Hi eteum,Good question, and the fix is in what the question is actually asking. StuffMob raised the same "but they made exactly one purchase" point, so let's clear both together.
The stem doesn't ask what the store paid
in total for candles. It asks how much it paid for the candles
it still had in stock at the end of the week. That phrase quietly does all the work: to answer it, you need to know which candles are
left - and candles leave a store by being
sold.
So selling isn't an assumption you bring in from Statement (1). A store's ending inventory is naturally its starting stock, plus what it bought, minus what it sold. The possibility of sales is baked into the question itself, no matter which statement you're looking at.
Now take
Statement (2) alone, which is where you leaned toward B. Yes, it pins down the one extra purchase:
200 candles for
$40. But it says nothing about how many candles were sold, so the ending stock is still unknown.
Two cases that both obey Statement (2):- Store sells
0 candles - it still has all
550 +
200 =
750, paid for =
137.50 +
40 =
$177.50- Store sells
300 candles - far fewer remain, so the cost of end-of-week stock is
well under $177.50Same statement,
two different answers -
not sufficient. That's the tell for why (
2) alone fails.
Statement (
1) gives sales in
dollars (
$120) but no price per candle, so it can't tell you the
number sold either. Even combined, you still can't turn
$120 into a candle count - so together they're still short, and the answer is
E.
Takeaway: whenever two valid cases satisfy a statement but land on different answers, that statement isn't
sufficient.
Answer: Eeteum
Is it because of statement 1 we have to assume that some candles are sold? I thought we looked at each statement by itself and that would lead me to B because it details the exact one time that more candles were purchased during the week