Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Join a free live webinar and learn time-management tactics that will guarantee you answer all questions, in all sections, on time. Save your spot today!
Enter to win 3 full months of access to EMPOWERgmat's groundbreaking GMAT prep course. Prize includes all 6 GMAT Official Practice exams and access to the GMAT Club Test & Quiz Bank Pack.
Target Test Prep is kicking off spring with a fresh giveaway contest! For a limited time, you have a chance to win 4 months of full, FREE access to our 5-star rated GMAT Quant course.
Although they were both employed by the Federal Writers’ Project in th
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Feb 2012, 06:30
1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
15% (low)
Question Stats:
73% (01:15) correct 27% (01:31) wrong based on 73 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Although they were both employed by the Federal Writers’ Project in the 1930s, unlike Ralph Ellison in New York and Massachusetts, Zora Neale Hurston lived and wrote almost exclusively in the South.
A. unlike Ralph Ellison in New York and Massachusetts, Zora Neale Hurston lived and wrote almost exclusively in the American South.
B. unlike Ralph Ellison, Zora Neale Hurston lived and wrote almost exclusively in the South.
C. Zora Neale Hurston lived and wrote almost exclusively in the South, unlike Ralph Ellison in New York and Massachusetts.
D. Zora Neale Hurston lived and wrote almost exclusively in the South, whereas Ralph Ellison worked in New York and Massachusetts.
E. Zora Neale Hurston did not live and write in New York and Massachusetts, like Ralph Ellison, but rather was in the South.
Now, I understand that if we want to use 'unlike', we should use it at the beginning of the statement and 'whereas' can be used in the middle of the sentence. Can someone confirm this?
Re: Although they were both employed by the Federal Writers’ Project in th
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Feb 2012, 09:23
Chembeti wrote:
Although they were both employed by the Federal Writers’ Project in the 1930s, unlike Ralph Ellison in New York and Massachusetts, Zora Neale Hurston lived and wrote almost exclusively in the South.
A. unlike Ralph Ellison in New York and Massachusetts, Zora Neale Hurston lived and wrote almost exclusively in the American South.
B. unlike Ralph Ellison, Zora Neale Hurston lived and wrote almost exclusively in the South.
C. Zora Neale Hurston lived and wrote almost exclusively in the South, unlike Ralph Ellison in New York and Massachusetts.
D. Zora Neale Hurston lived and wrote almost exclusively in the South, whereas Ralph Ellison worked in New York and Massachusetts.
E. Zora Neale Hurston did not live and write in New York and Massachusetts, like Ralph Ellison, but rather was in the South.
Now, I understand that if we want to use 'unlike', we should use it at the beginning of the statement and 'whereas' can be used in the middle of the sentence. Can someone confirm this?
Not really. In principle, either one is acceptable.
The thing is, "unlike" is a preposition and introduces a modifying phrase. "Whereas" is a conjunction and introduces a subordinate clause.
In this sentence, we open with a subordinate clause: "Although they were both employed by the Federal Writers’ Project in the 1930s..." The use of the plural pronoun "they" means that we need two nouns serving the same grammatical and logical function. Only D does this correctly, using both "Zora Neale Hurston" and "Ralph Ellison" as subjects (albeit in different clauses). The other four choices all use "Zora Neale Hurston" as a subject but "Ralph Ellison" as the object of a preposition, making it impossible to join the two together into one unit to encapsulate within one plural pronoun reference.
_________________
Re: Although they were both employed by the Federal Writers’ Project in th
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Feb 2012, 11:12
2
Chembeti wrote:
rustypolymath wrote:
Chembeti wrote:
Although they were both employed by the Federal Writers’ Project in the 1930s, unlike Ralph Ellison in New York and Massachusetts, Zora Neale Hurston lived and wrote almost exclusively in the South.
A. unlike Ralph Ellison in New York and Massachusetts, Zora Neale Hurston lived and wrote almost exclusively in the American South.
B. unlike Ralph Ellison, Zora Neale Hurston lived and wrote almost exclusively in the South.
C. Zora Neale Hurston lived and wrote almost exclusively in the South, unlike Ralph Ellison in New York and Massachusetts.
D. Zora Neale Hurston lived and wrote almost exclusively in the South, whereas Ralph Ellison worked in New York and Massachusetts.
E. Zora Neale Hurston did not live and write in New York and Massachusetts, like Ralph Ellison, but rather was in the South.
Now, I understand that if we want to use 'unlike', we should use it at the beginning of the statement and 'whereas' can be used in the middle of the sentence. Can someone confirm this?
Not really. In principle, either one is acceptable.
The thing is, "unlike" is a preposition and introduces a modifying phrase. "Whereas" is a conjunction and introduces a subordinate clause.
In this sentence, we open with a subordinate clause: "Although they were both employed by the Federal Writers’ Project in the 1930s..." The use of the plural pronoun "they" means that we need two nouns serving the same grammatical and logical function. Only D does this correctly, using both "Zora Neale Hurston" and "Ralph Ellison" as subjects (albeit in different clauses). The other four choices all use "Zora Neale Hurston" as a subject but "Ralph Ellison" as the object of a preposition, making it impossible to join the two together into one unit to encapsulate within one plural pronoun reference.
got it...but bit complicated
Think of it this way: an ordinary singular pronoun has to refer to a single item, while an ordinary plural pronoun has to refer to several items that can be logically lumped together. Normally, this would be a plural subject or a plural object.
You could have two singular parallel subjects be lumped together for an ordinary plural pronoun; this is the case here. At the outer limit you could have one singular subject and its own direct object lumped together but one singular subject and an indirect object is just too much of a stretch. Semantically they become very difficult to use as an integral entity.
What is important on GMAT Sentence Corrections is not so much, "I use this word in this place and that word in that place," but, "What is the sentence trying to say? What does this thing point to? Why does it fail to say what it wants?"
_________________
Re: Although they were both employed by the Federal Writers’ Project in th
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Feb 2012, 16:17
rustypolymath wrote:
What is important on GMAT Sentence Corrections is not so much, "I use this word in this place and that word in that place," but, "What is the sentence trying to say? What does this thing point to? Why does it fail to say what it wants?"
Being a non-native speaker, it is difficult to remember these kinds of rules. But as you said, I should try thinking "What is the sentence trying to say? What does this thing point to? Why does it fail to say what it wants?"
Re: Although they were both employed by the Federal Writers’ Project in th
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Feb 2012, 16:52
1
Chembeti wrote:
rustypolymath wrote:
What is important on GMAT Sentence Corrections is not so much, "I use this word in this place and that word in that place," but, "What is the sentence trying to say? What does this thing point to? Why does it fail to say what it wants?"
Being a non-native speaker, it is difficult to remember these kinds of rules. But as you said, I should try thinking "What is the sentence trying to say? What does this thing point to? Why does it fail to say what it wants?"
Thanks
No problem. But that's exactly the point. Memorizing a list of rules is not going to get you anywhere if all you end up doing is looking for mistakes when there are none. Sentences are written to communicate ideas. Bad sentences fail to communicate well, either because they don't use the correct syntax (conjugation, tense, forms, completeness of structure) or they don't employ the appropriate semantic references (pronoun reference/choice, modifiers). A language is a logic for codifying ideas, and the images our brains form when we read about something are very similar to the output a computer program compiler makes out of the codes we write with computer languages.
_________________
Re: Although they were both employed by the Federal Writers’ Project in th
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Apr 2019, 19:55
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
close
73% (01:15) correct 
