GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 17 Oct 2019, 12:15

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Consumer advocate: Manufacturers of children's toys often place warnin

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 07 Dec 2017
Posts: 316
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V30
Reviews Badge
Consumer advocate: Manufacturers of children's toys often place warnin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Aug 2018, 03:38
2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

50% (02:10) correct 50% (02:16) wrong based on 161 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Consumer advocate: Manufacturers of children's toys often place warnings on their products that overstate the dangers their products pose. Product-warning labels should overstate dangers only I f doing so reduces injuries. In fact, however, manufacturers overstate their products' dangers merely for the purpose of protecting themselves from lawsuits brought by parents of injured children. Therefore, manufacturers of children's toys should not overstate the dangers their products pose.

Which one of the following most accurately describes a reasoning flaw in the consumer advocate's argument?

(A) The argument confuses a necessary condition for reducing the number of injuries caused by a product with a sufficient condition
.
(B) The argument overlooks the possibility that warnings that do not overstate the dangers that their products pose do not always reduce injuries.

(C) The argument relies on a sample that is unlikely to be representative.

(D) The argument presumes, without providing justification, that if a warning overstates a danger, then the warning will fail to prevent injuries.

(E) The argument relies on the unjustified assumption that an action has an effect only if it was performed in order to bring about that effect.
Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 20 Feb 2015
Posts: 764
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Consumer advocate: Manufacturers of children's toys often place warnin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Aug 2018, 05:11
AshutoshB wrote:
Consumer advocate: Manufacturers of children's toys often place warnings on their products that overstate the dangers their products pose. Product-warning labels should overstate dangers only I f doing so reduces injuries. In fact, however, manufacturers overstate their products' dangers merely for the purpose of protecting themselves from lawsuits brought by parents of injured children. Therefore, manufacturers of children's toys should not overstate the dangers their products pose.

Which one of the following most accurately describes a reasoning flaw in the consumer advocate's argument?

(A) The argument confuses a necessary condition for reducing the number of injuries caused by a product with a sufficient condition
.
(B) The argument overlooks the possibility that warnings that do not overstate the dangers that their products pose do not always reduce injuries.

(C) The argument relies on a sample that is unlikely to be representative.

(D) The argument presumes, without providing justification, that if a warning overstates a danger, then the warning will fail to prevent injuries.

(E) The argument relies on the unjustified assumption that an action has an effect only if it was performed in order to bring about that effect.



Imo-

If a toy has a "Choking Hazard" written on it .
One can choke unintentionally.

E for me
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 10 May 2018
Posts: 120
Concentration: Finance, Sustainability
Re: Consumer advocate: Manufacturers of children's toys often place warnin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Aug 2018, 11:46
1
My take on the post.
Read along.
AshutoshB wrote:
Consumer advocate: Manufacturers of children's toys often place warnings on their products that overstate the dangers their products pose. Product-warning labels should overstate dangers only if doing so reduces injuries. In fact, however, manufacturers overstate their products' dangers merely for the purpose of protecting themselves from lawsuits brought by parents of injured children. Therefore, manufacturers of children's toys should not overstate the dangers their products pose.

Which one of the following most accurately describes a reasoning flaw in the consumer advocate's argument?

(A) The argument confuses a necessary condition for reducing the number of injuries caused by a product with a sufficient condition
.The passage doesn't mention anything as the sufficient condition.
(B) The argument overlooks the possibility that warnings that do not overstate the dangers that their products pose do not always reduce injuries.We are talking about the warnings which overstate the dangers. Warnings that do not overstate the dangers are not discussed in the passage.
(C) The argument relies on a sample that is unlikely to be representative.Talks about all manufacturers as a whole. It is certainly representative.

(D) The argument presumes, without providing justification, that if a warning overstates a danger, then the warning will fail to prevent injuries.
This is not justifying as a flaw of the argument. The phrase will fail almost sounds too certain, which is not backed up by the passage.
(E) The argument relies on the unjustified assumption that an action has an effect only if it was performed in order to bring about that effect.The wrong assumption of the consumer advocate that the warning labels are mentioned merely to protect toy manufacturers from lawsuits results.

_________________
Stuck in the 600-700 score bracket? I welcome you to read my four-step course of action to a modest score.
I also invite you to critique and help me find flaws in my modus operandi. Thanks!
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 12 Jan 2016
Posts: 2
Consumer advocate: Manufacturers of children's toys often place warnin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2018, 21:07
1
I will try to answer this question

Consumer advocate: Manufacturers of children's toys often place warnings on their products that overstate the dangers their products pose. Product-warning labels should overstate dangers only I f doing so reduces injuries. In fact, however, manufacturers overstate their products' dangers merely for the purpose of protecting themselves from lawsuits brought by parents of injured children. Therefore, manufacturers of children's toys should not overstate the dangers their products pose.

Which one of the following most accurately describes a reasoning flaw in the consumer advocate's argument?

(A) The argument confuses a necessary condition for reducing the number of injuries caused by a product with a sufficient condition
.
(B) The argument overlooks the possibility that warnings that do not overstate the dangers that their products pose do not always reduce injuries.

(C) The argument relies on a sample that is unlikely to be representative.

(D) The argument presumes, without providing justification, that if a warning overstates a danger, then the warning will fail to prevent injuries.

(E) The argument relies on the unjustified assumption that an action has an effect only if it was performed in order to bring about that effect.


The answer choice e can be interpreted as:
If an action-printing warning signs- has an effect-preventing against lawsuits- then the warnings were printed to prevent against lawsuits.
Clearly, this is the flaw in this argument as it overlooks the other beneficial effects the warnings can have.
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 5918
Re: Consumer advocate: Manufacturers of children's toys often place warnin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Sep 2019, 18:32
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Consumer advocate: Manufacturers of children's toys often place warnin   [#permalink] 23 Sep 2019, 18:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Consumer advocate: Manufacturers of children's toys often place warnin

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne