Forum Home > GMAT > Quantitative > Problem Solving (PS)
Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Dec 1511:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease.
Dec 1608:00 AM PST
-11:59 PM PST
GMAT Club 12 Days of Christmas is a 4th Annual GMAT Club Winter Competition based on solving questions. This is the Winter GMAT competition on GMAT Club with an amazing opportunity to win over $40,000 worth of prizes!- Dec 17
09:00 AM PST
-10:00 AM PST
Join Manhattan Prep instructor Whitney Garner for a fun—and thorough—review of logic-based (non-math) problems, with a particular emphasis on Data Sufficiency and Two-Parts. - Dec 18
10:00 AM PST
-11:00 AM PST
Here is the essential guide to securing scholarships as an MBA student! In this video, we explore the various types of scholarships available, including need-based and merit-based options.
24 May 2022, 00:31
Kudos
Bookmarks
Critics emphasize that, as yet, no one has documented the bones of an extinct Australian/New Guinean giant with compelling evidence of its having been killed by humans, or even of its having lived in association with humans.
In this sentence, does "evidence of having been killed" mean that "evidence that it had been killed"?
please someone make me understand this sentence properly. Thanks in advance.
Posted from my mobile device
In this sentence, does "evidence of having been killed" mean that "evidence that it had been killed"?
please someone make me understand this sentence properly. Thanks in advance.
Posted from my mobile device
01 Jun 2022, 10:58
Kudos
Bookmarks
nahid78
Critics emphasize that, as yet, no one has documented the bones of an extinct Australian/New Guinean giant with compelling evidence of its having been killed by humans, or even of its having lived in association with humans.
In this sentence, does "evidence of having been killed" mean that "evidence that it had been killed"?
please someone make me understand this sentence properly. Thanks in advance.
Posted from my mobile device
In this sentence, does "evidence of having been killed" mean that "evidence that it had been killed"?
please someone make me understand this sentence properly. Thanks in advance.
Posted from my mobile device
I think that's what it is going for, yes. But structurally this sentence seems pretty messy.
I'd look for something more like: "Critics emphasize that, as yet, no documented bones of the extinct Asutralian/New Guinean giant [...animal?] show any compelling evidence that it was killed by humans, or even that it lived in association with humans."
Moderators:
