesting that the presence of SDV won't encourage students to drink sodas.
The assumption would be the negation of this scenario: The presence of SDV will encourage students to drink sodas.

Answer choice analysis
The argument depends on which of the following?
(A) If the soft drink vending machines were placed in the cafeteria, students would consume more soft drinks as a result. Correct!
Aligned with pre-thinking


(B) The amount of soft drinks that most students at the school currently drink is not detrimental to their health. Irrelevant
The argument is not concerned with the amount of soft drinks students consume. It is concern with SDV machines.


(C) Students are apt to be healthier if they do not drink soft drinks at all than if they just drink small amounts occasionally. Irrelevant
The amount of soft drink students intake is not in discussion.


(D) Students will not simply bring soft drinks from home if the soft drink vending machines are not placed in the cafeteria. OFS
This scenario (SDV machine are not placed in cafeteria) is not in discussion.


(E) The school's primary concern should be to promote good health among its students. Irrelevant
School's primary concern or goal is not in discussion.
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 20 May 2025
Posts: 4,849
Own Kudos:
8,508
 [8]
Given Kudos: 226
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,849
Kudos: 8,508
 [8]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
read the answer options carefully to see what exactly the argument is saying -

Counter Argument:
Soft drink vending machines in cafeteria --> financial benefits.

Author's argument:
students drink MORE Soft drinks --> LESS Healthy --> NO Soft drink vending machines in cafeteria

We have been asked to find an assumption for the author's argument.

Option A - correct answer.
If the author has to make his argument, then installing vending machines should lead to higher consumption of soft drinks.

Option B - Incorrect.
Whether the amount is detrimental or not is not relevant. All we are concerned about is whether the installation of vending machines leads to higher consumption of soft drinks and consequently makes students less healthy.
Moreover, negating this answer option kind of strengthens the author's argument. Hence, incorrect.

Option C - Incorrect.
this option is not relevant as we know already from the argument that installing vending machines leads them to drink MORE. this means that the amount they consumed earlier was not 0.
That is the argument is making the comparison between consumption of some amount to more amount.
this option compares 0 to a small amount. What is applicable here need not necessarily apply to the argument.

Option D - Incorrect.
Even if they bring soft drinks from home, this option does not necessarily imply that they will drink more soft drinks than before. This means that they will still be MORE healthy than if the vending machines were installed.
The argument still stands after negation. Hence, incorrect.

Option E - Incorrect.
Nowhere is it stated that it is the "primary" objective. All we know is that it is an important goal. Whether it is the most important goal or not is unclear.
User avatar
SVaidyaraman
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Last visit: 20 Aug 2024
Posts: 577
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 577
Kudos: 1,711
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
notwithstanding
Although the school would receive financial benefits if it had soft drink vending machines in the cafeteria, we should not allow them. Allowing soft drink machines there would not be in our students' interest. If our students start drinking more soft drinks, they will be less healthy.

The argument depends on which of the following?


(B) The amount of soft drinks that most students at the school currently drink is not detrimental to their health.
(C) Students are apt to be healthier if they do not drink soft drinks at all than if they just drink small amounts occasionally.
(D) Students will not simply bring soft drinks from home if the soft drink vending machines are not placed in the cafeteria.
(E) The school's primary concern should be to promote good health among its students.
Decision: Should not allow soft drink vending machines in the cafeteria,

Missing Information :If the soft drink vending machines were placed in the cafeteria, students would consume more soft drinks as a result.

Conclusion:If our students start drinking more soft drinks, they will be less healthy.
User avatar
gmatexam439
User avatar
Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 1,067
Own Kudos:
2,113
 [2]
Given Kudos: 200
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
Posts: 1,067
Kudos: 2,113
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Although the school would receive financial benefits if it had soft drink vending machines in the cafeteria, we should not allow them. Allowing soft drink machines there would not be in our students' interest. If our students start drinking more soft drinks, they will be less healthy.

The argument depends on which of the following?

(A) If the soft drink vending machines were placed in the cafeteria, students would consume more soft drinks as a result. -If the students consume more drink then it will be a problem for the students. This basically bridges the gap between the premise and the conclusion.
(B) The amount of soft drinks that most students at the school currently drink is not detrimental to their health. -We are not worried about the present condition of the students.
(C) Students are apt to be healthier if they do not drink soft drinks at all than if they just drink small amounts occasionally. -Out of scope
(D) Students will not simply bring soft drinks from home if the soft drink vending machines are not placed in the cafeteria. -Out of scope
(E) The school's primary concern should be to promote good health among its students. -Out of scope
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 20 May 2025
Posts: 3,837
Own Kudos:
3,568
 [3]
Given Kudos: 158
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,837
Kudos: 3,568
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
startjumprun
Experts please help...even I thought that the correct ans is D...
The entire argument is based upon school's viewpoint about "discouraging" students from drinking "more" soft drinks. In other words, we need to look for an option that shows that there is a link between installing vending machines and consumption of soft drink.

Let us now look at both sides of D:

i) say vending machines are not installed. In that case, (as per D) students will simply bring soft drinks from home: So clearly, not installing vending machines has no effect.

ii) say vending machines are installed. In that case anyway, the students will use vending machines to buy soft drinks in school. Again, installing vending machines is not making them drink "more" soft drinks.

The point is that as per D, installing vending machines is just shifting the behavior from bringing soft drinks from home TO buying soft drinks in school. But this is not effecting the consumption of soft drinks.
User avatar
adkikani
User avatar
IIM School Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Last visit: 24 Dec 2023
Posts: 1,238
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,207
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Other)
Posts: 1,238
Kudos: 1,312
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi GMATNinja generis GMATNinjaTwo

Can experts please comment on using negation technique of D/A?
User avatar
nitesh50
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 04 Jun 2018
Last visit: 09 Aug 2021
Posts: 140
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 139
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V32
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 3: 610 Q48 V25
GMAT 3: 610 Q48 V25
Posts: 140
Kudos: 69
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can some expert apply the negation technique in option C?
I have not been able to eliminate option C on solid grounds.
User avatar
LauraOrion
Joined: 19 Jul 2018
Last visit: 29 Apr 2019
Posts: 97
Own Kudos:
77
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Posts: 97
Kudos: 77
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hey nitesh50 -- Great question!

The language in (C) makes it difficult to negate by just changing a couple words around, so sometimes it can help to translate what you know into plainer English in your head before you negate it.

If you do that here, (C) becomes something along the lines of "Students who don't drink soft drinks are likely to be healthier than students who drink soft drinks occasionally." That's a lot easier to negate. If you do, it becomes "Students who don't drink soft drinks ARE NOT likely to be healthier than students who drink them occasionally."

If that's true, then you can combine that with a key piece of missing information: you don't know how many soft drinks students currently drink. If all the students don't drink soft drinks, then yes, the argument would fall apart. But if students drink soft drinks on a regular basis, then you don't know the consequences since you don't know the difference between the effects of drinking soft drinks on a regular basis and drinking more soft drinks on a regular basis.
avatar
thecoronafever
Joined: 20 Mar 2020
Last visit: 23 Jul 2021
Posts: 47
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 177
Posts: 47
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I want to compare between the Options C and A.

It is already stated that "school would receive financial benefits", which means that this is already that more of the drinks will be bought from vending machines and thus the assumption stated in A is already kinda given statement but what is not given is whether "drinking soft drinks is unhealthy".

Can someone help me explain more on it?
 1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7307 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
233 posts