GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 15 Dec 2018, 20:49

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
  • $450 Tuition Credit & Official CAT Packs FREE

     December 15, 2018

     December 15, 2018

     10:00 PM PST

     11:00 PM PST

    Get the complete Official GMAT Exam Pack collection worth $100 with the 3 Month Pack ($299)
  • FREE Quant Workshop by e-GMAT!

     December 16, 2018

     December 16, 2018

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score.

Armstrong: For the treatment of a particular disease, Dr. Sullivan arg

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 07 Dec 2017
Posts: 289
Armstrong: For the treatment of a particular disease, Dr. Sullivan arg  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Aug 2018, 04:31
3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

56% (01:18) correct 44% (01:25) wrong based on 218 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Armstrong: For the treatment of a particular disease, Dr. Sullivan argues for using nutritional supplements rather than the pharrnaceuticals
that most doctors prescribe. But this is in his self-interest since he is paid to endorse a line of nutritional supplements. Thus, we should not use nutritional supplements in treating the disease.

Armstrong's argument is flawed in that it


A. relies on two different meanings of the term "supplement" to draw a conclusion

B. relies solely on an appeal to an authority whose trustworthiness should not necessarily be taken for granted

C. appeals to people's emotions regarding the treatment of disease rather than to the efficacy of the two approaches to treatment

D. criticizes Dr. Sullivan's motives for holding a position rather than addressing the position itself

E.. fails to justify its presumption that nutritional supplements cannot be used in conjunction with other treatments



LSAT
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 7108
Re: Armstrong: For the treatment of a particular disease, Dr. Sullivan arg  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Aug 2018, 07:59
AshutoshB wrote:
Armstrong: For the treatment of a particular disease, Dr. Sullivan argues for using nutritional supplements rather than the pharrnaceuticals
that most doctors prescribe. But this is in his self-interest since he is paid to endorse a line of nutritional supplements. Thus, we should not use nutritional supplements in treating the disease.

Armstrong's argument is flawed in that it

A. relies on two different meanings of the term "supplement" to draw a conclusion

B. relies solely on an appeal to an authority whose trustworthiness should not necessarily be taken for granted

C. appeals to people's emotions regarding the treatment of disease rather than to the efficacy of the two approaches to treatment

D. criticizes Dr. Sullivan's motives for holding a position rather than addressing the position itself

E.. fails to justify its presumption that nutritional supplements cannot be used in conjunction with other treatments

LSAT

KUDOS will be Appreciated


Armstrong initially attacks Dr S method and there after attaches his personal motive to that method.
So he does not attack the shortcomings of the method but involves personal motive to the method.

D gives the exact reasoning
_________________

1) Absolute modulus : http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modulus-a-better-understanding-210849.html#p1622372
2)Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html
3) effects of arithmetic operations : https://gmatclub.com/forum/effects-of-arithmetic-operations-on-fractions-269413.html


GMAT online Tutor

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 05 Dec 2014
Posts: 198
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V36
GPA: 3.54
CAT Tests
Re: Armstrong: For the treatment of a particular disease, Dr. Sullivan arg  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Aug 2018, 11:49
chetan2u wrote:
AshutoshB wrote:
Armstrong: For the treatment of a particular disease, Dr. Sullivan argues for using nutritional supplements rather than the pharrnaceuticals
that most doctors prescribe. But this is in his self-interest since he is paid to endorse a line of nutritional supplements. Thus, we should not use nutritional supplements in treating the disease.

Armstrong's argument is flawed in that it

A. relies on two different meanings of the term "supplement" to draw a conclusion

B. relies solely on an appeal to an authority whose trustworthiness should not necessarily be taken for granted

C. appeals to people's emotions regarding the treatment of disease rather than to the efficacy of the two approaches to treatment

D. criticizes Dr. Sullivan's motives for holding a position rather than addressing the position itself

E.. fails to justify its presumption that nutritional supplements cannot be used in conjunction with other treatments

LSAT

KUDOS will be Appreciated


Armstrong initially attacks Dr S method and there after attaches his personal motive to that method.
So he does not attack the shortcomings of the method but involves personal motive to the method.

D gives the exact reasoning


Hi Chetan2u,
Can you please explain option D again. Armstrong did not initially attack Dr. Sullivan's method. He found a reason that since personal motives are involved, w cant trust Dr. Sulivan.
Option D states that- D. criticizes Dr. Sullivan's motives for holding a position rather than addressing the position itself
I think the flaw is Armstrong's method of reasoning to dismiss Sulivan's claim. Armstrong does not need to address the position whether nutritional supplements are better than the pharrnaceutical supplements. His logic of reasoning to dismiss Sulivan's claim is wrong.
Please help me on this.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 01 Feb 2018
Posts: 77
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Marketing
GPA: 4
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: Armstrong: For the treatment of a particular disease, Dr. Sullivan arg  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Nov 2018, 03:15
pls help me to how OA is correct.. cant really link OA with question stem :(
Veritas Prep and Orion Instructor
User avatar
S
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 327
Re: Armstrong: For the treatment of a particular disease, Dr. Sullivan arg  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Nov 2018, 13:04
1
Top Contributor
If you break down this argument:

Sentence 1 is background information telling us that this doctor recommends supplements.

Sentence 2 is the evidence for the conclusion: the doctor is acting in self interest! Notice, too, that the supplements aren't mentioned here...just the doctor.

Sentence 3 is the conclusion: therefore, we shouldn't use these supplements.

So if we're looking for a flaw in reasoning, it has to do with Sentence 2, or how 2 interacts with 3.

Look at what's missing between 2 and 3 - the only piece of evidence for "don't use the supplements" is "the doctor acts in self-interest." The major premise never mentions the supplements! All it does is mention how the doctor is motivated. And that's the flaw: the conclusion says that you shouldn't use supplements, but its only evidence is about the motives of one person who recommends the supplements - we don't have any evidence that the supplements are ineffective (or bad for any other reason). And that's what D tells us.
_________________

Brian

Curriculum Developer, Instructor, and Host of Veritas Prep On Demand

Save $100 on live Veritas Prep GMAT Courses and Admissions Consulting

Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

GMAT Club Bot
Re: Armstrong: For the treatment of a particular disease, Dr. Sullivan arg &nbs [#permalink] 11 Nov 2018, 13:04
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Armstrong: For the treatment of a particular disease, Dr. Sullivan arg

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.