shabuzen102
Hi Ajitesh,
Thanks for your response. If that's the case, then how can we decide which meaning is better than which? How can we know what the author intends to say? To me, the meaning of "ruled some country as a colony" can be the author's intention just as much as "being some country's colony". Please help me explain that! Thanks.
Hi
shabuzen102,
That's a good question, but there are no easy answers here. Here are a few things we could do/consider:
1. Focus on official questions. If you feel that a non-official question is asking you to take an unfair/unreasonable call, let that question go.
2. (But) be open to taking a call on other questions. There are many official questions (like
this one and
this one and
this one) in which option A does
not provide us the correct meaning.
3. The intended meaning has less to do with what is
possible than with what is
likely. We may have to read the entire question (all 5 options) before we have enough information to make a decision.
Also, we cannot overlook the fact that
the GMAT will test meaning:
Quote:
In recent years, GMAT item writers have been concentrating on the reasoning aspects rather than the purely grammatical aspects of Sentence Correction skills. As always, test takers need to carefully read the prompt in order to choose the answer that produces the most effective sentence. This means that whereas two sentences may both be grammatically appropriate, the correct answer is the sentence that is most “effective”―the sentence that better expresses the idea.
From the official mba.com blog... in
2011.
There is a lot of bad advice out there about how option A always contains the intended meaning. Ignore it. And if that were actually true (about option A), what would be the point of testing meaning in the first place?