I am interviewing with Kaplan to become a GMAT Instructor. While I am not 100% sold on the Kaplan information, I think that it could still be very good and I think the classroom setting has a lot to do with the instructor's abilities. I think you could get a great instructor at Kaplan and learn better/more than if you got a bad instructor at
MGMAT. (Now don't debate if
MGMAT even employs bad instructors, but you get the point).
The pay is not great, but I'm weighing the benefits of being an instructor part time. Do top school even care?
By the way...I've decided to wait on applying to schools until next year or maybe even fall of 2010. Much of it will depend on a few options that may materialize in a few months.
I looked into Manhattan and they require a 99% score which doesn't concern me. I'm pretty confident I could raise my Quant to a 49 or 50 with more practice and my verbal to 44 or 45 which would be a 760 for a 99%. But I have also read on the
MGMAT website that they require all their instructors to graduate from a top-ranked MBA program BEFORE teaching. I don't know if this is new, but I didn't remember seeing that before, and their website looks totally different now.
I'd appreciate a few perspectives from people on the benefits of being a GMAT instructor. I don't think I'll be doing this with monetary gain as my #1 motive (it just doesn't pay enough for that to be a significant motive).