Last visit was: 12 Dec 2024, 01:46 It is currently 12 Dec 2024, 01:46
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
NandishSS
Joined: 06 Jan 2015
Last visit: 28 Jan 2021
Posts: 723
Own Kudos:
1,630
 [7]
Given Kudos: 579
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GPA: 3.35
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 723
Kudos: 1,630
 [7]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
msk0657
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 26 Nov 2012
Last visit: 14 Feb 2020
Posts: 472
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 46
Posts: 472
Kudos: 522
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
hsbinfy
Joined: 02 Mar 2012
Last visit: 13 Nov 2017
Posts: 196
Own Kudos:
307
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Schools: Schulich '16
Schools: Schulich '16
Posts: 196
Kudos: 307
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
meenakshimiyer
Joined: 12 Jan 2019
Last visit: 13 Mar 2019
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
18
 [1]
Posts: 35
Kudos: 18
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Clearly, the second boldface sentence is the conclusion made in the argument. There is nothing to debate about it.
Answering this question would be relatively easy if you focus on the use of “only slightly higher” in the first boldface sentence. “Only slightly higher” adds positively to the conclusion made in the argument. If it were just “higher” or “somewhat higher” then it would have opposed to conclusion. So, bold face statement here, in light of other information provided, supports the claim. Hence, B is the answer.
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 12 Dec 2024
Posts: 4,507
Own Kudos:
31,788
 [1]
Given Kudos: 667
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Products:
Expert reply
Posts: 4,507
Kudos: 31,788
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
NandishSS
Because the cork stoppers in wine bottles can leak, crumble, or become moldy, winemakers must often discard a significant proportion of their inventory of bottled wine. Bottlemaster, Inc., produces a plastic stopper that cannot leak, crumble, or mold. Bottlemaster's plastic stopper is available to winemakers for a price only slightly higher than that of traditional cork stoppers, and cork prices are expected to rise considerably in the near future. Therefore, Bottlemaster's plastic stopper will increase its share of the market for wine-bottle stoppers.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A)The first and the second each provide evidence to support the conclusion of the argument.

B)The first presents information that, in light of other information presented, provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.

C)The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument opposes; the second is the conclusion of the argument.

D)The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument opposes; the second provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument.

E)The first is a claim that the argument challenges; the second is a conclusion on which that challenge is based.

Please explain the line of reasoning


Understanding the passage:


Defects of cork stoppers often cause a lot of wastage of wine. New plastic stoppers by Bottlemaster Inc. is superior to the cork stoppers and devoid of these defects. Yet they are made available at only a slightly higher price. Meanwhile, cork stoppers are expected to be more expensive soon. This makes us believe that BM's plastic stoppers will grab more of the market share for wine stoppers.

Conclusion:Bottlemaster's plastic stopper will increase its share of the market for wine-bottle stoppers.

Prethinking:



BF1: Bottlemaster's plastic stopper is available to winemakers for a price only slightly higher than that of traditional cork stoppers
This information by itself is strictly not in support of the conclusion since it states that plastic stoppers are more expensive. But together with the other premises in the passage, we can see that the plastic stoppers offer much more cost-benefits. Hence it supports the conclusion.

BF2: Bottlemaster's plastic stopper will increase its share of the market for wine-bottle stoppers.
This is the main conclusion. it is supported by BF1.

Option Analysis



A) The first and the second each provide evidence to support the conclusion of the argument.
The first does provide evidence in support of the conclusion, but the second is the conclusion itself. Therefore this is an incorrect option.

B) The first presents information that, in light of other information presented, provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.
This option is in line with our prethinking. Hence this is the correct answer.

C)The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument opposes; the second is the conclusion of the argument.
The first can be called an evidence to support a position; but that position /standpoint is the main conclusion itself. It does not oppose the argument. This part is incorrect. The second is indeed the conclusion.

D)The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument opposes; the second provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument.
The first statement is the same as option C, which is incorrect. The second part is incorrect since BF2 is the conclusion and not an evidence to support the conclusion.

E) The first is a claim that the argument challenges; the second is a conclusion on which that challenge is based.
The first is not a claim that is challenged. It is a fact used to support the argument. The second is indeed a conclusion. But there is no such challenge as mentioned.
avatar
brianmontanaweb
Joined: 06 Apr 2022
Last visit: 03 Sep 2022
Posts: 120
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
Posts: 120
Kudos: 14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
NandishSS
Because the cork stoppers in wine bottles can leak, crumble, or become moldy, winemakers must often discard a significant proportion of their inventory of bottled wine. Bottlemaster, Inc., produces a plastic stopper that cannot leak, crumble, or mold. Bottlemaster's plastic stopper is available to winemakers for a price only slightly higher than that of traditional cork stoppers, and cork prices are expected to rise considerably in the near future. Therefore, Bottlemaster's plastic stopper will increase its share of the market for wine-bottle stoppers.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A)The first and the second each provide evidence to support the conclusion of the argument.

B)The first presents information that, in light of other information presented, provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.

C)The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument opposes; the second is the conclusion of the argument.

D)The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument opposes; the second provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument.

E)The first is a claim that the argument challenges; the second is a conclusion on which that challenge is based.

The first claim is evidence for a plastic stopper after stating the issues of a wood cork, the second is the conclusion and outcome.

A addresses is only half right. The second phrase does not provide evidence.

C, and D are wrong because there is no supporting a position in the argument in the previous phrases. We've only seen the argument mention the current wood cork issues, and failures up to this point.

E is wrong because there is no challenge, and the conclusion does not challenge wood corks. The conclusion only states why plastic would be a better alternative than wood.

B is correct since it follows the issues of a wood cork with the benefits, and costs of a plastic stopper.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 17,988
Own Kudos:
Posts: 17,988
Kudos: 902
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7153 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts