A little under a million years ago, the briny waters of the Baltic Sea

Question

A little under a million years ago, the briny waters of the Baltic Sea began flooding into the cold North Atlantic: geologists are still debating  whether the flood was gradual or created a cataclysm .

(A) whether the flood was gradual or created a cataclysm

(B) if the flood was gradual or created a cataclysm

(C) about whether the flood was gradual or cataclysmic

(D) whether the flood was gradual or cataclysmic

(E) whether the flood was gradual or it created a cataclysm

ydmuley · Accepted Answer

A little under a million years ago, the briny waters of the Baltic Sea began flooding into the cold North Atlantic: geologists are still debating  whether the flood was gradual or created a cataclysm.

(A) whether the flood was  gradual  or  created a cataclysm  ==> Issue with parallelism

(B) if the flood was  gradual  or  created a cataclysm  ==> Issue with parallelism

(C)  about  whether the flood was gradual or cataclysmic ==> "About" is redundant

(D)  whether  the flood was  gradual  or  cataclysmic

(E) whether the flood was  gradual  or  it created a cataclysm  ==> Issue with parallelism

BKimball · Answer

Vannu,

tarek99 is right on here. "OR" is a classic parallelism marker. When you see that word, you should look for parallelism problems. Notice how "or" is used:

"Would you like to drink soda or tea?" --> The two nouns in parallel are "soda" and "tea." It would be incorrect to say "Would like to drink soda or drinking tea?" 
"I am going to run or swim today." --> The two verbs in parallel are "run" and "swim." It would be incorrect to say "I am going running or to swim today."

In your example, the flood either one thing or another, so those two things need to be parallel.

Make sense?

Brett

tarek99 · Answer

I choose option D. We need to have parallelism between 2 adjectives. "gradual" is an adjective and so is "cataclysmic."

vraptor · Answer

(D)

(A) whether the flood was gradual or  created a  cataclysm
(B)  if  the flood was gradual or created a cataclysm
(C)  about  whether the flood was gradual or cataclysmic
(D) whether the flood was gradual or cataclysmic
(E) whether the flood was gradual or  it created  a cataclysm

nikhil007 · Answer

can someone pl explain whats wrong with E?

Ddc · Answer

Firstly the parallelism. 2ndly look for  Meaning  in E. in X OR Y both X & Y should make sense together. Here it doesn't.

rekhaanem · Answer

' whether ' is used when you have alternatives as in 'this or this'. ' if ' is used when you have only one option. In the question above, since its about flood being gradual or not, we have to chose 'whether' instead of 'if.

Looking into option A, D and E -here comes the parallelism.  A or B 
So the answer is D - whether the flood was 'gradual' or 'cataclysmic'

rever08 · Answer

Parallelism + Idiom

A is wrong because the things before and after ‘or’ are not parallel; i.e. “was gradual” and “created a cataclysm” are not parallel.
B is wrong because ‘whether’ is always better than ‘if’.
C uses an extra word ‘about’. We never debate ‘about’ something, we debate ‘over’ something.
E repeats the mistake in A.
D is the best choice.

GAURAV1113 · Answer

Hi everyone,
What is the problem with parallelism in option-E
The flood was gradual OR It created a cataclysm.
On either side of "OR" we have clauses or should it shall be read as: 
Whether the flood was gradual OR It created a cataclysm.

We require whether on both side of OR to treat it as parallel.

svasan05 · Answer

A little under a million years ago, the briny waters of the Baltic Sea began flooding into the cold North Atlantic: geologists are still debating  whether the flood was gradual or created a cataclysm .

(A) whether the flood was gradual or created a cataclysm  The items of the list (X or Y) are not parallel - "gradual" is an adjective whereas "created" is a verb. Eliminate.

(B) if the flood was gradual or created a cataclysm  "if" is to be used only when there is a condition ("if X then Y"). When debating between choices, the correct usage is "whether. Eliminate.

(C) about whether the flood was gradual or cataclysmic  "debating about" is incorrect - it should just be "debating X". Eliminate.

(D) whether the flood was gradual or cataclysmic  Correct answer. X or Y parallelism is maintained with both being adjectives and no new errors are introduced.

(E) whether the flood was gradual or it created a cataclysm  Same error as (A). Eliminate.

Hope this helps.

Adnani · Answer

D is correct answer parallelism as well as concise..
About seems redundant..

Posted from my mobile device

sr158 · Answer

Hi @egamt
 
I am unable to identify issue(s) in Option E and Option A:

In option E:

Both the list contains clause

List 1: whether the flood was gradual (here verb : "was" and object "gradual")

List 2: whether it created a cataclysm (here verb: "created". Since flood did the action of "creating cataclysm" hence "created cannot be considered verb-ed modifier.)

Q.1 : I understand the two lists are structurally identical since both are clause. Pls confirm if my understanding is correct.

Q-2: Even though both lists are identical however both lists do NOT talk about same issue:

List-1 talks about how the flood is ---- it is gradual

But lists-2 talks about some action which was done by flood and does not talks about flood.

Since the lists does not talks about same issue hence it because of this reason it is not parallel. Pls confirm my understanding.

VerbalBot · Answer

Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

A little under a million years ago, the briny waters of the Baltic Sea

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Questions

A little under a million years ago, the briny waters of the Baltic Sea

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards